TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Women of the west urged to take first step into political life

The Women for Election Galway Inspire event kicked off this morning.

Niamh Gallagher and Senator Lorraine Higgins.
Niamh Gallagher and Senator Lorraine Higgins.
Image: Conor McCabe Photography

A NON-PARTISAN GROUP with an aim to get more women into politics is hosting an event in Galway today to encourage local women to become local candidates.

Women for Election has welcomed people from Galway, Clare, Mayo and Roscommon to its Inspire programme at the Harbour Hotel in the city today for a number of lectures.

Niamh Gallagher, co-founder of the organisation, told TheJournal.ie that the 35 attendees were a mix of women from Ireland’s main political parties and others who are active in community groups and the business world, as well as a number of women who are “thinking about what their next steps will be”.

“The main message of the day is to inspire women to take the next step and it has already started to work,” said Gallagher enthusiastically. “We’ve had a couple of women already raise their hands and say they didn’t understand the process but now are determined to ‘get out there and do it’.”

“We want to see practical action,” she continued. “That was the aim. There is a sense in there now that if these women don’t do it, things will not change. They can see they are supported and there is almost a duty or civil responsibility to get involved.”

The morning kicked off with a speech by Gallagher herself before Senator Lorraine Higgins spoke of her experiences in the Oireachtas over the past year.

Orlaith Carmody then gave a lecture on building confidence before Cathal Lee, a campaign strategist, demystified some of the processes around getting selected and then elected.

Before lunch, the Mayor of Galway Hildegarde Naughton went into more details about the lessons she learned when running for the first time.

The programme has received much backing from political parties with representatives from Fine Gael, Labour, Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil attending. However, Gallagher said the “proof of that support” will need to be seen in 2014 when they begin to select their candidates for the next General Election.

“We now have this group of mobilised women so we will be watching the parties selection processes to see if they are true to their word,” she said.

The notion of gender quotas has not been a focus of today’s event but Higgins mentioned them briefly in her address.

“They create opportunities but they are not the focus,” explained Gallagher. “Parties are now actively looking for women, regardless of quotas.”

The Inspire programme will continue in Dublin on 7 July and 8 September. In 2013, Women for Election is planning another series focusing on campaigns to equip potential candidates and campaign managers with the tools they need for a successful election.

“The level of interest in the INSPIRE programme, following on from very successful events in Dublin and Cork is a clear indication to Women for Election that there is no shortage of capable and competent women who could potentially make a huge contribution to public life,” concluded Gallagher.

The women at today’s event have taken to Twitter to share some of the knowledge they have gained today:

Women of the west urged to take first step into political life
1 / 6
  • Hildegarde Naughton

  • Lorraine Higgins

  • Orlaith Carmody 2

  • Orlaith Carmody 3

  • Orlaith Carmody

  • Women For Election

Read next:

Comments (32 Comments)

  • Personally I’d like to see an event to encourage young people to enter politics rather than women.

    Reply
  • They may be non-partisan, but that does not mean they are non-ideological. This is the same group that organised pro Lisbon Treaty events during the second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, at which a concerted effort to suppress anti treaty views was exercised, to the point of attempting to eject an elderly female activist at the Galway event.

    Reply
    • Thank you, I’ve been beating this drum inside my own feminist organisation and no one wanted to even listen. This group wants to co-opt women into the major parties to make their disgusting austerity policies look like they’ve a friendly face. Thanks but no thanks.

      Reply
    • Elena + Martin
      Thanks . I have been reading a little bit more this evening and I agree that it all looks toogood to be wholesome , also where are they being funded from ?

      Reply
    • Attendance costs €99, so I assume through that. Like any event really promoting proper equality would charge such a crazy fee. What’s it being spent on I’d like to know? Appearance fees for these FG and Labour mouthpieces?

      Reply
  • Why should similar support not be provided for men. This entire issue is beginning to look as if the female of the species have some sort of special needs when the actual reason for most women being disinterested in politics is something that quotas and fines will never fix.
    Why are an overwhelming majority of our Nurses and Primary teacher of the female gender and what are we doing about it. Should we impose fines on the relevant Ministers if these imbalances are not corrected over the next few years with imaginative inducements for men to apply.

