Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Photo by Espen Moe
VOICES

Who to believe in the Wikileaks rape case?

The case for and against the Wikileaks founder – as the bloggers see it.

A Swedish prosecutor’s decision to reopen the rape case against Julian Assange gives new life to the ongoing debates about WikiLeaks. Assange, the site’s founder, has not only denied ever having had “nonconsensual sex” with the two women who have accused him, but has also insinuated that the American government could be behind the accusations, driving a Pentagon smear campaign designed to neutralize Assange and his troublesome organization.

Is this likely? And what, if anything, does this bizarre chapter in the WikiLeaks story say about its founder–or the Swedish legal system, for that matter?

Read one side of story at The Atlantic Wireand then read the other at the Fabius Maximus blog.