TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Murdoch apologises for ‘grotesque, offensive cartoon’ on Holocaust Memorial Day

The Sunday Times carried the cartoon of Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu last Sunday.

Flowers lay on a slab of the Holocaust Memorial to commemorate the victims of the Nazi regime at the International Holocaust Rememberance Day in Berlin.
Flowers lay on a slab of the Holocaust Memorial to commemorate the victims of the Nazi regime at the International Holocaust Rememberance Day in Berlin.
Image: Markus Schreiber/AP/Press Association Images

MEDIA BARON RUPERT MURDOCH has apologized for a Sunday Times cartoon depicting Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu building a wall using blood-red mortar, an image Jewish leaders said was reminiscent of anti-Semitic propaganda.

The political cartoon, which was published on Holocaust Memorial Day, shows Netanyahu wielding a long, sharp trowel and depicts agonized Palestinians bricked into the wall’s structure. It was meant as a comment on recent elections in which Netanyahu’s ticket narrowly won the most seats in the Israeli parliament.

“Will cementing the peace continue?” the caption read, a reference both to the stalled peace process and Israel’s separation barrier, a complex of fences and concrete walls which Israel portrays as a defense against suicide bombers but which Palestinians say is a land grab under the guise of security.

Murdoch wrote on Twitter that the cartoonist, Gerald Scarfe — a veteran artist who frequently depicts blood in his work — did not reflect the paper’s editorial line. “Nevertheless, we owe [a] major apology for [the] grotesque, offensive cartoon,” Murdoch tweeted.

murdoch

Jewish community leaders were particularly disturbed by parallels they saw between the red-tinged drawing and historical anti-Semitic propaganda — in particular the theme of “blood libel,” the twisted but persistent myth that Jews secretly use human blood in their religious rituals.

Their anger was heightened by the fact that the cartoon was published on a day meant to commemorate the communities destroyed by the Nazis and their allies in the mid-20th century.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, which represents the country’s roughly 265,000-strong Jewish community, said it had lodged a complaint with the UK press watchdog.

Anti-Semitic Arab press

The deputies said in a statement that the depiction of a Jewish leader using blood for mortar “is shockingly reminiscent of the blood libel imagery more usually found in parts of the virulently anti-Semitic Arab press.”

Israel’s ambassador to Britain echoed the statement, while the speaker of Israel’s parliament, Reuven Rivlin, wrote to his UK counterpart to express “extreme outrage.”

Murdoch’s News International, which publishes the Times, said Scarfe was not available for comment.

In a statement, the paper’s acting editor, Martin Ivens, said that insulting the memory of Holocaust victims or invoking blood libel “the last thing I or anyone connected with the Sunday Times would countenance.”

“The paper has long written strongly in defense of Israel and its security concerns, as have I as a columnist,” Ivens said. “We are, however, reminded of the sensitivities in this area by the reaction to the cartoon, and I will of course bear them very carefully in mind in future.”

British political cartoons can be shocking to those used to tamer American drawings of donkeys and elephants slugging it out on Capitol Hill.

Distorted features, blood, and excrement are commonplace. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair, a once-popular leader whose reputation was badly damaged by his decision to support the US invasion of Iraq, was often depicted with ghoulish features, sharpened fangs, or with his hands or mouth drenched in gore.

Scarfe, whose career with the Sunday Times stretches back to the 1960s, often makes use of blood in his cartoons.

The red fluid is splashed across his website and featured, for example, in a recent cartoon of Syrian leader Bashar Assad, who was pictured as a green, wraith-like creature drinking greedily from an oversized cup labeled “Children’s Blood.”

Read: Opponents outraged as Berlusconi defends Mussolini for Nazi alliance >

Read next:

Comments (94 Comments)

  • It takes a cool head and steel nerves to win peace. There are many arguments on both sides but reacting with violence is giving into those who want chaos and division. Calm down everyone.

    Reply
    • Demonizing Israel and Jews is not a recipe for peace. It is a recipe for another disaster like the Holocaust.

      Reply
    • Discussing the true nature of the state of Israel, including its sadistic Kafkaesque system of apartheid in the Occupied West Bank and it’s inhuman siege of Gaza, is very necessary.

      Reply
    • “Demonizing Israel and Jews is not a recipe for peace. It is a recipe for another disaster like the Holocaust.”

