TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 18 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

FG youth wing says teachers should be forced to correct State exams

Delegates to Young Fine Gael’s summer school pass a motion saying teachers’ summers should be spent correcting papers.

Image: Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland

THE YOUTH WING of Fine Gael has called on the government to make it compulsory for secondary school teachers to correct papers in the Leaving Cert and Junior Cert exams in a bid to cut down on State spending.

Young Fine Gael members passed a motion calling for compulsory marking at an inaugural summer school named after the party’s late former leader, Garret FitzGerald.

The motion stipulated that correcting papers should be “part of their contract with no additional remuneration”.

It was argued that over half of the annual €30 million budget for holding the State exams was spent on correcting, with teachers earning some €16 million by offering to correct exams under the current opt-in system.

This morning a trade union representing second-level teachers said it saw no reason to tinker with the current system.

“Our current examination system is a rigorous and transparent one. It is vital that that this standard is maintained going forward,” said TUI deputy general secretary Annette Dolan.

“As it stands, the correction of examinations is optional for teachers and this is vitally important in ensuring that the integrity of the system is maintained.”

Dolan said while a public discourse on funding within the education sector was “healthy”, it was important to point out that hundreds of teaching jobs had been lost as a result of cuts to public spending, while remaining teachers had seen pay cut by up to 20 per cent.

The conference also endorsed a motion calling on the introduction of a graduate tax system “as a means to fund Ireland’s ailing third level sector” as long as interim measures were put in place helping students to continue in full-time education if possible.

Other motions endorsed included calls for legalised medicinal marijuana, legislation to give legal recognition to pre-nuptial agreements, plans to avoid holding elections or referenda in the middle of a working week, and that murder convicts should serve a minimum of 25 years of their mandatory life sentences.

A motion which supported FG cabinet minister Phil Hogan’s proposed reforms of local government, and calling on health, transport and education functions to be transferred to local government, did not pass.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (47 Comments)

  • Surprised at the lack of respect for teachers from some people here. It would be fairly damming statement on any teacher who didn’t put the effort into marking papers because they weren’t being paid.

    The country is broke, we need to save money and this is a good way to help us do that. The point on spreading the load is also a good point and should lead to a higher standard of marking. Of course teachers shouldn’t be paid more for supervising exams either and that should be done on a rota basis.

    Reply
  • I agree in theory with the idea on teachers doing the correcting as the amount of holidays teachers receive is huge. However, it is very important that the exams are marked correctly. If you have teachers who don’t want to correct them doing the work with no added incentive some teachers might not be as thorough as they should be. I think something that is more important is to make teachers more accountable. I think everybody has experienced teachers that have been brilliant but also teachers who are quite the opposite. Teachers who are not up to the job of teaching should not be permitted to continue getting paid by the state to “teach”.

    Reply
    • Well said! As an unemployed teacher it drives me mad knowing there are some teachers not doing their job and taking up the space of ones who want to be there. If the job of marking exam papers becomes mandatory for teachers, we are going to face several rounds of getting papers re-checked etc, and more problems will follow that.

      Reply
    • Reg 30/07/12 #

      I’m not sure that teachers won’t do a good job if they had to mark papers as part of their contract. Most teachers do a very good job teaching and there is no reason to suggest that they wouldn’t also good job if they had to mark papers as part of their teaching contract.

      Reply
    • Define more accountable. Secondary teachers are subject to whole school inspection, subject inspection and incidental inspection. It is a different system to ten years ago. Students and parents will no longer put up with inefficient teachers. They will exert pressure on school authorities to deal with under performing teachers.(and so they should) I understand that there are still a minority of poor teachers still being paid to teach but I assure you that in my experience the majority of teachers put enormous effort into their work and are very passionate about their subjects.

      Reply
  • I don’t understand why those who complain about secondary school teachers so much don’t just become secondary school teachers themselves, particularly seeing as our jobs are so cushy, we are so lazy, we have no special skills (it almost seems we just walked in off the street sometimes), and we get paid so much. Really wouldn’t it be easier to just become one of us?

    Reply
  • Last time I heard from those fools they were debating whether or not to make Maggie T an honorary life member. In their own FB page they note that they are really looking forward to the post debate drinks! Seriously I hope you idiots enjoy your little summer camp that no doubt your politician daddies paid for. The problem with this country is that teachers who should be teaching end up trying to run our country.

    Reply
    • What’s wrong with having a drink?
      Most kids their age aren’t remotely politically aware and may never be.
      And the vast majority of YFGers come from non political backgrounds.

      Reply
    • Well said Donnagh. The majority of YFGers arent from Political families at all. You clearly do not know what you’re talking about.
      And quite frankly, criticising young people for getting involved in politics and wanting to make a difference is quite sad.

