Skip to content

Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Image: Council of the European Union

Noonan: Ireland will escape bailout, even if we can't recover bank costs

The finance minister says the world recognises that Ireland’s debts are sustainable, but he won’t give up on help.
Jun 20th 2013, 6:58 PM 6,471 53

MICHAEL NOONAN has said Ireland will be able to raise funds independently of the Troika and escape its bailout – even if it cannot secure a deal to recover some of its costs in saving the banking sector.

Noonan is joining his counterparts from the other EU member states for two days of talks in Luxembourg, where ministers are expected to formulate new rules governing who should have to foot the bill if a Eurozone banks needs saving in the future.

The talks are also due to discuss draft proposals on how the Eurozone’s new bailout fund, the ESM, will be used to save ailing banks – and whether it can be used retrospectively in Ireland’s case to recover some of the €64.1 billion that Irish taxpayers have spent on their own banks.

Of that investment, €34.7 billion was invested in Anglo and Irish Nationwide – which are now being liquidated in their combined IBRC format – but the remaining €29.4 billion could still be recouped, if Ireland is able to convince other Eurozone members that the ESM should work retrospectively.

This afternoon, on his way into the talks in Brussels, Noonan said Ireland’s recent financial activity – including the liquidation of IBRC and the tearing up of the promissory notes – had assured the world that “the Irish debt position is sustainable”.

The question of recouping some of its banking costs from the ESM was “no longer directly related to sustainability,” the minister added. “We have negotiated to a point where the debt is fully sustainable.”

However, Noonan remained upbeat about the possibility of being able to secure funding from the ESM – which would effectively buy Ireland’s stake in the banks, acting as if it had been in place in 2009 and 2010 when the banks first needed help from the taxpayer.

“We’ve always argued that Ireland is an exceptional case,” he said.

We’re not arguing this case for all our colleagues in the Eurozone. We’re arguing this case for Ireland. We’re saying, in effect, we were forced into a position by the ECB where we weren’t allowed [to] ‘bail in’ senior bondholders.

If the ESM rules that are now emerging were in place two years ago, when we recapitalised the banks, the ESM would have assisted the recapitalisation. That’s our case for retrospective application.

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.

Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

Asked about the comments of his German counterpart Wolfgang Schauble, who had told reporters he had “little leeway” to use the ESM for retrospective funding, Noonan said he interpreted this positively.

“I agree with Wolfgang: the scope is narrow, because there aren’t other countries which were refused to so something as a policy issue which is now being advocated.”

Tomorrow’s meeting is expected to sign off on a revised schedule for Ireland to repay the European parts of its bailout loans, giving Ireland an average of seven years more to repay each loan.

Read: EU faces talks on bank sector reform and who should pay for future bailouts

More: ‘The ESM for legacy bank debt should be allowed’ – former AG Peter Sutherland

Send a tip to the author

Gavan Reilly


    Back to top