      Yes, yes, Johnny. Its not the blood soaked Israeli Prime Minister building an apartheid wall thats a recipe for disaster, its somebody drawing a satirical cartoon about it thats going to cause another holocaust….

      Reply
    • who’s reacting with violence? Are Jews burning down British businesses or embassies? Are Jews threatening to kill the cartoonist, requiring him to hide from public view? Does Israel broadcast sermons calling Muslims “sons of apes and pigs” and inciting people to slaughter them? No, none of those things are happening.
      Compare the reaction to that against the cartoons of Mohammed. Then talk about “reacting with violence”

      Reply
  • Simple Facts to consider.
    In 1948, the land could have been split between Jews and Arabs as was suggested by the League of Nations Partition Plan.
    The Palestine Mandate region was populated very sparsely prior to WW1. Only after Jewish immigration and the establishment of agricultural communities brought employment did Arabs from Egypt, Transjordan, Lebanon and Syria come to get work. Refugees are those who lost their home – i.e. approx 6-700,000. Their families are not refugees and did not ‘know the land’.

    The Jews said yes, the Arabs said no and went to war. They lost. They went to war again in 1967. They lost again and with it, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. They went to war again in 1973 and lost again and with it, the Sinai and Gaza.
    Israel has handed back the Sinai, in exchange for peace with Egypt and has moved out of Gaza. There has been no peace with Gaza – just continuous missiles and terror attacks.
    The clock cannot be turned back, but the Palestinian Arabs could have infinitely better lives than they have now, but not if they continue to hit at Israel.
    Things cannot be the same as they were in ’48, ’67 or even ’73 – the world has moved on. The Palestinian Arabs can either accept that and decide to change their lives, or they can continue the ‘struggle’. Only they can decide.

    Of course after the 1948 war, all Jews were banished from Jerusalem by the Jordanians and their holy places destroyed, not to be reinstated until 1967. Israel allows access to all Musilm holy sites in Jerusalem.

    I feel very sorry for innocent Palestinians. They have crap lives and the worst possible leaders in the world, who not only steal from them, keep them in poverty and under threat of torture and worse, but actually take their children for use as human shields, or suicide bombers.
    And did you know that under an Arab League policy, formulated in the late 1940′s, Palestinian Arabs living as refugees in any Arab state, cannot have a passport, citizenship, meaningful employment or in many cases, health care or education? They are the lepers of the Arab world and are treated appallingly by their ‘brother’ Arabs including filthy rich countries like UAE, Qatar & Kuwait.
    Strangely enough, Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank, have better healthcare, education and life expectancy than Arabs living in the surrounding states.

    Reply
  • Well done Mr Murdoch. I dont like you but you were right to say he was wrong. The cartoon was wrong, especially on the day that it was.

    BTW, Murdoch is not a Jew, he is in fact Catholic.

    Reply
    • Apology is all well and good, but there should be sacking as well. This was published on Holocaust Remembrance Day so thee was a clear intention to offend.

      Reply
    • The crimes in Gaza are sinful and questioning Israel’s occupation and slaughtering there is just as valid as the questioning of the Nazi’s evil killing of Jews.
      Fascism is evil and still rife. Questions most certainly need to be asked. Who exactly is above the law?

      Reply
    • An apology from Murdoch is like getting a burger with a hair in it.

      Reply
    • The problem, Mick, is that it offends all Jews, not just pro-Israeli Zionist Jews. If it was done on another day, then fair enough. But to publish it on a day of commemoration for the worst atrocity in history is, in my mind, not attacking simply Israel and her government, but all Jews everywhere, including those who oppose the existence of Israel (and yes, there are many Jews who oppose the existence of Israel such as Neturei Karta and Satmar Rav).

      Reply
    • Lenin and Trotsky murdered 20 million christians in their purge during the RED revolution. 20 million.

      Reply
  • The apology is too little, too late as it’s not as if the “cartoon” magically appeared without prior approval and knowing there would be a flurrystorm of anger towards it.
    Please tell me where these so-called Palestinians were in 1880?
    Please tell me how they have helped Ireland?
    Please explain to me how continually shooting rockets into Israel and not at military areas either is helping any possibility of peace?
    Please tell me how Israel which is the only true democracy in the Middle East is the enemy here when it is the only country Irish can safely practice their Catholicism/Christianity or have you not heard about the torture and murder of Christians by your friends?
    Please explain the benefit of so many Irish aligning themselves with a cause that still sees them as infidels in the end?
    If Israel was the brutal nation some of you claim it to be, why is it that Palestinian victims are often treated by Israeli doctors who do not (as they should not) treat them any differently?
    Could a Jew be saved in the West Bank?
    Could Muslim girls openly enjoy shopping at a mall or sipping a coffee at the local cafe without possible punishment at home?
    Can Muslims and Jews enjoy a day at the beach together?
    Oh, yeah only in Israel.

    Reply
  • How many died in the Irish famine Mr. Cribbons? We have records of how many people were exterminated at death camps during WWII as well as those who died from starvation, typhus and torture. Surely, you cannot be so ignorant.

    Reply
  • ‘Jewish community leaders were disturbed by the parallels of Nazi anti Jewish sentiment’. And so they should be, they are scarcely better themselves with their persecution of Palestinians.

    Reply
    • Seriously Mr Blake. Are you comparing the murder of Millions of people by the Nazis to what is happening in Israel/Palestine. That is hugely ignorant of you.

      Reply
    • Scarcely better than the Nazis? What a moronic and ignorant comment.

      Reply
    • Ah the armchair warriors judging others who they know nothing about nor why and how any of it started

      Reply
    • An ignorant comment, Simon Blake. I attended the Holocaust Commemoration in the Mansion House, Dublin, & it was a very moving experience where ALL victims of the Nazis were remembered. Your comment is ignorant. I don’t like your comment & I don’t accept it. Please go educate yourself. It is Muslims who are persecuting the Palestinians. Using them as an excuse to attack Jews & Israel.

      Reply
    • Declan 93% of Palestinians are Muslims so to quote you “go educate yourself”

      Reply
    • Muslim leaders use the Palestinian clause for their own ends. And that end is to keep peace at bay & many in the West fall for it blaming the Israelis for all the ills in the area.

      Reply
    • @ Tomas. So your rationale is if its under 6 million its ok? Or did I read you wrong?

      Reply
    • JayK 29/01/13 #

      Th Israelis are nothing like the Nazis. Apart from the ethnic cleansing, ghettoization and State-sponsored racism and genocide. Israel have neve used poison gas against Palenstinian civilians. What else is necessary for the Nazi comparison? It even seems the West following a policy of Appeasement.

      http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/43/a43r058.htm

      Reply
    • JayK 29/01/13 #

      *even used poison gas. Wish I could edit comments with typos.

      Reply
    • Simon, while you are right to describe the actions of the Israeli state towards the Palestinians as “persecution”, it is entirely wrong to equate this persecution with the actions of the Nazis who deliberately sought to eliminate the Jewish population of Europe by mass murder.

      Reply
    • You should see the poster (Abby Kelly’s) comments on Jews and Alan Shatter on the gay marriage article from yesterday. She posted a David Duke (KKK Grand Wizard) video and claims Alan Shatter is ethnically cleansing Ireland because he’s letting in immigrants. She then goes to reject the “absurd notion” she is racist or anti-Semitic lol. Sad part people have posted David Duke videos on here before and they have gotten over 30 likes.

      Reply
    • You can be an appologist if you wish for Israel. But when you have individuals like Gilad Sharon (Ariel Sharon’s son) publicly calling as a member if the opposition party to flatten gaza, I don’t feel irresponsible for highlighting the more than passing similarity to what happened European Jews during the third reich.

      Reply
    • Not a word from the anti-Israel brigade when Iran murders thousands of green revolution students or when Syria bombs refugee camps or 100′s are gunned down in Egypt or Saudi Arabia executes people for witchcraft. But at the mere mention of Jews (not even Israel, the Journal is flooded with bigoted &/or mis-informed criticism of Israel.

      Reply
    • No wonder the world is a right mess with conspiracy theories like that indeed. Judging from the majority of comments on here, Jews (not Israelis in many cases) are as bad as Germans in World War II, who murdered 6 million undesirables, primarily Jews. However the real blame for this horrendous genocide, according to the comment above, lies also with the Jews, who inexplicably enough bankrolled the almost obliteration of their own people. And then this comment gets a many green thumbs as red from the readers on this site. Its hard not to despair.

      Reply
  • Ok,
    We now have comments saying you can’t trust Jewish sources, mocking the Holocaust.

    Where are the moderators? Why do they not adhere to their own guidelines ?