      Reply
    • Two great points from Donnagh and Lucy…. I come from a family that are not involved at all in politics so my supposed “political daddy” doesn’t exist. I used my hard earned money from my summer job to pay for the weekend… Your point about us drinking is complete nonsense. If you’re going to attack us over drinking then why don’t we start complaining about other clubs and groups in our country who also go out drinking. I think for anyone to call young people who get involved in politics idiots is a complete idiot themselves. Maybe if more young people were to get involved in politics then in the future we may have a better quality of politicians and not “teaching end up trying to run our country” as you say yourself.

      Reply
    • YFG doing what they do best… 
      Look really stupid! No issue with young people involving themselves and taking an interest in politics in fact I applaud it. My issue is when they make total fools of themselves and then parade their total ridiculousness online.

      See link below..

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyTfG_jf194&feature=youtube_gdata_player

      Reply
  • As a teacher if ALL teachers were required to then it would cut down on the amount of marking that would be done for each teacher. I heard that 1 in 8 teachers do the marking. I could be wrong on that and it takes about 3 weeks. If teachers did the marking then it would probably be a 4 day – 1 week which isn’t all that bad.

    Reply
    • I’ve heard a few who have taken it on before saying it’s good money but horrible work and they wouldn’t really do it again.

      You’re absolutely right though, it would spread the load and the load would be a lot lot less than currently. Do you think Conor there would be a problem with consistency?

      Reply
    • This year in Maths and Irish its taken 7weeks – actually we really should be talking about the exam commissioners and their complete inability to set out a proper marking scheme- ask a corrector about the unfairness of their “curve”!! It’s a shambles

      Reply
  • Reg 30/07/12 #

    Not only that but it should be part of their contract that they have to supervise exams also. They can do a roster, say once year every two or three years. The payments for exam supervision and exam corrections are very generous for a country that is bankrupt.

    Reply
    • Tom 31/07/12 #

      You are talking absolute rubbish. What about the people who are reliant on the money they receive from the supervisions? Why does it always fall at the feet of teachers? Is it not enough that their pay has decreased by 15%, or the fact that anyone going into the profession will not have a permanent contract and to top it all off, all the short comings of their parents blamed on the “bloody teachers”. I am not a teacher but I am sick of hearing the constant negativity surrounding them. You are just jealous that u chose a profession that doesn’t have the holidays and hours of a school teacher

      Reply
  • I’d prefer to see teachers having to sit the exam of the subjects that they are teaching as part of their CPD. They sould have to achieve an A grade or else they don’t qualify for their increment. Maybe once every three years so that there is still a panel to invigilate and do corrections. The good teachers would have nothing to fear from this. It’s not unheard of for ‘instructors’ to sit the same exams as their students in order to maintain their instructor rating.

    The defence and denial of a minority of terrible teachers by the teaching unions is a disgrace and that’s why the mob will jump on the bandwagon about this issue.

    The majority teachers are very good and considering some of the crap that they have to endure, they should have the option of taking the summer off.

    Reply
  • Why don’t YFG mark the papers themselves?
    Seem to be doing fk all else but talking shyte tbh.

    Reply
  • i have no problem with that however Youth Fine Gael say in the report that correcting state exams should be “part of their contract with no additional remuneration”, but the fact is that it isn’t part of their contracts and it wasn’t part of the Croke Park agreement so I doubt it will ever happen, particularly given the Junior Cert changes. If Youth Fine Gael wanted to do anything other than grab headlines they should have put a motion forward that teachers should have to “supervise” state exams that would also save money and would make more sense as logistically it would be much easier to manage as teachers would be merely required to stay at their current post locations for an additional three weeks. That won’t happen either but good luck to Young Fine Gael for managing to grab a few headlines; next week they might put some motions to other public services workers like the defence forces, Gardai, health services staff. And what about primary teachers & members of Dail Eireann, they have long holidays too, perhaps they could join forces with secondary school teachers in July & August and clean the streets or provide some other form of public service…..

    Reply
    • Yeh, absolutely, public sector workers who live the life with their super long holidays should sweep streets :) How about we all go on strike and demand that public and private sector workers get long holidays and we all hang out and spend our lives having a bit of fun instead of working for 52 weeks a year for 50 years and then dying at the end of it all?

      Reply
  • Teachers not bankers, sure it’s all the teachers fault….yadda, yadda, yadda….

    Reply
    • this makes no sense

      Reply
    • YFG make no sense, just a bunch of lads discussing sport. The Garret Fitzgerald Summer School for boys who want to wear the shiniest suit.

      Reply
    • Reg 30/07/12 #

      Martin – you do realise that Bertie doubled spending, much of it on pay and conditions over a period of ten years. The money he used to double that spending came from sources that were not sustainable. The national income does not now support that level of spending so painful adjustments have to be made, not just for teachers.

      Reply
    • When will the adjustment be made for the rich Reg?

      Reply
    • Reg 30/07/12 #

      Well Martin first of all the rich aren’t paid from the public purse. However, there is an argument that the rich should be paying more tax.