    Reply
    • Couldn’t agree more Richard, aren’t women the majority in this country of ours about 51% if I remember right?

      Reply
    • My perception of the differences you outline Richard is that men do not tend to want to enter those professions, where as for women who want to enter politics there are real and perceived barriers. Perhaps efforts should be made to encourage more males to enter both professions. This event seems to aimed as clarifying the issues, providing support for overcoming the real barriers and discussing and debunking perceived barriers. Gender is clearly a factor in becoming a politician, you can’t just ignore it or call those who discuss it or try remedy it sexist.

      Reply
    • Eleen 16/06/12 #

      Pierce2020 – if women are the majority then there’s a serious problem with our public representative situation in politics right now.

      It’d be sexist if there was a decent amount of women in politics already. There isn’t. It’s a joke. And this is a much better way of getting women involved than, say, quotas – wouldn’t you agree?

      Reply
  • Pure sexism, in my humble opinion.

    Reply
  • I dont view this campaign as a threat to anything and welcome this initiative. However, I would like to see people being enthused to become more political and to back or assist the best person to run as opposed to a specific gender.
    The barriers for all genders need diminishing and the obvious financial issues of anyone who wants to run needs to also be addressed.

    Reply
  • Quotas are by their very nature discriminatory, where do they stop? The point being made about the huge gulf in numbers of men teaching, particularly at primary level, is very valid. Of the women named at this event I can recall none of them ever coming out and speaking about that particular issue.

    Yes, we need a lot more women involved in politics but not through quotas.

    Reply
    • These women aren’t promoting quotas. They’re basically running support groups for women interested in running. I *really* can’t see why this is controversial, as this is in no way infringing on people’s right to vote for whoever they want…

      Reply
    • So what are you doing to get more men involved in education and nursing? Where do we sign up to support this campaign for gender equality? Cause I’m all for it!

      Reply
    • Many of the comments seem to equate tackling one element of equality, i.e. lower representation of women in politics with ignoring other areas where men are discriminated against. They seem angry about the organisers not trying to fix everything in one fell swoop. Rome wasn’t built in a day, these people are doing something constructive, they are taking irrational pot shots while doing nothing, if they are so bothered do some thing about it. An initiative to encourage men to become nurses and primary school teachers as main example in this thread outlines would be welcome by most, especially those taking part in this conference I would guess.

      Reply
    • I totally disagree the concept that you and other people, Auntie Dote, have that politics is just like any other career. While it can seem that TDs are just are in it for the job, I do think that in a representative democracy, a broader range of politicians benefit the people. I’d like to see more diversity in the Dail of race, age, gender and membership of the LGBT community.

      I have very mixed feelings on quotas (democratic reasons), but I think initiatives which reassure people who wouldn’t ordinarily get involved in politics that it just isn’t that scary are to be welcomed.

      Reply
  • Sinead, would it be possible for the journal to challenge Women for Election’s claims of being non-partisan? They openly state they grew from the grouping Women for Europe which urged a yes vote for Nice and Lisbon. Seeing as all political parties in the state either took one side or the other on those issues does that not explicitly conflict the definition of non-partisanship? Thanks

    Reply
  • Peter 16/06/12 #

    Women should not be in politics .. They need to take example from the Crystal Swing women

    Reply
  • Men don’t want to be nurses or primary school teachers according to one comment and we march on with further aid for women as if they belonged to a sub species or have special needs !
    And it is all done with a big stick……massive financial penalties for Parties who don’t elect candidates for elections….note what I said…..electing candidates……because that’s how Parties carry out their selection procedures.
    But what if there are two equally qualified parsons who wish to stand for election where one is a woman and the other a man.
    Does the Covention elect the woman as a candidate to avoid fines or the man because he’s better looking. That’s the kind of joke we are implementing with this rubbish idea.

    Reply
    • Actually that’s what has actually been happening for centuries. If there are two equally qualified candidates the man wins. For the woman to be selected she has to be super qualified. Levelling the playing field means no more excuses for overlooking qualified women, that’s all.

      I’d say, the people threatened by actual equality would be the less qualified men who used to depend on a system that let them parachute in over the heads of better women, and now might have to actually perform.

      Reply
  • What party is Niamh Gallagher from ?

    Reply
  • H

    Reply

Add New Comment