    Reply
    • Agree with you to a point. I find holocaust denial appalling. That said, there are regularly viciously Islamophobic comment on here and they are allowed to stay too, so don’t go growing a persecution complex!

      By the way, I’ve never seen you object to hateful comments about Arabs or Muslims here, and they regularly appear. You might want to ask yourself why that is.

      Reply
    • Read what he says “I obviously dont trust Jewish sources”

      Reply
    • Interesting how pro-Israeli commentators simply *must* be on the Mossad payroll and their statements dismissed as propaganda. By that logic is it a safe bet to imply the anti-Israeli (I would say ‘pro-Palestinian’ but it’s a poorly kept secret which of the two sentiments prevails) commentators are in bed with the IPSC?

      Paddy Power’s still open!

      Reply
    • Folks, a number of comments have already been removed from this article for breaking the comments policy (see here. As per usual, we’d ask all readers to flag any comment which they think are dodgy (i.e. contain hate speech, personal abuse or anything else which breaks the guidelines) by pressing the ‘Report this comment’ button which you can see above the thumbs on every comment. It’s the fastest way to get the attention of a member of staff who can take action if necessary.

      Reply
    • Ms Bohan, every time TheJournal posts an article related to Israel, the same dog & pony show breaks out, with the same fecal matter being propelled like an online chimps tea party and it appears – from this perspective – that very little is moderated and even less is resolved until many hours later. Usually until the holocaust denial posts appear.

      In the interests of impartiality I would beseech you to take greater admin observation and moderation in Israel related posts in future. Thanks.

      Reply
    • Thanks for that Barry. We’re very clear about our moderation of the site: we don’t have the resources to monitor the thousands of comments left on the site every day so we do ask readers to be pro-active and report any comments which appear to break the comments policy. Like I said, it’s the best and fastest way to get a situation resolved.

      As for the discussion itself, I’d ask all commenters to be responsible for what they post. Articles about Israel/Palestine often attract obvious trolls who post something antagonistic in the hope of provoking a response. The best response to comments like that is simply to ignore them and press the ‘Report this comment’ button instead of engaging with them.

      Reply
  • I just wish that the world would reject the continued attempts of Israel to equate criticism of their foreign/domestic policies to anti-semitism. Israel is not Judaism and Judaism is not Israel.

    Reply
    • Absolutely right. This idea that every comment on the disgraceful actions of Israel is anti-semitic is tripe.

      Reply
    • I hear this all the time, from those who criticise Israel, (which is fair enough if you want to) that critisim of Israel is not anti Semitic,
      That is also true, but I don’t hear people say that all criticism of Israel is anti Semitic.
      It seems the pro Pal community is more obsessed with anti semitism and watering it down than Jews in my opinion.

      Singling out Israel and holding it to a standard that NO other nation on the earth is held to, is anti Semitic. Using images of Israeli leaders in nazi style cartoons is anti Semitic. Comparing Israel to the Nazi’s under the EU definition of anti semitism is anti Semitic.

      But wait for it now, the pro Pal guys will roll in with, the Jews aren’t the only Semites. (why they feel the need to water the meaning down again is worrying) but they are true but anti Semitism in the English language means Jew hatred , if you have an issue with the word take it up with a higher authority don’t try water down its meaning.
      Anti semitism is alive and well in Europe. From Malmo in Sweden to Paris, it’s alarming and it seems like the most tolerated form of racial hatred in the world.
      Many people hate Jews and hide behind political correct terms like Zionism , but all that has happened is the old anti Semitic phrases have been pc’ed up a bit, So now where the anti Semitic phrase used to have the word “Jew” it has “Zionist”.

      Reply
    • Singling out Israel and holding it to a standard that NO other nation on the earth is held to, is anti Semitic. Using images of Israeli leaders in nazi style cartoons is anti Semitic. Comparing Israel to the Nazi’s under the EU definition of anti semitism is anti Semitic.

      You see, this is the problem: none of those things are anti-Semitic. The first is an example of double standards, the second and third are inaccurate analogies. All this stuff is par for the course in open democratic discourse and labelling them all anti-Semitic is a pretty transparent attempt to silence opponents.

      Reply
    • The claims of anti semitism at criticism of Israeli government policies have done more to water down its power than anything else. Some Israeli politicians use the holocaust and its victims in the most cynical way, Nethanyahu for example announcing during cast lead how we will not march to the gas chambers again .