      Reply
    • Oh are they not? What about the high up civil servants, politicians, pencil pushers in the HSE, etc,.? Why are we looking to aim cuts at teachers who earn relatively meagre wages when those people seem to escape any cuts? And taxing the rich is not something any sane person should be arguing against, the effective tax rates for the super rich here are shockingly low.

      Reply
    • Reg 30/07/12 #

      Martin, I agree with you on the higher end salaries in politics and other areas of the public sector. I don’t have a definition of rich to hand but I’m sure some of them would qualify. The government has not done enough to tackle these high salaries and grotesque pensions.

      However tackling the high rollers won’t deliver all the savings required, things like generous additional payments for things like exam supervision have to be looked at. This goes right across the public sector, I believe the Gardai have allowances for all sorts.

      Reply
  • It seems fair to me that a teacher currently getting paid EUR40k to work 167 days a year should get paid EUR56k to work 235 days a year (a similar number to most other people).

    Those extra 68 days work could certainly include correcting exams.

    Reply
    • What about on top of the 167 days, the 33 Croke park hours plus, not every teacher, but the average extra hours I put in outside of my actual school days last year amounted to over 300 hours at least between evening debates, school tours, field trips, coaching etc. I was one of many on the staff I worked with who broke their backsides to give the students the most positive educational experience we could provide them with. I consider the holidays R&R and time to enthuse myself to go back every September and give it my all.

      Reply
  • “Young Fine Gael”! A laughable concept in itself.

    Reply
  • Do teachers just have to work 167 days a year on full pay, or is that just an urban myth?
    Is it a 9 hour day?

    Reply
  • The new Fine Gael philosophy? Forced labour without pay?

    Are we to have Fine Gael and Labour Gulags?

    Extend this to the Fine Gael support-base, the farmers, and you will see how far you get!

    Typical streak of historical blueshirt, dictatorial anti-worker bias.

    Pity it has been inbred into the baby-blueshirts too!

    It is time that people realised that this idea is not solely for teachers – it is for all workers.

    It has been commenced with the Jobsbridge interns – slave-labour for the employers which is used to do away with full-time permanent positions.

    Éamon Gilmore is in danger of presiding over the final demise of the Labour Party- he has supped with the devil for too long, and has gotten too used to the ‘long spoon’ required!

    Reply
  • There is a lot more obvious areas of the system that YFG could be addressing rather than trying to throw out something that they know that the public will agree with overall.

    Their suggestion appears poorly thought out though there is a point in there somewhere.

    First, I’ve just finished 4 years in UL to become a teacher. It’s my opinion that teachers don’t get paid enough, have too much holidays and don’t take on certain things they should take on. I know a lot of people will concentrate on the first line there. To set some context: I’ve worked in private industry and I’ve been on placement in schools too. The idea that teaching is a cushy job is absolutely ludicrous and is thrown out by those who either simply don’t know or have experience of the kind of teacher who deserves to be fired.

    The system I’d like to be a part of would have teachers correcting examination material for their own pupils. There would be a longer school year – about a month longer. The state examinations would be determined by awarding 50% of each “semester” for every subject in project work. The other 50% can be down to written/practical taken each semester.
    Teachers can be assigned to visit other local schools on non-teaching days (over christmas/ new year and early summer) to review as an external examiner currently would for Construction studies projects.
    Even paying teachers a mileage allowance and for these additional days would be offset from correction costs currently.

    The effects of this could potentially completely change the educational experience for pupils also. Manageable chunks of syllabus is covered in reasonable amounts of time for both teacher and pupil. It could highlight areas where syllabi are overloaded. It would allow teachers to step up to the plate and show that they can be professional – and highlight the unprofessional for some action to be taken against them (finally??!). It would mean that the exams which every school does every year could have more significant standing and to some extent allow pupils to recognise the 3rd level way of doing things.

    It would also have the potential to generate some faith in the points system (Lots of people call the points system a problem – I personally don’t think it is, the problem IMO lies more in the mode of examination and the educational experience that encourages)

    Most importantly, it would mean more value out of teachers, and IMO contribute to a view of a more valuable teacher.

    Reply
  • Ahh the Hitler Youth. Persuasive as ever

    Reply
  • Teachers up in Northern Ireland have a statutory salary range from EUR23,685 to EUR40,327.

    South of the border it’s a much warmer EUR33,041 to EUR59,327.

    Perhaps teachers from Northern Ireland could come down during the summer months and correct the exams to help top up their salaries, while our teachers are recuperating.

    Reply
  • Rob 30/07/12 #

    We need to adopt a new constitution which enables us to retrospectively claw-back the pensions of retiree ministers and change the contracts of teachers. Under the present constitution, we are in a straightjacket.

    Reply
  • Rob 30/07/12 #

    Most other European countries require teachers to correct exam papers. In Ireland, teachers get 3 months holidays. Personally, I don’t think FG will change anything because they recently proved they need a bigger pot to tap in order to keep the party running. We need to reform the public sector by electing either Sinn Fein or the Socialists. Sinn Fein have recently pledged these reforms if they win the next election.

    Reply

Add New Comment