TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 18 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Taliban are in ‘daily’ talks with the US, says president

Afgahnistan president Hamid Karzai criticised the Taliban for holding the talks at the same time as they carry out suicide attacks that kill civilians and children.

Afghan president Hamid Karzai speaks during a nationally televised speech today
Afghan president Hamid Karzai speaks during a nationally televised speech today
Image: AP Photo/Ahmad Jamshid

AFGHAN PRESIDENT HAMID Karzai has today criticised the Taliban for holding daily talks with the United States as they also launch suicide attacks that kill civilians and children.

The Islamist militants deny re-opening talks after they broke off tentative contact with the US in Qatar in March last year due to failed attempts to negotiate a prisoner exchange.

Reacting after two suicide bombs killed 19 people in Kabul and Khost on Saturday, Karzai accused the Taliban of negotiating with their enemy at the same time as murdering innocent Afghans.

“The Taliban said they wanted to show their strength (by launching the attacks),” he said. “This is while the leaders of the Taliban, their representatives, are every day at meetings with the Americans abroad.

“We know about it, both the foreigners tell us about it and the Taliban. In Europe as well as in Gulf countries, the Taliban and the Americans and foreigners are in talks on a daily basis.”

Karzai, who offered no proof of the talks and who has a record of making inflammatory speeches, said the attacks enabled the US-led military force to justify its presence in Afghanistan.

“The bombs that were detonated in Kabul and Khost were not a show of force, they were serving America,” he said in a televised speech in Kabul.

A US spokesman travelling with Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who is visiting Kabul, reacted to the speech by saying that the US and Afghanistan governments “shared a common view of the Taliban, and that is that they’re the enemy.”

“If a political reconciliation process leads to different behaviour on their part, it will be an Afghan-led process,” the spokesman added.

The Taliban have consistently refused to negotiate directly with Karzai’s government, which they have been battling since they were ousted from power in a 2001 US-led invasion.

- © AFP, 2013

Read: Unsolved murder highlights plight of Afghan women >

Read: Bin Laden son-in-law captured, faces terror charge in New York >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • The Taliban are barbaric savages. There is no place for them in any civilised society.The deluded insanity of their world view is a living hell for women and total suppression of any human feelings. I’m really not sure what one could talk about with these people.

    Reply
    • What’s the alternative? The West folds up it’s tents and goes home leaving everything to go back to the way it was 10 years ago? They may be a bunch of religious lunatics hell bent on oppression but at least if talking to them can get some relief for the people of Afghanistan when the West pulls out isn’t it worth talking to them?

      Compare the total cost in money and lives for 10 years of war and how much it costs to sit around a table and see which one of them is the better option.

      Reply
    • I understand the need to communicate and compromise, they do not, they are convinced anything outside their twisted world view is evil and God has commanded them to destroy it., which includes people like you and me, think about that Brian.

      Reply
    • Michael 10/03/13 #

      The only thing we should do is leave them alone. No amount of intervention will change this

      Reply
    • Lets get one thing straight, the west ain’t there because the Taliban are barbaric, they’re there to fleece the country dry. Opium from Afghanistan accounted for 9% of world production in 2000, its now at 93% and the trillions of dollars of minerals plus its oil pipeline central for Asia. Radical Islam is directley releated to these countries getting f**ked over for centuries by various colonial powers.

      Reply
    • I suppose you missed the planes that hit the towers, the Pentagon and Flight 97? And that Al Quaeda had based themselves in Afghanistan and were protected by the Taliban? And what natural resources? Afghanistan doesn’t have any.
      When GW Bush was elected he had no idea where Afghanistan was! He barely knew it existed at all apart from someplace the Russians invaded in the 80′s. So why would he plan a war in a medieval back water like Afghanistan?
      When Al Quaeda attacked American assets previously to 9/11 the Americans basicly ignored them. But no leader of any country could or would stand for a direct attack.
      So your conclusion the America and NATO allies invaded for financial benefit is nothing short of ludicrous.

