Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

russian meeting

Trump personally dictated misleading statement for his son, Washington Post reports

The paper said the president dictated the statement to his son while on a flight home from the G20 summit in Germany.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP personally dictated a misleading statement in which his son Donald Trump Jr said a meeting with a Russian lawyer during the 2016 election was focused on adoptions, according to The Washington Post.

It later emerged that during that fateful June 2016 meeting, Trump’s eldest son, his son-in-law Jared Kushner and then campaign manager Paul Manafort met with a Russian government lawyer who an intermediary claimed had incriminating information about Trump’s rival Hillary Clinton.

The subject line of the email from Trump Jr inviting Kushner and Manafort to the meeting read “Russia – Clinton – private and confidential”.

Trump Medal of Honor Pablo Martinez Monsivais Pablo Martinez Monsivais

In his initial statement on the meeting, Trump Jr said the group “primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children,” and insisted that “it was not a campaign issue at the time and there was no followup”.

The Post said the president dictated the statement to his son while on a flight home from the G20 summit in Germany.

Trump Jr later sent shockwaves through Washington by releasing a series of emails that detailed how he had attended the meeting after being promised “very high level and sensitive information” that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr Trump”.

Trump has rushed to his son’s defence, and lambasted what he calls a political “witch hunt”.

In defending his son, Trump said: “I think from a practical standpoint most people would have taken that meeting… Politics is not the nicest business in the world, but it’s very standard”.

Citing people familiar with the discussions, the Post said the president’s legal team planned to present the meeting as a potential setup by Democrats seeking to entrap Trump Jr and thus Trump himself, who at the time was the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

The meeting with lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya has thrust Trump Jr into the centre of a growing scandal over whether Trump’s associates colluded with Moscow to tilt the 2016 election in the Republican’s favour.

Donald Trump, Jr. arrives at Trump Tower SIPA USA / PA Images SIPA USA / PA Images / PA Images

Former FBI director Robert Mueller is probing, in his capacity as special counsel, the Russia connection independently of the Senate panels.

‘Unnecessary’ 

The Post said advisers worry that the extent of Trump’s direct involvement in his son’s response could put the president — already under fire for other efforts to undermine the Russia probe — and key advisers in legal jeopardy.

“This was… unnecessary,” one presidential adviser told the Post on condition of anonymity.

Now someone can claim he’s the one who attempted to mislead. Somebody can argue the president is saying he doesn’t want you to say the whole truth.

Suggesting Trump is increasingly acting as his own lawyer, strategist and publicist, the adviser added: “He refuses to sit still.

“He doesn’t think he’s in any legal jeopardy, so he really views this as a political problem he is going to solve by himself.”

One of Trump’s lawyers, Jay Sekulow, said in response to the report:

Apart from being of no consequence, the characterisations are misinformed, inaccurate and not pertinent.

- © AFP, 2017

Read: Scaramucci removed from post just 10 days into the job >

Read: Actor and playwright Sam Shepard has died aged 73 >

Your Voice
Readers Comments
23
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.