TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

US navy is working on a drone ship

Drones will no longer operate only in the skies – this one will be used to track submarines.

Image: DARPA

THE DRONE WAR taking place over the skies of Afghanistan, carrying out remotely-piloted attacks on terrorist targets, will soon take an unexpected turn — underwater.

The new ‘drone ship’ is called the Anti-Submarine Warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vehicle (ACTUV), and once completed, it will be an autonomous, submarine spying platform.

With 43 countries fielding submarines, it’s getting tougher for the Navy to track the estimated 600 of them. That may change with the ACTUV program, led by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Raytheon Corp. working to develop it.

Unlike a flying drone which requires a pilot to monitor and strike targets, the ACTUV doesn’t require an operator.

“This is a brave new world we’re embarking on,” Ed Hoak, programme manager for Raytheon told Business Insider. “How do you take something that has been operator intensive and take that operator out of the loop?”

That operator would be a Navy sonar technician, a sailor usually wearing headphones and monitoring a computer screen. Sonar techs were immortalised in the character of Jonesy in the 1990 film The Hunt for Red October, who called out enemy submarines as they approached.

“We’re taking Jonesy out of the loop and going completely autonomous,” said Hoak.

Trawling along on the ocean surface, the drone ship will receive instructions to go to a certain waypoint and loiter.

At a total program cost of $61 million, the ACTUV will be outfitted with an active and passive sonar system that has search, detection, and passive threat filtering capabilities. The advanced system allows the craft to send active “pings” for potential threats — which would reveal its position, or stay passive and listen while maintaining stealth.

actuv_vhfs

An artist rendering of the ACTUV tracking a sumbarine. DARPA

“When there’s some sort of intelligence or something of interest, it will autonomously move, all by itself, obeying all the rules of the road for the ocean,” Hauk told Business Insider. Basically, the ship will follow norms of ocean tavel and be advanced enough not to crash into other surface ships.

Then, once it picks up the “suspicious contact,” it will monitor and report back. “It will trail and actively track that submarine for up to 3 months,” Hauk said.

The push for an autonomous drone in the ocean is a step toward a leaner Navy, that’s meant to complement the existing fleet.

“If you can put a reasonably low-cost sensing vehicle and put it in harms way for a fraction of the cost [of a typical Navy ship], that’s a good tradeoff,” Hauk told Business Insider. “Thats the type of technology we have going on here.”

The Navy caught a Russian submarine off the eastern seaboard in Oct. 2012, certainly bolstering arguments in favor of anti-submarine technology. Sam Kephart, a drone critic who worked in the high-end security business for 17 years, is not so sure.

There are a number of factors that he believes need to be addressed — such as how a ship can autonomously comply with many different maritime laws, how they steer safely away from other sea traffic, and perhaps most important: how does it distinguish between friend and foe?

“Overall, I think the seaborne-drone program has merit, however, we have an American public that’s not being told the truth about the nature and scope of the military risk relative to global submarine proliferation,” Kephart told Business Insider.

For now at least, the drones will only be used for surveillance with no plans for having them armed, although Hoak believes eventually they could have a variety of other uses, like mine detection. ”We are certainly interested in exploring other payloads on this vehicle,” he said.

The deadline for the sonar system delivery from Raytheon is due in a year and a half, with full program demonstration expected in the “next couple of years,” according to Hauk.

SAIC also put together this demonstration video to show some of its potential capabilities:


via ScienceApplications/Youtube

- Paul Szoldra

Published with permission from:

Business Insider
Business Insider is a business site with strong financial, media and tech focus.

Read next:

Comments (31 Comments)

  • Sarah Connors must be shitting herself

    Reply
  • bacoxy 17/03/13 #

    ‘Unexpected turn’? The only thing unexpected about drones in the seas is that it took them this long to develop them.

    Reply
    • It’s not the first Naval drone, the US test fired missiles from one developed by Rafael of Israel last year. When fully implemented it will offer the Fleets protection against smaller (possibly suicide) attack in the Persian Gulf.

      Reply
  • Dmc 17/03/13 #

    Star Wars: Attack of the drones

    Reply
  • Is this the start of the terminator?

    Reply
  • All wars will be fought by drones in a few years.
    Why bother to risk a soldier when a machine will do?

    Reply
  • What brave new world that has such creatures in it

    Reply
  • I do think that they will need a human sonar operator. A person will be able to distinguish more subtle sounds.

    Reply
  • 61 million how many starving Americans would that have fed. It’s a sick world I have to grow up in and i don’t really like it anymore. Drones that fly in the sky dropping bombs, a guy in a room with a joy stick,there is nothing right about that especially when we know that they are killing many innocent civilians.
    America is trillions in debt and have just inflicted billions of cuts on their citizens, where are they getting the money for all this? I think world war 3 is on the way, we have heard currency wars being discussed and history tells us currency wars lead to trade wars lead to real wars! Can someone explain to me where all the gold is gone, base for our currency where is it?

    Reply
    • Eh, don’t know how to tell you this but Gold isn’t the basis of our currency anymore. That went the way of the dodo in the Nixon era when he said that the Dollar was strong enough and secure enough to not need a backing in gold. Everyone else followed suit and it led to massive global economic improvements.
      In relation to the innocents getting killed, less innocents are killed as a result of warfare now then at any stage since the introduction of machinery in war (c. 125 years) it’s just that with a 24 hours instant news cycle you hear about it easier. Basically things aren’t worse than ever. If anything they’re probably a little bit better but we just hear how bad it is all the time cos good news doesn’t sell.

      Reply
    • its crazy how much the Americans are in debt by, but did you know that countries all around the world owe them money as well. With America still as the number 1 super power (for now) they can basically do as they please

      Reply
    • Don’t know much about the gold but just read a report about gold reserves gone from England banks and others. Still strange as to where it is but maybe you know what is happening has it been sold? Thanks

      So America is in debt and has the whole world in debt with them.

      War is killing less people, oh so that makes it okay that a guy can sit behind a screen and play a game try hit a target and drop a bomb mostly killing innocent civilians. Look at Palestine what justifies that, most of the children in Palestine has lost the will to live I am talking about small children.
      America is invading these counties because what ?these people human rights under their current leadership but they can turn a blind eye to the millions starving in their own country,homelessness is on the increase people in dire straits in America. Sorry lads no money for ye we have to take more money off ye.but we can afford to protect other countries citizens human rights, like they care. What about the 1000 men women and children dying in Iran because of US sanctions on medicine. Yes concerned with human rights they are indeed? America is a terrorist superpower, who continuously talk of global government, they are snapping up the resources and trying to destroy any other superpower that might be a threat to their agenda, Latin Americas, Middle East, Australia( financially starting to dip into recession) banks profit from war not people.

      Reply
    • Less innocents are killed since the introduction of machinery?
      Hiroshima nuclear bombs.
      Idiot.

      Reply
    • There are many ways to skin a cat. War is just a means to an end.

      Reply
    • mattoid 17/03/13 #

      I think you need to reread the original comment Leonard, especially when you’re embarrassing yourself by calling someone else an idiot!

      Reply
    • I’m the idiot? Right. Firstly there was only one bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Secondly it didn’t happen now. It happened 60 years ago. So like I said, less people are being killed NOW then there has been at any time since the introduction of technology in war. You call me an idiot and then try and refute my point with an example that actually backs it up.
      Who’s the idiot?

      Reply
    • Adell how old are you???

      Reply
  • I thought it was huge bees!

    Reply
  • All i see is propaganda

    Reply
  • Offcourse to make peace in the world,isnt?

    Reply
  • Or they will just use these drones to take more of our freedoms away. Merrrrrrr

    Reply
  • Pure laziness!

    Reply
  • When was the last time a non NATO sub Attacked anything?

    Reply
    • Does that really matter at all? China has submarines, North Korea has submarines and Russia has submarines. If nations you perceive as a possible threat have an asset then it makes perfect sense to develop a counter to them.

      Reply
    • mattoid 17/03/13 #

      2010 when a North Korean submarine sank a South Korean naval vessel.

      Reply
    • Submarines aren’t used primarily to attack. They’re used as a threat of attack. (MAD throughout the cold war was primarily based on the retaliatory capabilities of both sides submarine fleet) So asking that question takes the role of this drone out of its context.
      The article specifically mentions the Russian sub that was found in US waters last year. The drone is a cost effective way of observing this subs which in turn will present future flashpoint incursions whilst limiting defence spending. Smaller armies are a good thing I thought. No?

      Reply
    • Took the words right out of my mouth Mattoid.

      Reply

Add New Comment