Skip to content

Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Harvey Weinstein's defence attorney Donna Rotunno.
Harvey Weinstein's defence attorney Donna Rotunno.
Image: Richard Drew/PA Images

'Block out the noise': Weinstein lawyer urges jury to 'be unpopular' and acquit movie mogul of rape

In closing arguments, Donna Rotunno said prosecutors had created “an alternative universe” in which the former producer was a “monster”.
Feb 13th 2020, 10:53 PM 14,559 0

HARVEY WEINSTEIN’S DEFENCE team urged jurors to be “unpopular” and acquit the ex-Hollywood titan of rape and predatory sexual assault charges, suggesting he was a victim of the #MeToo movement.

In closing arguments lasting over four hours, lead attorney Donna Rotunno said prosecutors had created “an alternative universe” in which the former producer was a “monster” who preyed on aspiring actresses, but had not provided any evidence to convict.

“He was innocent when he walked through the door. He was innocent when witnesses started to take the stand. He is innocent as he sits here right now,” Rotunno told the New York court.

Weinstein, 67, faces life imprisonment if convicted of predatory sexual assault charges in the high-profile trial that marks a watershed moment in the #MeToo global reckoning against men abusing positions of power.

Six women took the stand to say they were sexually assaulted by Weinstein, allegations the fallen movie mogul denies.

Rotunno reminded the 12 jurors that they are considering charges related to just two women: ex-actress Jessica Mann and former production assistant Mimi Haleyi.

Mann says Weinstein raped her in March 2013 while Haleyi alleges he forcibly performed oral sex on her in July 2006.

“From an overzealous media, from an overzealous prosecution, you are being asked to make an unpopular decision,” Rotunno told the jury, asking them “to block out the noise” surrounding the proceedings.

“Never let your emotion cloud your intellect. Use your New York City common sense. It will guide you to the right answer,” she added.

sexual-misconduct-weinstein Harvey Weinstein arrives at court in his rape trial in New York. Source: Richard Drew/PA Images

The trial has raised complicated issues surrounding consent and abuse of power for the jury of seven men and five women.

Under cross-examination, both Mann and Haleyi acknowledged at least one consensual sexual encounter with Weinstein after the alleged assaults.

Rotunno repeatedly referred to dozens of emails and texts the defence presented during the trial that show the accusers on friendly terms with Weinstein years after the alleged incidents.

“The truth leaves a paper trail,” she said, asking the jurors to study the “real-time evidence” not a world created by the prosecution “where women don’t have free-will.”


“In their universe women are not responsible for parties they attend, the men they flirt with… or the jobs they ask help to obtain,” Rotunno added, suggesting women used Weinstein to advance their own careers.

She said the accusers only decided they had been assaulted after Weinstein became a global pariah when allegations against him ignited #MeToo in October 2017.

Rotunno added that Weinstein became “the target of a cause” and said Mann had been manipulated by the prosecution.

“I feel sorry for Jessica Mann. She’s a victim of the state,” Rotunno said.

She highlighted the absence of forensic evidence and said it was unusual for a criminal trial not to feature testimony from police officers.

The lawyer also suggested that the women who testified would have gotten themselves tested for sexually transmitted diseases if they had been attacked.

Weinstein faces five counts, including predatory sexual assault, rape and engaging in a criminal sexual act.

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

Rotunno reminded jurors that to convict they must be sure of the defendant’s guilt beyond all reasonable doubt.

“It’s not a small doubt, it’s not a little doubt,” she said.

Lead prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon complained to Justice James Burke that her counterpart had cited information that hadn’t been included in evidence, an allegation Rotunno denied.

The prosecution will present its closing arguments tomorrow before jurors begin considering Weinstein’s fate on Tuesday next week.

They must reach unanimous verdicts on each count. If they are unable, the judge may be forced to declare a mistrial.

A split verdict is possible where Weinstein is convicted of some charges and cleared of others.

Accused of sexual misconduct by more than 80 women, Weinstein faces a separate sex crimes investigation in Los Angeles and is the subject of several civil complaints.

Weinstein laughed and smiled as he left court, clearly delighted with Rotunno’s performance.

© – AFP 2020

Send a tip to the author



    Back to top