TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

What was in the news in Dublin 100 years ago?

Mixed marriages, women in trousers, and a plague of birds… Here’s what was dominating the headlines in 1911.

O'Connell Street in 1911
O'Connell Street in 1911
Image: National Library of Ireland

EMIGRATION, TRAFFIC PROBLEMS and a visit from the British monarch… in many ways Dublin hasn’t changed much in the last 100 years.

But women can now wear trousers without fear of ridicule – and even vote.

A new book, Dublin 1911, compiles some of the biggest news stories that dominated the press one century ago. We’ve picked out some of the issues that grabbed headlines…

  • Emigration There were more than 80 boats sailing to Britain every week from Dublin port – but most of those who took them were people from the country passing through the capital on their way elsewhere.
  • ‘Mixed marriages’ There were protests against a decree from the Pope forbidding marriages between Catholics and Protestants – which one elected representative described as “an act of intolerable aggression on the part of a foreign power”.
  • The trouser skirt A new ‘trouser skirt’ appeared for women with two baggy legs – and invited mass ridicule that women could wear anything so mannish. “This latest freak  of fashion [...] will not be adopted by Irishwomen”, one commentator wrote.
  • The King Huge crowds lined out for the visit of King George V and Queen Mary, giving “spontaneous and cordial demonstrations of welcome”.
  • Birds A “great rush” of birds was reported across south-east Ireland on March 29 1911, appearing “like a cloud which covered several miles”. One postman reported being struck by several starlings as he cycled across a Waterford bridge.
  • Women The ‘votes for women’ campaign was stepping up, with a number of groups attempting a boycott of the 1911 census – arguing that women were not being treated as full citizens so should not be counted.
  • Motor cars Restrictions were threatened on the relatively new innovation, with some calling for speed limits on motor cars to be the same as those for horses. This meant 10mph in the city, and 20mph in the Phoenix Park.

Dublin 1911 is available in all good bookshops or online from the Royal Irish Academy, where you can read a sample snippet.

In pictures: Life in Dublin 100 years ago>

Read next:

Comments (6 Comments)

  • Love this kinda thing, looks like emigration’s been around a long time!

    Reply
  • Well done Michael, more like this and more details.

    Reply
  • If we could turn back time, we would have told those brave, but misguided, 1916 volunteers..”lads don’t bother, your descendants in FF will bring shame and poverty to your country”

    Reply
  • There is some much wrong with your patronising comment Simon. Ghandi borrowed many of his ideas from an Irishman, Daniel O’Connell, nothing new here. The problem is we’d tried the peaceful parliamentary route and been blocked, O’Connell and Parnell were jailed, military force threatened if further ‘Monster Meeting’s went ahead. The British government were not going to acceded to peaceful demands to disengage from Ireland.
    The formation and arming of the Irish Volunteers, the nucleus of the 1916 Irish forces, happened in response to the formation of the UVF who were dedicated to opposing the democratic wish of the Irish people – and indeed of the Westminster Parliament – for home rule. It was these armed men who create partition not the Dublin Rising leaders.
    As for trumpeting Ghandi’s example as a success , his approach allowed British rule to continue until 1949, I wonder if the 1.5 and 4 million people who died in 1943 Bengal Famine would have died if he had servered the link sooner? During WWII the British had more men garrisoning/policing India then they did fighting the Japanese! Yes Ghandi did finally remove the British from India but only when it became apparent that it was inevitable but in the aftermath came their own partition and the death of 100’s of the thousands of people with almost 15 million people becoming refugees and being forced to cross the newly formed border between Pakistan and India.

    Reply
  • Tell the lads of 1916 not to bother as a man named Gandhi had a much better plan in the 30′s that would not have perpetuated the Irish cycle of violence for the next 80 years. We could have had an inclusive, multi denominational Ireland, where Protestants of the North would have been curtailed from Gerrymandering and oppression through the overall Catholic majority and the oppression of the Catholic Church would have been moderated and dissipated by the Protestant leaders. Given the natural decline of the empire, there is no doubt we would have achieved independence. We invented the word Boycott. But instead we herald a group of martyrs who unintentionally turned out to be the catalyst for the partition of our island. One of the most tragic events in our history.

    Reply

Add New Comment