TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Suicide bombers kill 81 people at Quetta snooker hall

An earlier attack saw 11 people lose their lives.

A Pakistani child who was injured in a bomb blast is brought to a hospital for treatment in Quetta
A Pakistani child who was injured in a bomb blast is brought to a hospital for treatment in Quetta
Image: Arshad Butt/AP/Press Association Images

BOMB ATTACKS KILLED 92 people in Pakistan’s city of Quetta today.

After an earlier attack, during which 11 people lost their lives, twin suicide bombers targeted a snooker hall in the deadliest single attack in the country for nearly two years.

At least 81 people were killed and 121 wounded when the bombers blew themselves up at the crowded club in an area of the southwestern city dominated by members of the Shiite Muslim community, a senior police officer said.

It was one of the worst single attacks ever on the minority community, which account for around 20 per cent of Pakistan’s 180-million strong population.

It was the deadliest attack in Pakistan since twin suicide bombers killed 98 people outside a police training centre in the northwestern town of Shabqadar on 13 May 2011 – shortly after US troops killed Osama bin Laden.

The double suicide blasts came hours after a bomb ripped through a security forces’ vehicle in a crowded part of the city, killing 11 people and wounding dozens more.

Pakistan

Pakistani volunteers rush an injured victim from a bomb blast to a local hospital for treatment in Quetta. (Image: Arshad Butt/AP/Press Association Images)

At the snooker club the first suicide bomber struck inside the building, then 10 minutes later an attacker in a car outside blew himself up as police, media workers and rescue teams rushed to the site, said officer Mir Zubair Mehmood.

“The death toll has risen to 81 so far,” senior police official Mir Zubair Mehmood told a news conference, putting the number of wounded at 121.

“Both (attacks) were (carried out by) suicide bombers and the death toll could rise further,” he added.

Mehmood said the dead also included nine police personnel and a local television camera man. Several rescue workers were also killed in the attacks, he said.

According to the US-based Human Rights Watch, 2012 was the deadliest year on record for Shiites in Pakistan.

The organisation late Thursday called the government’s failure to protect the community, which account for around 20 percent of the population, “reprehensible and amounts to complicity in the barbaric slaughter of Pakistani citizens”.

People were seen wailing and crying beside the bodies lying on the ground, an AFP photographer said.

Pakistan

A Pakistani paramilitary soldier and local residents gather at the site of bomb blast in Quetta, Pakistan. (Image: Arshad Butt/AP/Press Association Images)

The bombings damaged several shops and nearby buildings. At least four vehicles of local ambulance service were destroyed. The blast site was also littered with the belongings of the victims.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility.

Quetta has been a flashpoint for attacks against Shiites, in particular those from the ethnic Hazara minority, as well as suffering from attacks linked to a separatist insurgency and Islamist militancy.

Police said the attacks disrupted power supplies and plunged the area into darkness that hampered rescue work.

Quetta is the capital of the province of Baluchistan, one of the most deprived parts of Pakistan but rich in natural gas and mineral deposits on the Afghan and Iranian borders.

In the earlier attack bombers had targeted Frontier Corps personnel, planting their device underneath an FC vehicle, a senior police investigator said.

“At least one FC personnel was killed and 10 others wounded, two of them seriously,” FC spokesman Murtaza Baig told AFP.

Bomb disposal official Abdul Razzaq said the bomb, packed with 20 to 25 kilograms of explosives, was detonated by remote control.

“I went out of my shop and saw a thick cloud of dust. I was very scared and saw people screaming in panic. There were dead bodies and injured people shouting for help,” said Allah Dad, a local shopkeeper.

Earlier: Bomb placed under security vehicle kills 11 in Pakistan

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • Lunatics

    Reply
  • such a needless waste of life and so violent .

    Reply
  • Christians killed Christians in Northern Ireland for years. It’s mad people kill. There’s a lot of hate out there.

    Reply
  • It is a disgusting barbaric act committed by ignorant savages.

    Reply
  • 80 odd innocent people killed, Imagine if this happened anywhere in USA or Europe, it would be non stop irish media coverage for weeks. But because it’s the middle east we barely bat an eyelid at this stage….

    Reply
  • Despite stories like this people will still complain the next time the US launches a strike to kill one of the leaders who order these atrocities

    Reply
    • And people like you won’t care that such drone strikes have killed countless civilians and not made anyone safer.

      Reply
    • How can you say they haven’t made anyone safer? They have certainly killed a lot of the leadership who would otherwise have continued to plan attacks like this. Has not stopped it I grant you but better than leaving these guys in peace to plot murder. I don’t dismiss the issue that drone strikes have killed civilians but at least the US does not start out with the intention to kill as many civilians as possible which is what these guys do. How would you combat them? They live in areas outside government control so can’t be arrested and they deliberately hide in among civilians for exactly the reason that a strike to kill them is likely to also kill innocents. Just shows what cowards they are. What’s your solution then?

      Reply
    • “I don’t dismiss the issue that drone strikes have killed civilians but at least the US does not start out with the intention to kill as many civilians as possible which is what these guys do.”

      This is so irrational. Intention is neither here nor there. The US has killed many multiples more innocents than the Taliban over the past decades or so. Do you think it matters to the victims families that they ‘didn’t mean it’?

      Reply
    • I think the point being made Khaosan is that no US soldier or drone pilot is ordered to attack a civilian building. Of course it happens from time to time, and yes there is no excuse for it and I know it makes no difference to the families of innocents killed accidentally by the US/Allied forces. I genuinely believe though that western military forces try prevent it as much as is possible.

      I wouldn’t be so disgusted by this if it was 81 soldiers or policemen murdered…they knew what they signed up for. But to target a bloody snooker hall, used by average joe and young kids….it makes me sick.

      Reply
    • @King

      It makes me sick to my stomach too. I just don’t buy this stuff about America being the ‘good guys’. The US is an imperialist power that does huge harm in the world.

      Reply
    • Khaosan. Intention is very relevant. Can’t you see the difference between someone who sets out to specifically kill as many civilians as possible and someone who kills civilians as a consequence of killing an enemy combatant? We can argue that the US should be more careful etc but its difficult when these guys live in civilian areas. Other bombing or sending in a special forces team could easily result in more deaths.

      I note you have not said how you would propose we combat these evil forces. it’s easy to be critical and the US never gets credit when it does good in the world such as using its military to provide aid around the world when there are natural disasters and when it uses its military to fight evil forces in Somalia or Bosnia / Kosovo when the rest of the world is too timid to act

      Reply
    • I support the US Army in Afghanistan as do most Afghans (which many Western left-wing extremists will never accept) who have suffered greatly under the terror/tyranny of the Taliban. People need to condemn the Pakistani Government not the US Government when it comes to drones. The Pakistani Government had the choice whether to allow them or not. The Pakistani Taliban like most evil cowards purposely hides amongst the most vulnerable in the tribal areas. Most of the terror in Afghanistan is coming out of Pakistan. It’s just like what Hamas does in Gaza by placing their offices in hospitals and terrorist cells out of Mosques. Long Live America!

      Reply
    • @ Gavin . out of interest , how would you describe Michael Collins tactics of guerilla warfare ? I’m honesty not trying to be clever or trying to put you down, just wonder how you conscious would perceive it ??

      Reply
    • KEVIN.N 11/01/13 #

      Rob how would you perceive the American rebels of 1776? What does a domestic conflict for independence have to do with a worldwide Islamic terror problem? All political movements whether justified, have criminals in them. You can’t possibly think Al Qaeda, Taliban, Hamas, etc. have any legitimacy at all? All these groups believe there will only be peace when the infidels are converted or killed. The enemy is the rest of the world. Muslims get in conflict with Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, Jews, Christians, Atheists, everyone around the world. Yet they play the victim card all the time. You’d think it would occur to them maybe we have the problem. (I am not referring to all Muslims)

      Reply
    • Rob. I would not equate the two at all to be honest. As far as I know Collins only ever attacked Crown forces and certainly never deliberately targeted to kill civilians. If these guys limited themselves to only attacking foreign soldiers then I could maybe have some respect for them but they seem keener to hit soft targets where they can kill as many fellow Muslims as possible

      Reply
  • Kevin how are you it’s been a while . My comment is purely an observation on the lack of consistency on the journals comments policy , they are very selective on whom they allow to be referred to as savages . I myself called another group of extremists who happen to be a different religion savages recently and had my comments deleted immediately .

    Reply
    • KEVIN.N 11/01/13 #

      I’m good, how are you John. Yeah I’ve noticed it too; in an article similar to this in the past they deleted comments with “savage” and people got annoyed. It just depends on the author/moderators (who are Journal.ie authors). Some delete it because they have an intuitive/psychic power on detecting “racist” comments against religious (which is an ideology) extremists lol. Some comments do have the tone sometimes but most of the time no. Some of the authors on here are extremely dictator like when it comes to comments that don’t align with their own politics or so-called “standards”.

      Reply
  • You hear these over liberal people moan and moan about u.s involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq and the drone strikes. In reality,the second they leave, all hell is going to break lose and there’s going to be ten times the civilian deaths.

    Reply
  • Religion is supposed to be a personal choice/ not a forced one, all religions can coexist peacefully with correct leadership. Religious and political leader’s brainwashing young easily lead martyrs does not achieve anything only anarchy, disruption,war and poverty while the winners of the war empty that country’s coffers. That’s the world’s history and future unless the west leads the way- Peaceful change …….. These problems are not unique to that part of the world – The world is at war, religion lighting the fire and creating a cover for widespread corruption…….. Will we ever learn? – sheep to the slaughter?

    Reply
  • Come on journal sort out your comments policy , no consistency as usual , it seems you only tolerate a certain group of people to be referred as ignorant savages .

    Reply

Add New Comment