Skip to content
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
William Black before a US congressional hearing in April 2010
William Black before a US congressional hearing in April 2010
Image: Screengrab via YouTube

After weeks of boredom, the banking inquiry could get very interesting today...

No, seriously…
Feb 5th 2015, 7:15 AM 17,437 30

THE BANKING INQUIRY has been widely viewed as a pretty mundane affair so far with experts telling the Oireachtas committee much of what we already know about the crisis.

While the hearings have been informative and somewhat illuminating, particularly when Central Bank governor Patrick Honohan was before the committee last month, many members have privately admitted it hasn’t been very exciting.

However, the inquiry will today hear from Professor William ‘Bill’ Black of the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Black is widely-respected expert in banking fraud who recently helped the World Bank develop a series of anti-corruption initiatives.

He will be talking about banking policy, systems and practices before TDs and Senators and his central thesis is that the leading cause of catastrophic bank failures has long been senior insider fraud.

Inquiry sources said that they expected his evidence to be “colourful”. Legal advisors expressed concern at a private session yesterday that Black could stray beyond the inquiry’s legal remit in his evidence today.

Here is Black testifying before a US congressional hearing into the collapse of Lehman Brothers in April 2010:

Source: OccupyAustin/YouTube

Black has argued that the large salaries paid to some senior bankers results in the encouragement of fraud and has written extensively on the “perverse effects of compensation” in the banking sector.

Black has previously been harshly critical of Finnish banking expert Peter Nyberg’s report into the Irish crisis, arguing that his report had ignored alleged accounting control fraud in the Irish banking sector.

Nyberg, who appeared before the committee last December, said in his 2011 report that the willingness of banks to issue high-value loans for risky commercial property was a fundamental cause of the banking crash. He said the bank guarantee was issued on the belief that the Irish banks were solvent, when in fact they were not.

During a private meeting of the banking inquiry yesterday concerns were raised by legal advisers as to what can be expected from Black’s evidence to the committee.

It’s understood he submitted a lengthy, 75-page document to the inquiry for its consideration, but his official evidence will be confined to his opening statement.

Also appearing before the inquiry today will be Mario Nava from the European Commission who will given evidence on banking regulation and supervision with the EU’s regulation in the run-up to the financial crisis likely to be discussed.

Separately, the inquiry said yesterday evening that the Central Bank governor Patrick Honohan would be assisting it in seeking cooperation from the European Central Bank.

Committee chairman Ciarán Lynch said: “Governor Honohan has agreed to open dialogue with the ECB to assist the Committee. The Committee has agreed to proceed with this line of engagement to explore and develop how the ECB can co-operate with the Inquiry and assist the Committee in advancing its work.”

First published 04 February 2015

Breakthrough: Jean-Claude Trichet could take part in the banking inquiry after all (sort of)

Read all of our banking inquiry coverage here > 

Send a tip to the author

Hugh O'Connell


    Back to top