TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Suicide bomber kills 36 in Afghanistan

The deadly attack targeted people gathering at a mosque to celebrate the Eid al-Adha holiday.

An Afghan boy, who lost his father in a suicide attack, walks around a hospital in a daze in Maymana, Faryab province north west of Kabul, Afghanistan, Friday, Oct. 26, 2012.
An Afghan boy, who lost his father in a suicide attack, walks around a hospital in a daze in Maymana, Faryab province north west of Kabul, Afghanistan, Friday, Oct. 26, 2012.
Image: AP Photo/Qawtbuddin Khan

A SUICIDE BOMBER blew himself up outside a mosque in northern Afghanistan on Friday, killing 36 people and wounding 23, officials said.

The attack in the town of Maymana, capital of northern Faryab province, came as people were gathering at the mosque to celebrate the Eid al-Adha holiday.

Top provincial officials, including the governor and the police chief, were inside the building when the bomber set off his explosives outside, where a large crowd had gathered, officials said. The officials were not hurt, but most of the dead were police officers and soldiers.

“The targets of the bomber were all the officials inside the mosque,” Deputy Governor Abdul Satar Barez said. He said the dead included 14 civilians.

“There was blood and dead bodies everywhere,” said Khaled, a doctor who was in the mosque at the time of the blast. “It was a massacre,” said Khaled, who like many Afghans uses only one name.

One of the deadliest attacks

Video from the scene showed the motionless bodies of several soldiers and policemen lying next to their vehicles parked on a tree-lined avenue of the city, located about 500 kilometres northwest of Kabul. On the sidewalk, a number of civilians lay along the mosque’s outer wall, some writhing and moaning in pain.

It appeared to be the deadliest suicide attack in recent months.

On Sept. 4, 25 civilians were killed and more than 35 wounded in Nanghar province, and on Sept. 1, 12 people were killed and 47 wounded in a suicide attack in Wardak province.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai strongly condemned the attack, saying that those who carried it out were “enemies of Islam and humanity.”

He said in a statement that 36 people died in the blast and 23 were injured.

The attack came as Karzai was urging Taliban insurgents “to stop killing other Afghans.”

In his Eid al-Adha message to the nation on Friday morning, Karzai called on the insurgents to “stop the destruction of our mosques, hospitals and schools.”

The United Nations says that Taliban attacks account for the vast majority of civilian casualties in the 11-year war. The insurgents routinely deny that they are responsible for attacks on civilians, saying they target only foreign troops or members of the Afghan security forces.

On Wednesday, Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar urged his fighters to “pay full attention to the prevention of civilian casualties,” saying the enemy was trying to blame them on the insurgents.

Also Friday, the Taliban claimed responsibility for killing two American service members in southern Uruzgan province, in what may have been the latest insider attack against Western troops.

Undermined trust

In an emailed statement, Taliban spokesman Yusuf Ahmadi said a member of the Afghan security forces shot the two men the day before, then escaped to join the insurgents.

A spate of insider attacks has undermined trust between international troops and Afghan army and police, further weakened public support for the 11-year war in NATO countries and increased calls for earlier withdrawals.

Maj. Lori Hodge, spokeswoman for US forces in Afghanistan, said on Thursday that authorities were trying to determine whether the latest attacker was a member of the Afghan security forces or an insurgent who donned a government uniform.

It was the second suspected insider attack in two days. On Wednesday, two British troops and an Afghan policeman were gunned down in Helmand province.

Before Thursday’s assault, 53 foreigners attached to the US-led coalition had been killed in attacks by Afghan soldiers or police this year.

Read: 15 wedding guests killed in roadside bomb in Afghanistan>

Read next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • It is just never ending . Life is cheap .Poor little boy in that photo . Sad .

    Reply
  • The cycle of violence goes on and on. No doubt someone will claim this as a victory, but how can they? when they look into that poor young lad’s eyes? I don’t think the West can stop this, only the Afghans themselves. leave them to sort their country our themselves, it probably means civil war, but every developed country has had that

    Reply
  • The picture of the child dressed in white splattered with blood is heart breaking, he was in the mosque with his dad to pray and now he is an orphan. It makes no sense,it serves no purpose what has the taliban gained by doing this ?

    Reply
  • All for his 72 virgins. Incredible how some people can believe in that and use it to motivate themselves to commit hideous acts of murder on such a grand scale!

    Reply
  • Totally agree Karl…the Karzai gov and the taliban are using Islam as an excuse for these acts of violence. The Afghans need to be allowed to sort out their own problems without foreign interference.

    Reply
    • Hear hear.

      Reply
    • Ashling Islam is violent and thrives on conflict it only peaceful when you submit to it unconditionally. Stephen Weinberg said “With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil—that takes religion.
      What could motivate people to go batshit crazy riot and kill people because of a few drawings or an infantile stupid film…religion.

      Reply
  • The pira doesn’t exist anymore Kevin. To say that the IRA in any of it’s forms is or was not anti protestant is laughable.

    Reply
    • *Is not

      Reply
    • The loyalist paramilitaries did not serve the role of the IRA’s enemy in war. The British security forces filled that role, and fought according to the rules of war.
      The loyalists did not fight according to the rules of war. They killed almost exclusively innocent civilians, and not by accident either. These were not errors. These were not “collateral damage” – they were the actual targets.

