TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

UNITE ‘stands firm’ on ESB industrial action

The union said that its members were clear on their intention that if the State disposed of the company they would undertake industrial action.

TRADE UNION UNITE says it “stands firm” on its plans to ballot.

It says it is firm in representing interests of members, company and state in the ESB debate over the government’s plan to sell off a minority stake in the energy provider as part of a bid to raise capital under the IMF/EU bailout plan.

UNITE is the largest trade union among ESB staff, representing some 7,000 workers.

Its ballots will ask members to vote for industrial action up to, and including, a full withdrawal of labour over the proposed sale.

Last week, Jimmy Kelly, who leads the union in Ireland, said his union’s members had been clear “for a long time” on their intention that any move by the State to dispose of the company would lead to industrial action.

The UNITE trade union says it has an ‘obligation’ to stand up for the rights of its members working at ESB as well as to the future of the company and the best interests of the State.

UNITE Regional Secretary, Jimmy Kelly said:

It has been wrongly suggested that UNITE’s decision to ballot members for industrial action over the sale of the ESB is a knee jerk reaction.
We are implementing a decision taken unanimously by representatives of all workers at the company, and all trade unions in July of this year.

Yesterday, Eamon Devoy, general secretary of the TEEU said strike threats were “handing the agenda to pro-privatisation” elements in Ireland.

He said: “It’s not appropriate to be all the time threatening to pull the electricity supply.”

Kelly said that UNITE members “work shoulder to shoulder with members of other trade unions and will act, as always in a coordinated fashion with other trade unions and their members”.  He said that the suggestion that it is only UNITE members that are “willing to fight for the future of the company” does not stand up.

UNITE has an obligation to do what is best for all staff,the company and the long term energy security of Ireland. We believe that the maintainance of the company as a state asset is vital to those three elements, and are unwilling to accept that the interests of political ideology and the IMF are more important.

UNITE said that as a result of this decision, members would be balloted on industrial action following a motion already passed at the biennial conference of the ESB Group of Unions in July.

Read: Unite to ballot members on industrial action over ESB sell off>

Read: Unite official fully expects ESB workers to vote for industrial action>

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • The long term energy security of Ireland, one of UNITE’s supposed goals, requires that the country not be at the mercy of the ESB Unions.

    I look forward to UNITE fulfilling its obligation and disbanding in order to protect the country’s energy security. Holding my breath. Not. Hypocrites.

    Reply
  • Hard to imagine a less constructive trade union than Unite; almost destroyed BA.

    Reply
  • If they strike fire them, there are thousands waiting in the wings… The days of 70,000 k wages for those workers should be gone.

    Reply
  • Unions say it’s in the interest of the state for this to be stopped. Yeah, because the unions really care about the rest of us!!!

    Reply
  • It is up to the government to ensure that there are no non accidental disruptions of power. UNITE have an obligation to stop threatening never mind acting in a way that will harm the country. It is hard to know if selling part of the ESB is a good idea.

    Reply
  • if UNITE do strike (and lets hope not) then the government / ESB leadership needs to deal with them decisively and quickly it cannot be allowed to drag on and disrupt what needs to be done

    Reply
  • Minority stake for sale. MINORITY! very little input into the company other than reaping profits! If the government do it right they’ll have built in buy back clauses with the sale contract. The best option is to spin-off the network from the supply company, keep the network and infrastructure and sell the older, least valuable plants or those lacking efficiency. They won’t get much for them but it’s unloading assets for cash! License energy generation that if a plant drops below a certain production level or causes a brown out they get fined. So long as we own the network we can name the terms. Who produces the power is irrelevant!

    Reply
  • Kildare 20/09/11 #

    Remember, to sell something there needs to be a buyer. Who in their right mind is going to buy something that the govt will be expecting boom time prices for. Remember valuations are based on predicted revenue and return on investment, not on assets!!

    Reply
  • What a shower of right wingers you all are. The impact of electricity privatisation has been disastrous everywhere it’s been tried – California had numerous blackouts and Auckland was without power for weeks. But never mind all the eejits above would rather cut off their nose to spite the unions’ face. Privatising the ESB is all about paying back private debts run up private banks and there will be no benefit to the country whatsoever in sellling off, probably at a ridiculously low price, invaluable national assets that has the state has spent decades building up into an efficient company that consistently returns a profit to the exchequer.

    I fully support UNITE’s stance and wish more unions had the balls and power of electricity workers to fight back against austerity.

    We can expect a huge media-led propaganda campaign against the ESB workers in the coming months, which has already begun with dishonest attack pieces against Brendan Ogle, one of the few remaining union leaders with some gumption and a basic ability to stand up for workers’ interests.

    Reply
    • Unite isn’t working in the interest of the state. You are deluded if you think they are. I don’t support privatisation myself but don’t fool yourself. Unite are not opposed to privatisation on the bases that there may be blackouts, a drop in service etc. They are purely trying to save the overpaid staff and will use their usual bulling tactics.

      Reply
    • I didn’t realize that the fleetingwhim note was satire until I got to the part about Brendan Ogle being someone with the ability to stand up for workers’ interests.

      Beautifully written!

      Reply
  • I hope the Strike is in support of Ms Teresa TREACY who has been locked for "contempt of court" for nit allowing ESB TO COME IN TO HER LAND IN TULLAMORE OTHEWISE I DO NOT CONDONE YOUR STRIKE

    Reply

Add New Comment