TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

The 9 at 9: Thursday

The nine stories you need to know this morning, including: students expelled from Dublin school over Facebook messages, one third of voters don’t know how they’re voting – and Copper Face Jacks…

Image: Ross Whitaker

EVERY MORNING, TheJournal.ie brings you the nine stories you need to know as you kick off your day.

1. #REFERENDUM: Around one third of voters still don’t know how they will vote in the upcoming referendum according to a new poll. 37 per cent of voters intend to vote Yes, 24 per cent will vote No, and 4 per cent say they will not vote, according to the Millward Brown Lansdowne poll in the Irish Independent. Fine Gael voters have the largest proportion of Yes voters, while 82 per cent of Sinn Féin voters intend to vote No.

2. #GREECE: The cost of Greece exiting the euro could be $1 trillion, according to the dramatic front page of The Guardian today. The estimate comes amid mounting speculation about the country’s future in the eurozone. The Wall Street Journal reported that some €700 million has been withdrawn from Greek banks so far this week, raising further concerns for European leaders.

3. #FACEBOOK:  Four students have been expelled from a Dublin school after posting abusive messages about teachers in the school on Facebook. The Irish Times reports that the fifth-year students at Oatlands College in Mount Merrion posted sexual allegations about a male and female teacher in the school and made negative remarks about another female teacher. Forty other students were given detention for liking the posts.

4. #TALLAGHT HOSPITAL: The health watchdog is set to publish a report into safety at Tallaght Hospital in Dublin later today following an investigation last year into concerns about patients at the hospital’s Emergency Department. The inquiry followed concerns raised by the Dublin city coroner who said the hospital “sounds like a very dangerous place” at the inquest into the death of a 65-year-old man at the hospital last March.

5. #LEGAL FEES: The legal fees of the solicitor working for Fr Kevin Reynolds have been cut by almost €200,000 following an unprecedented ruling by the High Court Taxing Master. Declan O’Neill said that economic downturn and the decrease in professional fees were behind his decision to cut the fees of the lawyer by almost 70 per cent in the case taken by the priest against RTE over the Mission to Prey programme.

6. #AMPUTATION: The High Court has granted permission to a hospital to amputate the leg of an unconscious man in order to save his life after his relatives refused to give consent for the operation. The Irish Independent reports that the 59-year-old has gangrene, and doctors had warned that unless they operated immediately he could develop life-threatening complications.

7. #WELCOME HOME: Hundreds of Irish troops deployed to Lebanon will return home today after completing a six-month tour of duty. Around 240 members of the 105th Battalion will arrive in Dublin Airport this afternoon, one week after the 200 other members of the battalion returned to Ireland. Almost 12,000 international troops are involved in the UNIFIL mission in Lebannon.

8. #KENNEDYS: The estranged wife of Robert F Kennedy Jr, the son of RFK and nephew of John F Kennedy, has been found dead at her home in New York. The New York Times reports that the 52-year-old is believed to have killed herself. The couple are believed to have separated in 2010 but were not divorced.

9. #COPPER FACE JACKS: It’s the nightclub of choice for gardaí, nurses and the Dublin football team – and now, apparently, the US Secret Service. Dublin nightclub Copper Face Jacks is at the centre of an unlikely sex scandal after a married US Secret Service agent is alleged to have started an affair with a woman in the nightclub when he was in Dublin as part of Barack Obama’s visit to Ireland last year, according to The Sun. The agent is now being investigated over claims Secret Service agents used prostitutes in Columbia.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • What is annoying about that Facebook School story is that the parents are appealing the decision of the school that the kids insulted. If I did something like that my dad would have agreed with the school and punished me, and I’d have taken it. Parenting has changed a lot.

    Reply
  • It’s bizarre the way nearly everything I read on the internet had me thinking that people were voting No until I saw these polls. Now I think No voters are just louder.

    Reply
  • He wasn’t so secret with that affair was he ?

    Reply
  • i was asked by a person from college when they seen my profile pic ” why should i vote no” this was my answer;

    because if a yes vote goes through we lose control of our monetary polices forever, secondary there is a potential clause in the treaty that may negate our constitution and they will not have to ask our permission in any future civic polices brought foreword by Europe, if this isnt bad enough the fiscal treaty is concerned with keeping austerity as the main way of keeping Europe out of any financial difficulty, this means cuts for us not large banks, corporations, politicians, or any other department that has lobbying power will be free of them as they are the ones driving the monetary system. it should be asked from us all what do you want from life, work for the system or have the system work for you. NO = work for you and YES = work for the system.

    Reply
    • Our monetary policy is already controlled by Europe. I think you’re talking about fiscal policy. The only thing we sign up to is to keep within broad budget parameters. The level of spending and taxation is still up to us.

      There is nothing that changes how laws are accepted from Europe. Why hasn’t the NO side made this point before? Any other law that would be subject to referendum would still be subject to referendum after this treaty is ratified.

      Reply
    • Nick, we didn’t ask you on here did we?

      Reply
    • No, we sign up to a complete loss of sovereignty on fiscal policy, we create a supranational quango which can impose policies and fines and cannot be challenged in court, and because this is NOT an EU treaty neither this quango’s decisions nor any further changes arising from the pact are subject to constitutional referendum in future.

      Furthermore, it removes any possibility of achieving a write-off of debt as a Yes vote would be throwing away all bargaining chips. Ireland will forever sit at the big table naked if we vote Yes.

      Reply
    • Can you name the part of the treaty that removes the obligation to ask us to vote on future civic policies

      The same was said about Nice and Lisbon a d yet we are still voting.

      I have no problem with advocating for either side but your arguments must be backed up with the truth.

      Reply
    • For me, monetary polices is a umbrella term, with currency controlled by the EU this treaty will also take the fiscal policies control and we get to manage what they decide on, hence we lose our monetary policies forever. In you’re statement David, “the only thing we sign up to is to keep within broad budget parameters. The level of spending and taxation is still up to us.” This is impossible, in order to budget the government has to tax. therefore we lose control. Furthermore I did not mention laws I wrote civic policies, however KarlMarks says it best here, “because this is NOT an EU treaty neither this quango’s decisions nor any further changes arising from the pact are subject to constitutional referendum in future.” ultimately the people will make the decision. You have seen my reasons for voting no and you have seen the comments like David’s, so here is my closing statement, more and more treatys are created with bypasses written within them to take away your rights, so don’t take comments like ours into your decision making process, take that the power into your own hands and research for yourselveses, empower yourselves and thank you for reading this.

      Reply
  • Vote NO and help save Oreland.

    Reply
  • Is a US secret service officer’s affair really newsworthy?? Must be a slow news day…

    Reply
  • #Facebook. Isn’t it abut strange that with the impending IPO that wears getting a Facebook story every day

    How did the school find out about the posting I keep my wall private so that only friends can see it.

    Is this just some viral advertising?

    Reply
  • What happened has happened to freedom of speech? It is a ridiculous where people are being arrested for things they say on Twitter and now people are being punished for harmless things they say on Facebook? The internet, arguably one of man’s greatest inventions to date was brilliant because it allowed for the free sharing of information and opinions. It is oblivious to gender, race, religion or politics.

    Why does everything have to be destroyed by closed minded people who want to exert some level of control and censorship upon everything.

    Warning! Warning, someone somewhere is saying or thinking something that someone else may not like! Quick, lets stamp that out before people foolishly start to think that we live in a free thinking modern society!

    Reply
    • I’m certainly not pro-censorship – for me it’s a question of how you use your freedom of speech. Kids have killed themselves because of cyber-bullying, people’s lives have been ruined. We need common sense and good manners – these kids apparently aren’t learning that from their parents so I think it’s fair enough that the school in question takes a stand.

      Reply
    • William you are in fact and i say this vehemently a complete moron.. Hitler had an strong opinion too and look where that nearly got us. If you comment further and completely ignore what ive said there is no hope for this country and shall indeed A. Start choosing my own demise quickly or B. Start with the visa applications for Oz/canada.

      Reply
    • William your confusing opinion with bullying/slander. I’m sure most people don’t have a problem with freedom of expression but it’s a different story when it can affect someone’s personal life. Living in a free thinking society is different to openly making derogatory marks about someone. Depending on what they posted it could affect that teacher’s career if it was something posted about sex with a student. And then the person who posted would probably have bout 200 ‘friends’ who saw the post. As previously said, people have killed themselves over cyber bullying. There’s a difference between censorship and using common sense. Put things in perspective, yeah?

      Reply
  • Not a conspiracy Just Viral advertising.

    * goes off to find my tinfoil hat*

    Reply

Add New Comment