      Reply
  • once again, just a few facts in the face of a lot of lies about Israel.
    The dictionary definition of genocide is the wiping out of a people. Since 1948 when the State of Israel was recognised by the UN, Palestinian Arabs have increased in number from approx 800,000, to approx 7,000,000.
    Either Israel is doing a terrible job of effecting a genocide, or you have your definition wrong.
    By comparison, Nazi Germany decimated European Jewry, industrially murdering approximately 6,000,000 people. That WAS genocide.
    Every death that occured during the last Gaza conflict is a death that could have been avoided. Israel has one of the most powerful military machines in the world. Why would Hamas continue to antagonise it by firing rockets at its civilians unless they wanted a reaction?
    Hamas deliberately and cynically engineered this conflict as a way of diverting attention away from Syria and Iran. It fires missiles from within inhabited civilian areas specifically to invite retaliation that will cause casualties. Those casualties are then held up to the world as examples of Israeli aggression, and those who want to find fault with Israel are given a cause to promote

    Reply
  • I’ve had to say it before & I’m sure I’ll have to say it again but comparing the treatment of the Jews in World War II to what is happening to the Palestinians is just wrong. There are no death camps, there is no ethnic cleansing. In Ireland a lot of people assume that Israel is a theocratic state but in reality it is one of the most secular nations in the world. When Israeli leaders refer to the Jewish people, they are more referring to their race and heritage rather than religion.
    Saying the Jews have no claim to the land is akin to saying that we have no claim to Ireland. The land that is now Israel has been occupied by foreign powers at least 10 times over the centuries. Babylonian, Persian, Hellenistic, Roman, Byzantine, Arab, European Crusaders, Mamluk, Ottoman and British. The Jews were persecuted and exiled in the majority of these occupations. So yes they do deserve their land to live in and this is based on historical fact, not what is written in the bible. Which by the way the Jews don’t read in any case.
    Lastly Israel is one of the few nations on the planet that has gained territory through defending itself. Since the state was created in 1948 it has been attacked four times by its Arab neighbours in massive offensives. Each time it successfully defended itself and it withdrew its army from most of the areas captured. It is also worth noting that Israel is surrounded on all sides by 17 Arab states that would, were it not for Israel’s western allies, destroy the nation. Also worth pointing out that that Israel is the only true democracy in the region, where as its neighbours are either theocratic monarchies or military controlled “republics” Israel has a population of under 7 million where as the nations that surround it (and are loosely allied) have a combined population of over 300 million. So I don’t blame the Israelis for defending their nation so aggressively when the time calls for it.
    If the Arabs put down their weapons today there would be no more violence. If the Israelis put down their weapons today there would be no more Israel – I don’t remember who said that, but it still stands very true.

    Reply
  • Reply
  • I am disturbed by your need for a figure, what is too few and how many is too many and enough for you to speak out? Let me tell you about victims of the holacoust. In addition to those slaughtered simply for being Jewish there are family members who were so traumatized that a wave of suicides occurred in addition to survivors left infertile by physical trauma. Many of the living passed on horrific mental health problems to the second and even third generation, destroying lives and souls. So can we count the victims? And don’t even try to tell me the Palistinian people are going through anything remotely like systematic annihilation! The issue will be resolved as soon as Hamas and the likes decide they want their own country more then they want to destroy Israel!

    Reply
  • I would like to point out that despite the gross offensive nature of this cartoon, the cartoonist has not received death threats,does not have to go into hiding and there have not been any violent protests anywhere. This is why Israel is proud to be the only working democracy in the Middle East.

    Reply
  • Rudolf Höss was the head of operations in Auschwitz. I’m pretty sure he knew what went on there. As for the discrepancies in the figures for the amount of people murdered in Auschwitz – I never claimed to know how or why those figures were arrived at. But the fact that it was Jewish and/or Israeli researchers who revised down the figure should say something.

    Reply
  • There are many similarities between Israel and the Nazis. Lets not forget, the Nazis didn’t begin with killing jews. The killings were the culmination of 12 years of state terrorism against jews by the nazi government. Israel is now travelling the same road with illegal land grabs, military incursions, oaths of allegiance to the sectarian Jewish state aimed at disenfranchising Israeli arabs and the building of walls. Surely this is a carbon copy of the WWII ghettos in warsaw etc.

