Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Benedek Alpar
National Broadband Plan

Removing 300,000 homes from original broadband plan 'made original tender less attractive'

That was according to the Secretary General of the Department of Communications Mark Griffin.

TAKING OUT 300,000 commercially viable households from the National Broadband Plan tender made it a less attractive sell to other bidders, according to the Secretary General of the Department of Communications Mark Griffin. 

Speaking before the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee today, Sinn Féin’s David Cullinane asked if the removal of around 300,000 households from the original tender changed the dynamic of the tender itself.

Eir had entered into a contract to deliver fibre broadband to the households, which the secretary general acknowledged today were more commercially viable. 

Eir subsequently announced that they were withdrawing their bid for the NBP tender process having already rolled out fibre broadband – which is a higher quality, higher speed broadband, to 70% of homes across Ireland – but about 540,000 homes and businesses still remained unconnected (and still are). 

The National Broadband Plan aims to give 750,000 premises nationwide a minimum download speed of 30Mbps. This also covers Irish businesses that currently have no access to broadband from commercial operators.

What company will roll out broadband to the remainder 540,000 homes – households that are less accessible – has become a headache for government, due to only one remaining tender, Granahan McCourt led by David McCourt, in the mix.

Tensions around the plan have escalated, due to confirmation that meetings between McCourt and the then Minister for Communications Denis Naughten took place, many of which took place in an informal capacity, with no officials present and no minutes taken. 

Griffin told the committee today that the State can only intervene when no market operator will provide services. He said Eir made a proposal to the department to roll out services to the 300,000. However, this would in turn reduce the overall scale of the households up for grabs in the original tender. 

The secretary general said the department consulted with the EU Commission about whether there was latitude for the government to refuse such a deal when it is on the table.

He said it was made clear to them under EU State aid rules that the Irish government would have no option to decline the offer. 

When asked if the removal of those 300,000 homes made the overall tender less attractive to the remaining bidders, Griffin said: 

“I think it is a reasonable conclusion to draw.”

Cullinane said it would appear that the decision to do so seriously compromised the viability of the project, possibly fatally.

“Rural Ireland has suffered as a result – with significant consequences in terms of investment, growth and viability. We need, therefore, to get to the heart of the decision to change the tender in 2016 and why it was taken.

“The PAC needs to do its job. It needs to investigate the tendering process and I hope this becomes a key part of the Committee’s work in the new year.

“Public oversight demands that we do so,” he said. 

On the meetings between McCourt and Naughten, the secretary general said he did not recall telling the communications minister at the time that some of the meetings being held might not be appropriate. He said he was not aware of any private meetings between the two men. 

However, he added there were meetings held with other bidders also, such as Eir on 23 January where Griffin said officials told the CEO that the company was being premature in walking away from the tender. 

Separately, a discussion on the Smyth report into the National Broadband Plan and meetings between David McCourt and former Communications Minister Denis Naughten took place at the committee. 

Rollout of 5G 

Also today, the secretary general was asked by Fianna Fáil’s Marc McSharry whether the department should be focusing on the roll out of 5G rather than fibre broadband to the home. 

Griffin said a recent Comreg report said that 5G is not a substitute for fibre, and is merely “complementary” to fibre. 

McSharry questioned which would be more cost-effective, seeing as the NBP costs appear to be spiralling. 

Griffin said to get 5G coverage to 99.5% of the country, over 6,000 additional masts would be needed, and would cost around €1.8bn.  

Your Voice
Readers Comments
31
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel