TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Target Express workers to meet liquidators

Meanwhile, the liquidators said that the firm is “hopelessly insolvent”.

Sub-contractors block the entrance to the Target Express haulage company in west Dublin
Sub-contractors block the entrance to the Target Express haulage company in west Dublin
Image: Niall Carson/PA Wire/Press Association Images

STAFF FROM TARGET Express are set to meet the company’s provisional liquidators this morning.

Joint liquidators Steve Tennant and Michael McAteer of Grant Thornton have been appointed to the Target Express holding company College Freight Republic of Ireland.

This morning, Michael McAteer told Newstalk Breakfast that staff will get their entitlements that are protected the State, but it will take four – six months for them to be paid.

He said the company is “hopelessly insolvent” and there are “no funds available to pay any of the wages”.

A petition presented to the High Court yesterday indicated that the company had a total liability of €600,447.

This includes a historical liability and taxes for July and August and the majority of the taxes are PAYE and PRSI.

After the staff are dealt with, the liquidators will deal with the security assets, and see if anyone can step in to save part of the business.

Liquidators

Last night, the provisional liquidators released a statement saying:

As part of this process the provisional liquidators will engage with staff of Target Express to ensure their terms and conditions of employment with regard to minimum notice period, documentation and redundancy are dealt with in line with statutory guidelines. The provisional liquidators are making arrangements to meet staff around the country as a matter of urgency tomorrow.

Employees at the Little Island branch of Target Express are continuing a sit-in. Sit-ins have also been taking place at depots in Cork and Galway.

Speaking to Newstalk Breakfast, employee Tom Cullen said that they are due to meet the liquidators at 10am. Cullen said he hoped the meeting was “a postitive step”. He said:

This was a good company that we all worked for. We thought this was a viable company but it’s now down to this, what we’re doing today; what discussions we have today.

Target Express chief executive Seamus McBrien has previously criticised the Revenue Commissioners for the way it handled the company’s case.

Revenue denies that its involvement has led to the loss of almost 400 jobs, but McBrien says that his company were ready to pay €80,000 of its debt by Friday of last week. The day before, an attachment order was placed on the company’s bank accounts.

Yesterday, Labour TD Ciaran Lynch urged Target Express to engage with workers. He said:

“I visited the workers in the Target Express plant in Little Island today but they have been left completely in the dark about the current status of the company. Target express need to meet their workers immediately and explain fully to them the circumstances that led to revenue making the decision that they have and what position the company is currently in.

Cork-based employees have said they will occupy the premises until their pay and redundancy settlements are discharged by the company.

They will also not allow transportation of merchandise until this occurs and their demands are met.

Read: Provisional liquidator appointed to Target Express>

Read: Target Express workers say they will not leave premises until they get paid>

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • Mjhint 30/08/12 #

    The staff will be paid. What about the suppliers. They are never considered & they have staff to pay also.

    Reply
  • good luck to the staff,hope you get what’s owed

    Reply
  • Reg 30/08/12 #

    “Hopelessly Insolvent” Come out of hiding great outranged and explain that one!

    Reply
  • pay the workers

    Reply
  • 800 million being sent abroad, while people suffer. I am all for charity and helping people, but it begins at home first!

    Reply
    • I get where you are coming from Stephen but I don’t think we can equate the current economic hardships in Ireland with that of the likes of famine in Somalia, etc. There are still are lot of countries out there worse off than Ireland. Unless I am misunderstanding what you meant.

      Reply
  • The majority of the taxes are PAYE and PRSI! Imagine if the Governments plan to have the property tax be taken out of PAYE were in existance now. These workers could lose their homes as well as their jobs.

    Reply
    • Reg 30/08/12 #

      Think your exagerating slightly there Culm.

      Reply
    • How so? I guarantee the Government will still want its property tax! You can’t really believe they will forget about it?

      Reply
    • Reg 30/08/12 #

      What judge is going to take a house from someone who had paid their property tax through their employer in good faith but the employer pocketed it?

      Reply
    • So Reg the individual will have to go to court to fight to keep their home from repossession by the Governemnt, because their employeer (a thrid party to the case), did not pay the tax to the Government in the first place! That’s a great society we are building.

      Reply
    • Gagsy 99 30/08/12 #

      Culm, you’re starting from a highly unlikely premise there. If what you suggest were to be the case then we would already have seen Revenue going after all employees whose tax deductions weren’t paid over by their employer (eg, Target). We know this is clearly not the case – once its deducted by the employer, the employee’s liabilitiy is discharged.

      Reply
    • Reg 30/08/12 #

      Don’t be redicolous Culm, I didn’t say that. But in the unlikely event that it ended up in court and it could be proved that the person had paid his taxed then there would be no case. Anyway there’s no mention of someone loosing their house due to unpaid property taxes. A charge will remain outstanding until the property is sold or attacment orders maybe introduced. Stop scaremongering, the great outraged will get all worried!

      Reply
    • So what is there to stop some chancer setting up a company “deducting” the PAYE & PRSI, but not passing it on to Revenue & then closing the company, when it is discovered & starting all over again?

      Reply
    • Gagsy 99 30/08/12 #

      The same thing that stopping them now – laws.

      Reply
    • Gagsy

      By the time the courts catch up with them they will have left the jurisdiction, you only have to travel 1 hr up the M1 to do that!

      Reply
    • Gagsy 99 30/08/12 #

      I’m confused.
      Is this a phenomenon that you think is already widespread now?

      How does this scheme work?
      Lets say I want to avoid paying tax (PAYE, PRSI or the future property charge). So I set up a company.
      What do I do then? Pay myself some money out of the company – presumably I have to put some of my own money into the company to do this or where is the money coming from? Then I ‘deduct’ the taxes but don’t pay them to the Revenue, instead absconding up the road to Norn Iron. Seems like I end up with the same cash as I had before I started minus my petrol costs to Newry. I’m not saying I’m definitely going to Newry – I’d be mad to be telling everyone where I’m really going on the lam.
      I would enjoy the sense of adventure mind you.

      Reply
    • Reg 30/08/12 #

      That had me laughing Gagsy!

      Reply
    • Years ago in the Ir£ days a VAT dodging scheme was set up. By the time anybody coped on what was going on the company folded & the owners were living in Spain with over 1 million in the bank. What I’m saying it can happen and it will happen if the idiots in Leinster house push through the property tax as part of PAYE. Even if it is not set up as a scam and the company does fail owing Revenue the PAYE, the Government will be without the property tax, causing a shortfall, resulting in higher rates being applied to the rest.
      Also imagine the canteen fights were one worker own a house so pays the property tax so has a smaller take home pay than his buddy in a council house who does not pay the property tax.

      Reply
    • Gagsy 99 30/08/12 #

      Maybe you’re right Culm – they should stick with the current system of getting people to self-register and pay……

      Reply

Add New Comment