    Reply
  • Ross, the figure of 4 million was given by German officers at the Nuremberg trials. Rudolf Höss stated it was 3 million. The lower figure was given after careful analysis of documentation by the German authorities. That’s what history is about – learning, revising, researching.

    Reply
  • Alien8 29/01/13 #

    The political cartoon used a valid form of commentary, and should never be apologised for. It was hopefully offensive to the Israeli government, although not in way that was put across by the lobby groups. The continued use of history to prevent satire and political commentary is exactly what we experienced with the Mohammed cartoons which was rightly condemned.

    I don’t think anybody this side of the 12th century thinks that blood libels are a part of Judaism, but it is dragged out by right wing groups on both side. If only all news reports would edit commentary to not include any reference to ‘holocaust’, ‘blood libel’ or ‘pogrom’ and we would be able to see what is really happening, and make up our own minds, which is a blatant injustice to all Palestinians.

    Reply
    • I agree with your opinion of the cartoon. I do believe that it wasn’t the wisest of decisions to publish it on the day that remembers 6 million murders.

      Reply
    • Valid as Khaled Mshaal announcing in Gaza:

      Khaled Mashaal
      ” Palestine is ours from the river to the sea and from the south to the north. There will be no concession on an inch of the land,” 2012

      “Hamas must declare that it was formed to eliminate the state of Israel, and that Israel is an entity that must disappear. [Hamas] should declare that its political, military, and social plan is the liberation of all the land by means of resistance”
      The words of Kana’an ‘Obeid, an advisor to the Hamas government in Gaza, in an October 8, 2012 article in the Hamas newspaper Al-Risala.

      Hamas Charter

      Article Seven

      The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him! This will not apply to the Gharqad, which is a Jewish tree (cited by Bukhari and Muslim).

      Article 7 is taken from Hadith Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177
      Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.

      “Palestine is Islamic, and not an Islamic emirate, from the river to the sea, that unites the Palestinians. Jews have no right in it, with the exception of those who lived on the land of Palestine before World War I.”

      (Hamas official Halil Al-Hayya, Al-Hayat newspaper, November 11, 2010)

      “We have liberated Gaza, but have we recognized Israel? Have we given up our lands occupied in 1948? We demand the liberation of the West Bank, and the establishment of a state in the West Bank and Gaza, with Jerusalem as its capital – but without recognizing [Israel]. This is the key – without recognizing the Israeli enemy on a single inch of land. …
      “Our plan for this stage is to liberate any inch of Palestinian land, and to establish a state on it. Our ultimate plan is [to have] Palestine in its entirety. I say this loud and clear so that nobody will accuse me of employing political tactics. We will not recognize the Israeli enemy. ”

      (Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar, Future News TV, June 15, 2010, Source: MEMRI.org)

      Reply
  • Recommended reading for the confused: The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering by Norman Finkelstein.

    The author is Jewish, so you’ll have to come up with a different label for him!

    Reply
  • Will the Dirty Digger aPologise for his newspapers’ anti-Irish attitudes over the years, particularly in the 1980s?
    Eg
    The Sun’s calls
    > To boycott Irish goods
    > To bring in passport controls for Irish people entering Britain
    And of course there is still Hillsborough.

    Reply
    • @Barry

      No chance of that…we’re just the oul Irish potatoe farmers and newspapers are allowed slag us off and make biggoted comments toward us without any ‘outrage’ or repercussion.

      Reply
    • KEVIN.N 29/01/13 #

      He’s of Irish descent and employs a lot of Irish-Americans (most famously Fox News), Australia, and Brits of Irish descent (most famously Piers Morgan who was a newspaper editor).

      Reply
  • Murdoch is, in my opinion, a far-right fanatic. He has come down on the side of militarists, industrialists and facists the world over. Having Murdoch kiss your arse would give your arse a bad reputation, in my opinion.

    Reply
  • A source should be judged on the rigour of its methodology, not whether or not it’s a “Jewish source”.

    Reply
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gsqj3HH4NVk

    I suppose this guy is anti-Semitic

    Reply
  • Typical outrageous anti-semitism.

    Reply
  • It’s not just the Palestinians who say Israel’s occupation of Palestine is a land grab. International Law deems it a land grab. Blood red mortar? Has Israel not spilt the blood of the occupied men, women and children? Criticism of Zionist crimes is not anti semitism. You are disturbingly quick to report Israel’s spin as accepted fact.

    Reply

Add New Comment