This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 14 °C Tuesday 4 August, 2020

Polish workers lose discrimination case over McDonald’s English-only policy

Grzegorz Delanowski and Leszek Pajak claimed their employer’s English-only policy discriminated against them on the basis of race.

Image: Anthony Devlin/PA Archive/PA Images

THE EQUALITY TRIBUNAL has ruled against two Polish workers who claimed their employer’s English-only policy discriminated against them on the basis of race.

Grzegorz Delanowski and Leszek Pajak have been employed by Kellsydan Ltd, which operates four McDonald’s franchises in Limerick, since 2005 and 2007 respectively.

They brought the discrimination case on the basis that the company insists employees use English at all times.

The rule applies to the restaurant floor and kitchen area as well as in meetings with management, where the complainants said disputes have arisen over translation during disciplinary hearings.

The respondent stated that company policy does not ban employees from speaking any language other than English and that it recognises it might sometimes be appropriate when a customer initiates a conversation in another language.

It also claimed that employees are allowed to speak their own language during their break, provided that no other employee is being excluded.

The company said it uses English as its business language to ensure inclusion and business efficiency, as well as for health and safety reasons.

Tribunal Equality Officer Caroline McEnery said she was satisfied that any one of these three reasons justifies the use of English as a business language and that the complainants had failed to establish a case of discriminatory treatment.

The two rulings can be read here and here

Read: Woman awarded €33k after security guard ‘massaged her buttocks’

Read: ‘It’s very hard to compete with a company that doesn’t pay any taxes’ – Supermac’s chief

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article

About the author:

Catherine Healy

Read next: