TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

USI president defends student turnout at Children’s Referendum

John Logue said the union advocated for a Yes vote and that thousands of students were unable to return home to vote as they were awaiting grant payments.

File
File
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

THE PRESIDENT OF the Union of Students of Ireland, John Logue, has defended the student turnout at last weekend’s Children’s Referendum.

He hit back at remarks made by Fine Gael TD, Alan Farrell, in which the Deputy asserted that the USI did not appear to have “done anything” on the Children’s Rights Referendum.

Logue said that the USI “did in fact take a stance on the referendum” as it called for a Yes vote, and that in the lead up to the referendum it worked closely with the Campaign for Children to promote the need for a ‘Yes’ vote.

In fact, we have been promoting the referendum since July when a representative of the Campaign for Children was invited to speak to incoming Students’ Unions from across the country at USI’s Students’ Union Training event about the importance of student participation in the referendum.

He said that the USI worked with Spunout.ie and Students’ Unions to organise voter registration drives on college campuses and “communicated the need for a ‘Yes’ vote to students on the ground via our member Students’ Unions”.

The USI appeared on national and local radio stations and released a joint press release with the Campaign for Children, added Logue. They also participated in a photo call with the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs, Frances Fitzgerald TD.

Logue said that “aside from the factors which deterred all other sectors of society from voting” he could point to one “glaringly obvious” reason for the low student turnout:

Thousands of students were unable to return home to vote owing to the fact that they are awaiting their first maintenance grant payment and could not cover the fare.

The referendum had an overall turnout of 33.5 per cent. The fact it was on a Saturday was thought to benefit students. Deputy Farrell said that one of the primary reasons he had pitched a bill earlier this year on moving voting for elections and referenda to Saturdays was because students had been calling for it.

Though there is no official data outlining how many students did vote, Deputy Farrell said last week that there had been a lack of public comment from the USI and this disappointed him.

Read: Students criticised for failing to get out the vote in children’s referendum>

Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • So no official data, showing the age profiles of the voters, therefore how can he say that?

    Reply
  • I’m a student and I voted, I no loads of working ppl who didn’t vote and it had nothing to do with a Saturday vote. More lack of understanding of the issue.

    Reply
  • For all that this TD knows, every student in Ireland could have voted. No age groups have been given in any sort of breakdown. The most we know is that 33% of the electorate voted.

    Reply
  • Students do not make up the 67% who did turn out. Sounds like a diversionary cheap shot by this TD. Seems they have really lined the students up as the fall guys for reverting to week day polling.

    Reply
  • be interesting to study alan kellys voting record in the dail since he ws elected,,,,,,,maybe the students he alleged did not vote decided that based on the supreme courts verdict on the information provided by the government the result would be challenged in respect of its constitutionality and may require another referendum…

    Reply
  • siobeli 18/11/12 #

    There are no official stats on the age of voters, so how do they know how many didnt vote?
    The usi president didn’t need to justify anything since the td had no official stats.
    I feel he let the student population down by saying they couldn’t afford to go home due to the delay in their grant.

    Reply
  • that’s nonsense that students can’t go home cause they are still awaiting grants. i bet the majority of people didn’t vote because they were just too lazy to walk down to the polling station. i swear if there was a voting app then everyone would vote

    Reply
  • I always had the assumption that we were an intelligent people, capable of reading, identifying the issues, weighing them up and making up our own minds. This referendum was a long time in the making, and people say they didn’t turn out because no one TOLD them! Just shows how malleable our own opinions are and influenced by media (or lack of). What kind of democracy is that?

    Reply
  • I don’t get this lets bash the students for not voting.I’m not a student and I didn’t vote either did anyone I work with. So what! Build a bridge and get over it.

    Reply
  • Sounds like the USI done plenty.

    Reply
  • After voting, I waited for about 30 mins with another FF member, at about 2.00 and the average age of the voters was over 50ish. Could this indicate that those adults likely to be effected were nervous that a yes vote was putting them and their children st risk by giving the gov too much power? Perhaps setting out the consequences of wrong or abusive decisions might have helped

    Reply
    • Barry 18/11/12 #

      Kevin, if we apply your logic then the parents would have gotten out and voted no to ensure the yes vote you claim they were so nervous about would not pass.

      Frankly I’m going to opt for option 3, people are just blame lazy and didn’t make it their business to inform themselves and couldn’t be arsed to vote.

      Because the vast majority didn’t see this vote outcomes actually affecting their lives they couldn’t care less about voting in the first place, it’s that straight forward.

      Reply
  • USI are beyond belief.. Students couldn’t afford to vote??? Holy mother of God they will spin any tripe to make it seem like students are peasants. On the contrary most didn’t vote because they didn’t give a toss.

    Reply
  • I’d imagine most students, like most voters from all areas, were yes voters and presumed it was going to fly through, and didn’t turn out to vote. That seemed to happen with yes voters across the board, hence it being so close. No voters, people motivated by scaremongering etc will always come out and vote.

    Reply
  • should have read “did NOT turn out”

    Reply
  • There is no excusing the yes vote. Turkeys voting for Christmas. I didn’t know anyone who voted yes. I asked a few people only possible explanation is party faithful who will vote with party knowing its wrong.

    It may take a generation or a war to un-do damage of austerity treaty. And the so called children’s referendum had nothing to do with children more about watering down constitution. Anyone who voted yes to either of these disgusting evil things should hang their head in shame.

    Reply

Add New Comment