TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Woman given probation after drunk driver kills her son

Raquel Nelson was charged with vehicular homicide after her son was killed as they crossed the road without using a pedestrian crossing.

A WOMAN IN the US, who was convicted of vehicular homicide after a drunk driver killed her son as he was crossing the street, has been given a year of probation and offered a new trial to clear her name.

Raquel Nelson was crossing the road with her three children in Marietta, Georgia when she, her son and her daughter were hit by a car. Four-year-old AJ was killed, while Nelson and her daughter suffered minor injuries.

The driver fled the scene but was later sentenced to five years in prison. He was released after six months.

Nelson, who is 30, was convicted of homicide by vehicle in the second degree. She was also convicted of jaywalking – that is, crossing the road where there was no pedestrian crossing, and reckless conduct.

She could have been handed down 36 months in jail, but the judge gave Nelson a probation sentence which includes 40 hours of community service, but he also made the unusual move of offering her a new trial. If she’s found innocent, her record would be cleared.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that fines of $1,000 which could be applied for each count have also been suspended.

Nelson’s attorney David Savoy has said that they will take the judge up on the offer of a new trial.

ABC reports that prosecutors never intended to seek jail time for Nelson. She has said that she’s had little time to grieve properly because of the legal proceedings.

She crossed the road to her apartment after getting off a bus with her three children. The nearest pedestrian crossing was a third of a mile up the street.

More: Mother convicted of vehicular homicide after drunk driver killed her child>

- Additional reporting by AP

Read next:

Comments (13 Comments)

  • Andy 26/07/11 #

    Hold on a second…the women crossing the road with her children was convicted of homicide by vehicle in the second degree but the drunk driver who hit them was sentenced to 5 years but was out after 6 months?

    Reply
  • So she was convicted of crossing the road?

    Reply
  • This was reported a few days ago, and it smelt a bit of KKK to me, and as reported by Democracy now, it seems to have that rotten stink:
    http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/20/headlines/african_american_mother_faces_more_jail_time_than_drunk_driver_who_killed_her_son

    This link appears in the original article

    African American woman, All White Jury, Driver was almost blind, and low and behold didn`t he crash in the same place before, and doesn`t he even have two convictions for DUI on the same day, and one of them at the same place where he killed the child.
    Now Phil, I understand we dont have all the facts, but does this not smell a bit off to you?

    Reply
  • This sickens me, when are we all going to wake up and hold the criminals responsible?! This person was DRUNK, driving a vehicle with poor judgement and reflexes! This woman has endured enough heartache, give me a break and her too!

    Reply
  • Prosecution need to take a long look at themselves!

    Reply
  • WOW, every government in the world are complaining of over-crowded prisons yet they think its right to send this grieving mother to jail for crossing the road?

    Reply
  • Smell a bit off, it bleedin’ stinks. The git that hit them walks away after 6 months and she has a conviction for walking across the road and must face a retrial to clear her name, that doesn’t come cheap in America.

    Reply
  • Typical North American bullshit!

    Reply
  • Who the fuck is thumbs downing these comments?!!!!! C’mon you evil little pathetic shits, put your case forward.

    Reply
  • Phil 26/07/11 #

    Nobody reading this story as told here has sufficient info to criticise the procecution of this case.

    Regardless of whether the driver was drunk or not, the woman walked out in front of a moving car with the children in tow – reckless and negligent. Her level of culpability is not diminished by the fact that the river was drunk. Their punishment should be handled independently.

    The prosecutor would have evidence of how relevant the drivers blood alcohol level was to the ultimate result of the accident. It is possible that the reduction in his reaction time was not sufficient to be a deciding factor in the outcome – in other words, if he was stone cold sober the result may have been the same.

    We don’t have the info in this article to know either way, lets assume the prosecutor and judge did.

    Reply
    • You’re either a total scumbag or a windup merchant. My sister was killed by a drunk driver in 1976. The pain my parents had to endure was indescribable. Their grief was compounded by the fact that the driver of the car was ordered to pay over

      Reply
    • Jim Corr 27/07/11 #

      Class

      Reply
    • My comment was cut off on my phone it should have read:

      You’re either a total scumbag or a windup merchant. My sister was killed by a drunk driver in 1976. The pain my parents had to endure was indescribable. Their grief was compounded by the fact that the driver of the car was ordered to pay over £11 in “compensation”, probably equivalent to about €200 today. My mother, racked by guilt, had this thrown in her face. The driver in question was allowed to DRIVE home from the court. By your reckoning, my Mam should have been done for reckless neglect for allowing her 13 year old daughter out on her bike at all. The woman in the article is hurting about as bad as a person can hurt and you believe that a charge of 2nd degree vehicular homicide should be applied… Cop on.

      On another note altogether, would this same charge have been meted out to an upwardly mobile, middle class white woman in the exact same circumstances… I don’t think so.

      Reply

Add New Comment