Skip to content
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Image: Laura Hutton via

Taxi driver abused friendship of elderly man and tried taking his home through disputed homemade will, judge says

Seamus Conroy was not in court to hear Judge O’Connor refuse judicial recognition of the disputed will.
Dec 20th 2021, 7:26 PM 41,899 0

CO KILDARE TAXI driver Seamus Conroy had abused the friendship of an innocent, vulnerable old man he lifted on a Dublin street, eventually took control of his finances and tried to acquire his €275,000 home and contents through a disputed homemade will, a judge said today. 

Judge John O’Connor said that while “unconscionable conduct” was a more appropriate description of Conroy’s behaviour than civil fraud, Conroy (67) had nevertheless befriended, dominated and controlled Joe Kavanagh and his finances until he had died at the age of 85 when Conroy tried to win the vulnerable pensioner’s home for himself. 

Conroy, a shared Lotto winner and former photographer with the Irish Press, lives at Beatty Grove, Celbridge, and was not in court to hear Judge O’Connor refuse judicial recognition of the disputed will.

The taximan and part time property developer had earlier shed tears in court as he outlined “a bond” that had developed between him and Kavanagh who he drove to and from the sick-bed of his wife Frances in St Mary’s Care Hospital, Phoenix Park. 

Judge O’Connor told barrister Rory de Bruir, who appeared for Kavanagh’s solicitor Cormac O’Ceallaigh, that Conroy’s home-made will was not valid under the 1965 Succession Act and even if it was the whole domination and control by Conroy over Kavanagh gave rise to a presumption of undue influence. 

“Mr Conroy retained control of the document after it was executed and Mr Kavanagh never received any independent legal advice,” the judge said. 

He said Kavanagh was a much weaker person who was totally dependent on Conroy and the relationship and the making of the alleged will was not one consistent with good conscience. 

“Far from being a good friend, the relationship was one in which Mr Conroy ensured Mr Kavanagh was reliant on him to the exclusion of other people,” Judge O’Connor said.

“He was determined to and did take control of Mr Kavanagh’s money and attempted to take control of his dwelling house at Swords Street, Oxmanstown Road, Stoneybatter, Dublin. 

Judge O’Connor said Conroy, in legal terms, had taken advantage of an innocent and but vulnerable person who had been unable to make a worthwhile judgment of what was in his best interests.

“The tragedy is that no one reported Conroy’s conduct to the HSE which is charged with safeguarding vulnerable persons at risk of abuse. The matter does not appear to be investigated by the HSE,” the judge said. 

Judge O’Connor said Conroy controlled both the process and the retention of the home-made will until after Kavanagh’s death and for these reasons the court dismissed Conroy’s claim to admit the will to probate thereby establishing its validity. The court also refused Conroy’s application to revoke an earlier valid will made by Kavanagh through his solicitors Cormac O’Ceallaigh. 

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

During the trial of the legal dispute Conroy said he had been waved down by Kavanagh in North Circular Road, Dublin, and afterwards had made a deal to bring him daily to and from the hospital for €30 a day, payable in weekly amounts of €210. The understanding had lasted for several years until Kavanagh’s death. 

In his earlier valid will Kavanagh had bequeathed 60% of his nett estate to charities and divided the remainder between two nieces. Money was to go for the upkeep of priests and church buildings, parish funds, the Legion of Mary Concillium and St Peter’s church, Phibsborough, Dublin. 

O’Ceallaigh told the court that when Kavanagh’s home had been put on the market as per the original will, a purchaser paid a deposit of €7,000. Swain Solicitors on behalf of Conroy had written to O’Ceallaigh indicating they were in possession of a final will appointing Conroy as Executor and that no further steps be taken in connection with the sale.

Judge O’Connor said the charities mentioned in the original will should be apprised of the legal proceedings and rulings of the court.

Send a tip to the author

Ray Managh


    Back to top