      The loyalist paramilitaries were Protestant religious death squads – killing and torturing innocent, uninvolved civilians for religion. We were supposed to believe that both sides were doing this of course, but in retrospect that was unthinking politically-correct humbug, one of many such devices over the last 30 years to avoid thinking about the conflict. Anti-Catholicism has been just as real in Britain’s history as anti-semitism has been in Europe’s, and it could so easily have ended in the horrors of the camps (as have in fact been proposed by a number of loyalist thinkers).

      The similarities of virulent fundamentalist anti-Catholicism and anti-semitism: The “Irish” problem, like the “Jewish” problem, was never a problem with the Irish. It was a problem with virulent fundamentalist anti-Catholicism, a problem that still exists in the unionist population today. Northern anti-Catholicism is the fundamental cause of 30 years of conflict.

      The similarities of the loyalists and the Palestinians: Loyalists have killed and tortured almost exclusively random Catholic civilians. This is because they are motivated by a fundamental racism that their opponents do not feel. Any objective historian will be struck by the fact that, like in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the republicans generally tried to hit military targets, while the loyalist supporters would cheer the killing of any random civilian. To observe this does not mean one supports either the republicans or the Israelis. It is to observe that fundamental beliefs come out in the way one wages war.

      http://markhumphrys.com/ni.unionists.html

      Reply
    • The Catholic Church’s interest in Ireland like everywhere else was and remains power. You try to abdicate the Catholic Church from it’s role in using the Irish people as a pawn in it’s power games. Anti – Catholicism in the UK and most societies in based on opposition to it’s dogma. Like in the rest of the world my God is better than your God and in many cases if you do not agree I will kill you because my God told me to. Look no further than Rwanda the most Catholic country in Africa to see the RCC in action. Glad that you proclaim to be an Atheist also that you agree that the Catholic Church is a horrible/evil institution. I think the same of all religions as they poison everything. For example: Suicide bombers are exclusively the product of the religious.

      Reply
    • I agree. My point comes down to power and the anti-Irish propaganda by Britain. The Pope supported William of Orange in the Battle of Boyne. It’s beyond me how Irish-Catholics didn’t form their own church and how Valera was allowed to give the CC such a high/special position in Ireland.

      Reply
    • De Valera like Hitler as aspiring politicians cut a deal with the RCC to ease the rise to power.

      Reply
    • Valera is extremely over-rated for some reason in Ireland. He brought a lot of misery on Ireland and is one of the worst political figures in Irish history in my opinion.

      Reply
  • @ Kevin Nasri – Yet again you cannot airbrush history to fit your particular political ideology. One word dismisses the entire Irish section of your cut, copy and pasted rant – Enniskillen. You try align the Catholics and the Jews, for your own very curious and dubious purposes, this despite the Catholic Church officially promoting anti-semitism since it’s inception. Even in the aftermath of and in the full knowledge of the horrors of the Holocaust the Catholic Church stood firm on it’s right to continue promote anti-semitism. Subject to immense worldwide public pressure it only rescinded it’s right to be “openly” anti-semitic in 1962.

    Reply
    • “Nasri”? You clearly don’t get the point; no one can deny the Catholic Church’s history. But Catholics and Jews were very much discriminated in the US in the past and very much in Great Britain. Catholic and Jewish Emancipations ring a bell? The KKK are fiercely anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish. Anti-Jew sentiments have been prominent in Catholicism and Protestantism (Martin Luther?).

      Reply
    • Anti-Catholicism in the British Isles has been based off of being anti-France/Spain. Also the fact that the British could not “civilize/upgrade” the Irish to be “normal”. The only reason the Irish stayed Catholic is in protest to being stripped of their lands and native culture not because they would like to be ruled by another tyrant. The so-called “rant” is written by an Atheist. I am Atheist also and could not agree anymore that the Catholic Church is a horrible/evil institution. The South is no longer religious; unfortunately the North still lives in the 1600s and is very fundamentalist when it comes to religion. If Britain would have not persecuted the Catholics and promoted such anti-Catholicism/anti-Irish propaganda there never would have so much bloodshed/conflict. I totally agree Kevin with your points on the Catholic Church. Mr. Humphrys has an interesting link on Christianity/Catholic Church you might like. http://markhumphrys.com/christianity.html

      Reply
  • May Allah be with them!

    Reply
    • Who ?

      Reply
    • What? Who? The people they were in the mosque worshiping! It’s sad to see people on this site do not like me passing on my condolences to fellow human beings but feel it is ok to laugh at our believes. It is like saying your IRAs killed for Jesus!

      Reply
    • The IRA is political not religious. The IRA is why Ireland is independent the PIRA are domestic terrorism and do not bomb in the name of Jesus. Islamism is worldwide terror and their goal is to conquer the planet and convert/kill, even blow themselves up for Allah and 72 virgins. The PIRA is not anti-Protestant and does not endorse any religion, they have made this clear. Every country has or had domestic terrorism at some point. Your example is moronic.

      Reply
    • Maybe it’s because if no-one be(lie)ved in Alla this child’s father would be alive.

      Reply
    • @ Abdul al Rawi “Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88 Narrated ‘Ursa: “The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).”

      Care to enlighten us?

      Reply
  • @ Kevin Niazi – You clearly don’t want to get the point; no one can deny the Catholic Church’s history of anti-semitism which was largely responsible for fostering worlwide discrimination towards to the Jewish people. To equate the suffering caused to same with anti Catholicism, mainly in response to it’s many power grabs, is absurd. Again another situation that highlights yet again the fact that religion poisons everything.

    Reply

Add New Comment