TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Smithwick Tribunal looks for more time as unexpected witnesses come forward

Judge Peter Smithwick has sought an extra five months before submitting his final report on possible Garda collusion in the deaths of two RUC officers in 1989.

Justice Peter Smithwick in 2011
Justice Peter Smithwick in 2011
Image: Niall Carson/PA Archive/Press Association Images

THE SMITHWICK TRIBUNAL has sought an extra five months to hear witnesses and produce its final report.

After being granted a previous extension, Judge Peter Smithwick was due to publish the final report of his inquiry into possible Garda collusion in the killing of two senior RUC officers at the end of this month but has now asked this deadline to be pushed back to October 2012.

In his request for the extension, he told Justice Minister Alan Shatter that a number of witnesses not expected to come forward have done so in recent weeks.

A delay to the appearance of one former Garda – a particularly important witness – has also been accepted, pushing the public hearings past their expected completion date.

The Department of Justice confirmed for TheJournal.ie today that the chairman of the tribunal has written to the clerk of the Dáil requesting leave to work until the end of October.

Alan Shatter is to bring the matter to the Government shortly for its consideration.

“It is a matter for the Dáil and Seanad to decide on the terms of reference of the Tribunal and any amendment that might be made,” according to a spokesperson for the Minister.

The Tribunal was established in March 2005 to examine suggestions that members of An Garda Síochána colluded in the fatal shootings of RUC Chief Superintendent Harry Breen and RUC Superintendent Robert Buchanan on the 20 March 1989.

The men were killed by the IRA just minutes after leaving a meeting in Dundalk Garda Station outside the village of Jonesborough. It has been claimed that the shooters were tipped off about the route the men had planned to take.

100 sittings, 190 witnesses, €8 million

Judge Smithwick has already received an extension to push back the publication of his final report from last November to the end of this month.

Public sittings only began last June in Dublin but since then 190 witnesses have been called.

In his letter, Justice Smithwick said the tribunal was on track to complete public hearings by the end of this month but a number of unexpected scenarios had taken place.

Over 100 sitting days, substantive evidence has been heard from 18 witnesses. Included in that witness list is ‘Witness 82′, a former member of the British army intelligence division, who was not expected to volunteer information. Following the appearance of another intelligence officer Ian Hurst, he decided to give evidence in relation to a number of matters raised during that private session.

In recent days, two former RUC Special Branch officers, described as “very significant” by Judge Smithwick, have also changed their minds and decided to give evidence.

‘Witness Z’ gave important information to the tribunal through a video link from Northern Ireland on 11 May, while another is expected to be heard sometime this week. The tribunal also expects to be in contact with a third ex-RUC officer in the coming days. All three have requested anonymity.

Another reason for the extension request is a possible delay being incurred because of the medical status of key witness Detective Sergeant Owen Corrigan. Other witnesses have named Corrigan as the mole leaking information from the Gardaí to the IRA.

He is the last substantive witness scheduled to give evidence and was due to begin on 15 May but his counsel made an application to delay the sitting for two weeks on medical grounds.

Judge Smithwick said he acceded to the request as he was “mindful of Mr Corrigan’s right to fair procedures”.

As matters stand, I hope that Mr Corrigan can attend to give evidence in two or three weeks’ time, but this will obviously depend on his medical condition. If necessary, in the light of his condition, I am prepared to take his evidence in short periods rather than full day sessions.

Last week, the Tribunal heard that former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and her Northern Ireland Secretary Tom King were told to “play down” allegations of collusion following the ambush in 1989. BBC News reported on the briefing notes presented to the politicians. They were also advised not to give the impression about “only really” caring about security forces. In the three months prior to the murders, 25 people had been killed as a result of the Troubles.

Smithwick expects his report to take three months to write and a further month to edit, index and proof-read. He also asked the Dáil and Seanad to be mindful of the “significant reduction in the running costs” of the tribunal once public hearings are concluded as stenographer, counsel and office space costs will be reduced.

The seven-year inquiry has cost more than €8 million so far.

Read: Judge Peter Smithwick’s letter in full>

Read next:

Comments (8 Comments)

  • When are we going to get a Tribunal into the Dublin/Monaghan bombings.. I have no issue with this tribunal, but Dublin/Monaghan atrocity was the single worst day in the entire troubles with 32 murdered (blown to pieces) and at least 250 injured (many with arms and legs blown off). Why will the FFg/Labour/FF parties not start the tribunal and get the British Government to either support it, or have them called out as hostile witnesses who refuse to give evidence. Do the murders of all these people not mean something to the Irish Government? The relatives of the Dublin/Monaghan bombings were refused access to the Queen during her visit to Ireland. What signal does that send out to the victims and their families?

    Reply
    • Fagan's 21/05/12 #

      The relatives of the victims of Dublin and Monaghan were harassed and followed by the Special Branch for years, for daring to ask why the Govt. of the day stopped the investigation after only 6 weeks, why no steps were taken to arrest the people involved.

      Reply
  • I have no problem with this continuing on the following condition.

    If they feel that the new evidence is important, then so be it, but no extra money. They can take as long as they like on the original budget.

    Reply
  • this whole thing keeps coming across as a money making scam.why not set up a tribunal to check out the tribunals .

    Reply
  • What a scam, Smithwick and his team are raking it in. This tribunal is just a waste of time, it’s of no significance and it’s only happening because of that Walter Mitty character Ingram (or whatever he’s calling himself this week) making outlandish claims to keep himself in the media spotlight. Close down this charade and start looking at the Dublin & Monaghan bombings where there was a real conspiracy.

    Reply
  • Con

    That is my point.

    If they are truly interested in the pursuit of justice then let them continue. They have been paid more than enough to date.

    If they just wish to prolong things to earn even MORE money, then stop now. Publish what they have found to date .They can show their true colours and motives.

    I am all for a person being paid a fair wage for their work, but the legal teams at the tribunals have been paid ridiculous amounts of money.

    In future tribunals should have a fixed budget set at the start.

    Reply
  • There will never be a tribunal into the Dublin/Monaghan bombings because the government of the day knew what the government today knows. Elements of the British military & security services had a hand in these atrocities, whether sanctioned by Whitehall or not will never be known but irregardless these bombings would have constituted an act of war for which the republic of the day was in no position to prosecute. Justice will probably never be served in our lifetime but I hope I’m wrong.

    Reply

Add New Comment