      Reply
    • USA were in negotiations with the Talliban to lay pipelines through Afganistan, in order to avoid Iran, untill talks broke down shortly before the invasion.
      Michel Chossudovsky, October 6, 2012
      * * *
      The 2001 bombing and invasion of Afghanistan has been presented to World public opinion as a “Just War”, a war directed against the Taliban and Al Qaeda, a war to eliminate “Islamic terrorism” and instate Western style democracy.
      The economic dimensions of the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT) are rarely mentioned. The post 9/11 “counter-terrorism campaign” has served to obfuscate the real objectives of the US-NATO war.
      The war on Afghanistan is part of a profit driven agenda: a war of economic conquest and plunder, ”a resource war”.
      While Afghanistan is acknowledged as a strategic hub in Central Asia, bordering on the former Soviet Union, China and Iran, at the crossroads of pipeline routes and major oil and gas reserves, its huge mineral wealth as well as its untapped natural gas reserves have remained, until June 2010, totally unknown to the American public.
      According to a joint report by the Pentagon, the US Geological Survey (USGS) and USAID, Afghanistan is now said to possess “previously unknown” and untapped mineral reserves, estimated authoritatively to be of the order of one trillion dollars (New York Times, U.S. Identifies Vast Mineral Riches in Afghanistan – NYTimes.com, June 14, 2010, See also BBC, 14 June 2010).
      “The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.

      Reply
    • Note
      1. The Golden Crescent trade in opiates constitutes, at present, the centerpiece of Afghanistan’s export economy. The heroin trade, instated at the outset of the Soviet-Afghan war in 1979 and protected by the CIA, generates cash earnings in Western markets in excess of $200 billion dollars a year. Since the 2001 invasion, narcotics production in Afghanistan has increased more than 35 times. In 2009, opium production stood at 6900 tons, compared to less than 200 tons in 2001. In this regard, the multibillion dollar earnings resulting from the Afghan opium production largely occur outside Afghanistan. According to United Nations data, the revenues of the drug trade accruing to the local economy are of the order of 2-3 billion annually. In contrast with the Worldwide sales of heroin resulting from the trade in Afghan opiates, in excess of $200 billion. (See Michel Chossudovsky, America’s War on Terrorism”, Global Research, Montreal, 2005)
      Note : These drugs are killing our children, for American profit

      Reply
  • dave184 10/03/13 #

    To move things on they have to be talked to ….look at england and here …. look at germany and what happened with jews etc ….. the taliban have blood on their hands but they need to be dealt with to get peace …. we might not like who we have to deal with but it needs to be done sometimes for the greater good ….

    Reply
  • It’s good to talk – at the end of the day conflict is only ever resolved by talking and reaching a common consensus.

    Reply
  • Maybee they are sussing them out following them home after the meeting’s ,do you never watch csi or that

    Reply
  • Gnik 10/03/13 #

    I thought the US didn’t negotiate with terrorists?

    Reply
  • Karzai is a joke. He is up to his neck on the drug trade. Those of you know me on here know I am a staunch supporter of the western powers but the Americans really f@#%ed picking him. A few years ago the then Chief of Police was making great progress against both the Taliban and the Drug Lords but Karazi had him sacked because he was interfering with “business”. Now he should have been the one they should have backed.

    Reply
  • B Lowe 10/03/13 #

    Good to see the US exit plan in operation.
    The US has realised they cannot defeat the Taliban and have no option but to talk with the very same guys who have killed countless of their soldiers.
    They tried to train the Afghans but that is never going to work out and now the US negotiates with ‘terrorists’. Where is George Bush and his either your with us or against imperial dictum.

    Reply
    • B Lowe, George bush is living in Texas after stepping down as president after serving two terms. Barack Obama is now president after being elected. Have you not heard? It’s how a democracy works. Something that you are against as you support dictatorships throughout the world.

      Reply
    • B Lowe, and today you are showing support to the Taliban by your own words.

      Reply
    • B Lowe 10/03/13 #

      Re Declan.
      A person who offers support to the Taliban would have to be a hard line Islamists who believes Sharia law should constitute all aspects of societal life.
      I reject such an approach to life. I believe in inclusion for all. I might not agree with your viewpoint but this is a healthy thing. I would die for the right to protect freedom of Speech.
      There was an inclusive government in Afghanistan which promoted women’s rights, inclusion into society and equality a few decades back in Afghanistan
      But guess what Declan? The US supported efforts to overthrow this government which resulted in the Taliban coming to power.

      Reply
    • B Lowe, are you serious?! Did you forget about the soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1980? When did the US invade Afghanistan prior to 2001 and topple a government there?

      Reply
    • And b Lowe, it’s a joke to hear you say that you would die to protect freedom of speech when you support Chavez who took control of radio and tv stations in Venezuela to broadcast his own message. He silenced the opposition.
      People like you are silent in the face of dictatorships around the world.

      Reply
  • A conspiracy to keep a foreign military there? But he’s a known conspirator himself, with electoral fraud getting him into power.

    The Taliban dont need to be secretly ordered by the US to go on their savage suicide bombings.

    Reply

Add New Comment