Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

RollingNews.ie
Politics

Tánaiste denies doing a U-turn on abortion

Coveney also suggested that the abortion referendum could be held a week earlier than expected.

TÁNAISTE SIMON COVENEY has denied doing a U-turn on the abortion referendum.

Coveney changed his stance on the government’s legislative proposals for abortion on Monday.

Writing in the Irish Independent, Coveney said he now supports access to terminations up to 12 weeks after speaking with Health Minister Simon Harris and “senior clinicians”.

Coveney has been criticised by anti-abortion campaigners who are accusing his of flip-flopping on the issue.

However, speaking on The Pat Kenny Show on Newstalk this morning, Coveney said:

“People who are campaigning for a No vote in this election are going to try to gain any advantage they can.

I don’t categorise it as a U-turn at all. I couldn’t support the 12-week proposal unless it was accompanied with what we have got yesterday now from the Minister of Heath – which is a very strict and detailed protocol which involves a lot more time for consideration.

Coveney said his concerns are reflected across the country and that he was stopped many times over people’s concerns about the 12-week proposal.

He added that the proposed law now means that if the Eighth is repealed “late-term abortions now will not happen in Ireland”.

Two-thirds proposal 

On Monday night, Coveney called for the inclusion of a two-thirds majority lock that would be enacted if the Eighth Amendment is repealed.

Yesterday Taoiseach Leo Varadkar described the proposal as “unconstitutional”.

It’s understood that the Tánaiste did not brief the Taoiseach about his proposal before floating the idea.

Speaking about the criticism of the unconstitutionally of his two-thirds Dáil majority proposal, Coveney said:

I was never proposing, and I am not proposing today, that we would tie the hands of any future government.

“Sometimes things covered in the media are made to be much more simple than is the case.”

However, on Monday night a spokesperson for the Tánaiste said he was “looking for a two-thirds majority to be necessary if there was ever any attempt to alter the law in the future.

“To put that into context, that is more than the combined strength of Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil in the current Dáil.

“The Tánaiste hopes this will go some way towards countering the reckless claims that our parliament can’t be trusted and to reassure voters that there will be no creeping change over time if they vote repeal.”

Coveney seemed to draw a line under the idea this morning, saying: “The two-thirds proposal would have required a constitutional change and we’re not going to have another referendum, no we’re not.”

Date

Coveney also suggested that the abortion referendum could be held a week earlier than the expected date of 25 May.

“Once the legislation passes through the Seanad, we’ll be able to announce a date at that stage.

There are two possible dates that we’re looking at towards the end of May … not necessarily the last Friday, it could be the second last Friday.

Yesterday Cabinet approved the draft laws they would try to bring in if the Eighth Amendment is repealed.

Read: Varadkar says Coveney’s call for two-thirds majority lock in abortion law is unconstitutional>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
96
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel