TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

US election: Romney and Republicans ‘raised over $100m last month’

Fundraising battle heats up between Romney and Obama…

US REPUBLICAN PARTY candidate Mitt Romney and the Republican National Committee combined to raise more than $100 million in June, two GOP officials said yesterday.

The amount is a striking number for a challenger who for the second straight month outpaced President Barack Obama and the Democrats.

Given the pace of Obama’s heavy advertising spending and Romney’s focus on husbanding his resources, the imminent Republican nominee’s fundraising put him on pace to reach Obama’s impressive cash reserves this summer, just as most voters begin tuning in for the fall campaign.

Romney, while enjoying a financial bounty with money raised directly for his campaign and the RNC, was also getting help from outside “super” political committees working in his favor. Taken together, the groups’ fundraising strength means Romney could have a permanent financial advantage over Obama, who could be the first president in history to be outspent by his opponent.

The totals showed Romney picking up the pace after working in April and May to bring Republicans together following a bruising battle for the Republican nomination. The campaign in concert with the RNC had set $100 million fundraising goals for June and July, and appeared to have met the first.

Obama and Romney have raised more than $350 million combined toward the election — a pace expected to exceed $1 billion by November. That’s factoring in hundreds of millions in expected contributions to political parties, joint-fundraising efforts, super PACs and nonprofit organisations.

Romney officials have privately said the governor’s national committee was on track to raise $150 million in a period spanning roughly April through June. Those officials told donors there were few states that haven’t broken internal fundraising records, and they expressed confidence the campaign could close its cash-on-hand gap with Obama’s re-election effort.

Meanwhile, a joint-fundraising committee with the GOP, known as the Romney Victory Fund, has hosted more than 100 events so far, including a Boston fundraiser on May 24 that pulled in $7 million. Romney starting raising money with the Republican Party in April.

Record-breaking

Obama himself broke fundraising records four years ago, pulling in $750 million for his last campaign, including a record $150 million in September 2008. To be sure, Obama also has super PACs working in his favor — notably Priorities USA Action, run by a former White House aide — although the groups have yet to catch up to the fundraising benchmarks of their GOP counterparts.

Pro-Romney super PACs like American Crossroads and Restore Our Future have spent tens of millions of dollars on TV ads critical of Obama in key states, and the groups expect to spend more as November approaches.

The Obama campaign has spent nearly $71 million on advertising from April through last week, part of an overall $90 million effort by Democrats on the presidential race, according to ad-spending reports provided to The Associated Press. Romney’s campaign has spent far less, $15.6 million, with super PACs making up the rest of the roughly $68 million for Republicans.

Obama leads narrowly in a number of closely targeted battleground and swing states. But Romney has crept closer to the Democrat in national head-to-head polls since essentially locking up the nomination in April. Neither Obama nor the Democratic National Committee has released what they raised in June. However, it’s expected that they will not report having raised $100 million.

In May, Romney and the RNC raised a combined $76.8 million, while Obama and the DNC brought in $60 million. A full accounting of the campaigns’ finances is due to the Federal Election Commission by July 20.

Romney’s campaign declined to verify the total, which was confirmed by Republican officials who asked not to be named because they were not authorised to release the information. Campaign officials said they planned to release their fundraising totals for June next week. Politico first reported the figure.

Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt said Romney was leaking the figure to distract from other issues.

“Americans are less concerned about how much money he raised to get himself elected and more interested in what he would do after repealing health reform,” LaBolt said. He was referring to Romney’s pledge to repeal the health care law enacted by Obama in 2010, which the Supreme Court upheld last week.

Irish-born reporter who interrupted Obama says focus on him is ‘ridiculous’ >

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • its really mental and a bit sick how much money they can raise just for their campaign. JUST FOR A CAMPAIGN! Its just seems so wrong that they must spend that much. Just shows how much money is out there and how badly it is being utilized. There has got to be better ways to spend $100 million. Boggles the mind.

    Reply
    • The Republicans have said they intend spending at least $1 billion on this election. Likely that Democratic spending won’t be that far behind, so around $2 billion on the election in total.

      I suppose you can call it a stimulus for the advertising and media industries. But really, it’s mad and certainly distorts democracy. The advertising is so nasty and divisive that I really believe it has harmed and divided society too, it’s reached the point that each side sees the other as the devil incarnate and that no matter who wins they are unable to do much as they are blocked incessantly by the other side.

      Roll up, roll up and watch US politics eating itself.

      Reply
    • Divide and conquer, works like a dream everytime and will continue to be the reason we get screwed bigtime. Feel sorry for the Americans, they really have very little hope against the machine they are up against, no free press, both parties differ very little on the main issues but are on complete opposites on trival things compared to the big picture. Its a nation that is too concentrated on spreading its empire than issues at home and like all empires its fall will be devasting to them and

      Reply
    • Stupid thumbs pressing the submit comment before i’m finished, anyway the saying of “when America sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold” comes to mind. It ain’t gonna be pretty.

      Reply
  • And here in Ireland we are worried about sponsoring Golf Tees and donations of €2,500.

    Reply
    • There should be no donations allowed above €50 per citizen per candidate in any election in this country. It gives Mrs. Dunne next door the same influence as Ben Dunne and would be more representative of a true democratic state. Who knows, it might even stop the cronyism that has brought us to the brink.

      Reply
  • Democracy is an expensive commodity!

    Reply
  • TL;DR = this is not a good thing!

    Reply
  • “Romney 2012 – The best candidate money can buy”

    Lets hope citizens united gets consigned to the trash can soon before the corporate takeover of democracy is complete.

    Reply
  • $100 million fund raising in ONE month? When does either candidate or party..want to address this immense amount of money on mere fundraising to get elected…..there are vast amounts of people in this country struggling (I’m not talking about the leaches who on welfare) everyday…..$100 MILLION ?economy issue my arse! I’m an Irish immigrant, with voting rites in the US, this money is obnoxious and should be put to better use.

    Reply
  • This is why I prefer the system used in the UN and Canada. Where the Monarch or the Govenor General is tye head of state.

    Their role is largely only symbolic. They don’t run in elections or meddle in affairs of State. You don’t have them butting heads, as you see frequently with both levels of federal government there (Congress and the Senate).

    The real power to govern lies with tje Prime Minister, who is the leader of the political party with the most seats in Government. Which gives voters, supposedly, more say in the electorate.

    Reply

Add New Comment