TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

San Francisco transport officials block phone signals to hinder protest

Mobile phone service in San Francisco’s downtown subway stations was shut off to prevent a repeat of a protest in July which ended in arrests. The protest was sparked when police shot a man.

A protester reads an instruction sheet before a previous demonstration in July began at the Civic Center BART station in San Francisco
A protester reads an instruction sheet before a previous demonstration in July began at the Civic Center BART station in San Francisco
Image: AP Photo/Eric Risberg

MOBILE PHONE RECEPTION was blocked in San Francisco train stations for three hours on Thursday, as officials attempted to disrupt planned demonstrations over a police shooting.

Officials with the Bay Area Rapid Transit system, better known as BART, said that they turned off electricity to cellular towers in four stations from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.

The move was made after BART learned that protesters planned to use mobile devices to coordinate a demonstration on train platforms.

The tactic drew comparisons to those used by the former president of Egypt to squelch protests demanding an end to his authoritarian rule.

Authorities there cut Internet and phone services in the country for days earlier this year.

“BART officials are showing themselves to be of a mind with the former president of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation said on its website.

The American Civil Liberties Union criticized the tactic, saying on its blog that it was the “wrong response to political protests.”

BART officials were confident the cellphone disruptions were legal. They said in a statement that it’s illegal to demonstrate on the platform or aboard the trains, and that it has set aside special areas for demonstrations.

The demonstration failed to develop. “We had a commute that was safe and without disruption,” said BART spokesman Jim Allison.

The demonstrators were protesting the 3 July shooting of Charles Blair Hill by BART police, who claimed Hill came at them with a knife.

Several people were arrested when an 11 July demonstration disrupted service during the rush-hour commute and prompted the closing of BART’s Civic Center station.

BART workers remove a man who climbed on top of a train during a protest at the Civic Center BART station in San Francisco on Monday 11 July. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)

San Francisco’s KTVU reports that questions have been raised over the decision to cut the phone service, with at least one member of BART’s board of directors demanding a review of the decision.

Lynette Sweet has expressed concern about what would have happened in the event of an emergency.

BART’s deputy police chief has said that they had received intelligence that protesters may have been planning something violent.

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that it’s believed that this is the first time such action has been taken in the US.

Yesterday British Prime Minister David Cameron said that his government and intelligence services were working with “industry” sources to look into blocking communication via certain online services being used to organise criminal activities, after services like Facebook, Blackberry Messenger and Twitter were blamed for fuelling the riots in the UK.

- Additional reporting by AP

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (8 Comments)

  • Exactly my thoughts/worries Mark. You’ll see this happening in the UK soon as well.

    Reply
  • Squelch a protest? Sounds a bit wet.

    Reply
  • This was an illegal act by BART. Also pretty crazy if you needed to make emergency calls. Not to mention the fact that authoritarian regimes will cite such examples as futher excuse to suppress the use of social media and communication tools for political expression.

    This is something we should all be worried about and watch carefully, as states try to enclose and control our ability to communication with each other.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903918104576502214236127064.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    Reply
  • They shouldnt be able to do things like this

    Reply
  • Is this not in breach of the American constitution -
    The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution – part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law, "… abridging the freedom of speech… interfering with the right to peaceably assemble…"

    Reply
  • google:- y a p p e r z a p p e r

    Reply
  • Communication is a very vital tool in today modern democracy what the authorities should do is Reformation,Rehabilitation,CO-Ordination,Proper Dissemination of information on no accout should people be cut off via internet phone or cable information is very essential if the Government do what is right there will be no protests everyone will go about his or her business so the killing should stop human life is sacrosant.

    Reply
  • Disgraceful, anti democratic move by BART and I suspect that we’ll see more of it whenever a legitimate protest is called. Every protest will somehow have some "intelligence" information suggesting disorder. America authorities and corporations were never really keen on the people actually having a voice.

    I wouldn’t be surprised that the emphasis on social media in the UK by the authorities is just a pretext to curb the public using social media channels that they can’t control.

    Anyway, the good news is that democratic action happened in days before the Internet and the mobile phone. People will have to Old Skool!

    Reply

Add New Comment