TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 18 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Almost 1 in 3 Irish children deprived of basic necessities

Even in well-off homes 28 per cent of kids are going without one or more key items, a survey has found.

Image: Dave Thompson/PA Archive/Press Association Images

ALMOST ONE IN three children in Ireland are going without one or more basic necessities, according to a new study.

Research carried out by Barnardos and St Vincent de Paul shows that 30.5 per cent of children are deprived of at least one item from a list of 12 key indicators considered necessary for childhood. The list includes a warm coat in winter, a bed and bedding of their own, and three balanced meals a day.

The two charities said traditional poverty measures do not adequately reflect children’s own experience of deprivation, and the study carried out by the Children’s Research Centre at Trinity College Dublin was intended to approach the issue from a child’s perspective. It found that deprivation can be experienced by children even in relatively well-off households, with 28 per cent of kids in homes classified as ‘non-deprived’ still going without one or more items from the list of 12.

It also found that 58 per cent of children living in ‘deprived’ households had access to all 12 necessities on the list.

Fergus Finlay, CEO of Barnardos, said: “Children have spoken and what they are clearly saying to us is that poverty and deprivation mean different things to children than they do to adults. It is vital that we listen to children’s voices. If we don’t hear what they say about their experiences of poverty, then we can’t find ways to limit the impact of poverty on young lives.”

The list of  necessities used in the study was compiled by interviewing a representative cross-section of children. The full list was as follows:

  • Three balanced meals each day with fruit / vegetables and meat / fish
  • Enough of the right clothes for different seasons, e.g. a coat to keep warm and dry in winter
  • Separate bed and bedding of their own
  • Their own books for reading for fun
  • Food and drinks for friends when they call over to play
  • Own money for school activities or days out
  • A family holiday once a year (can be in Ireland or abroad)
  • Day out with family at least twice a year (e.g. go to beach, fun fair, leisure centres)
  • Visit to a restaurant for a family meal at least twice a year
  • A bank, post office or Credit Union account to save money
  • Shops close to home (e.g. food shops, clothes shops or chemist)
  • A trip to the library

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • People will have to start sharing stuff around the neighbourhoods again liked they used to do before everyone got too proud – I remember being so suprised to see another girl wearing my coat in the playground which my mother had passed on without telling me, this used to be common practice and its better for the environment too – a lot of people want everything new now which is just wasteful.

    Reply
    • yes saffron, this is the way it should be,never did anybody any harm.we still do it in our family and i got a leather double bed off of next door last week for my daughter and i have given them paint,food stuffs that they have ran out of. and where we live would be considered middle class.some people lost the run of themselves in past years,but thank god the old ways are slowley but surely coming back

      Reply
  • That list is a nonsense. This is just charities trying to create a story. A real measure of child poverty would be useful. This is not.

    Reply
    • If you did some research, you would find a real measure of child poverty. Read the article- it’s what the children want! Even though them wanting to go on holiday may sound ridiculous to you, but they haven’t the capacity to fully understand a recession. If the article was about what kids wanted to be when they grew up and the list included “Power Ranger” “Pokemon” “A horse” “famous”…you’d laugh it off.

      Reply
  • A family holiday once a year (can be in Ireland or abroad)
    Own money for school activities or days out
    A bank, post office or Credit Union account to save money
    Shops close to home

    wow i had a deprived childhood and didnt know till now. What a load of crap, all a child needs is food, warmth and love stupid damn survey after making me mad.

    Reply
    • I agree, the one and only thing a child needs is to feel the love of a family. To grow up safe and happy. Most of the thing on the list are “nice” to have but not exactly essential. To grow up with a strong moral sence is also needed. To feel rich you need money, to be rich you have to be happy.

      Reply
  • Necessities?

    Visit to a restaurant for a family meal at least twice a year
    Food and drinks for friends when they call over to play

    I hardly think either of the above are necessities for children, sure they are nice to have but they arent going without because they dont go to restaurants.

    Reply
    • These are necessities for children, not for adults, they may seem silly or frivolous to you, but to a child they may be important – which if you had read the article properly you would have seen that it was more about listening to childrens needs than to what adults think is best.

      Reply
    • Tim, no-one’s saying that kids need to suffer; but according to that list, I spent the happiest years of my childhood in deprivation. Warm clothing, shelter, food – those are necessities, yes. But family holidays aren’t and as to pocket money, it’s as much a necessity for a child as their own car.

      Reply
    • Remember that the list was compiled after interviewing children, they have different ideas as to what is important in their lives. They probably would’ve said “a holiday”, or.”day out”, or “family meal”, because that’s what they see their other friends doing. Kids can be socially excluded too, most of the time they aren’t aware of it. Anyways, this is much different to the list on the Social Inclusion website http://www.socialinclusion.ie/poverty.html Note that the list isn;t child-based, it’s about what can be viewed as consistent poverty.

      Reply
  • I’m surprised such well intentioned charities such as Barnardo’s and SVP have released such drivel and of their own research (if the accuracy of the article is intact) Surely a charity is called upon to help in a situation where children do with ACTUAL basic necessities, such as a safe, clean environment, such as a proper meals. Are we really calling children who don’t go on a holiday destitute? What this article is saying (and doesn’t shy away from) is that this list is a children’s definition of poverty, sweet but serious? Come off it.
    Surely these charities should be putting focus on where it is most needed, struggling families who have lost one or more income earners are making choices between their children’s clothing and food.

    Reply
  • Luckily the Irish State via Fianna Same have a solution.

    This week alone they will be handing over €3 Billion to UNSECURED bondholders. This is to people we have no legal or moral obligation too whatsoever. €3 Billion to folks who bet and lost. Except in this casino they never loose. That falls to us and our childen

    Reply
  • It would seem that like most people I had a very deprived childhood, although it was a long time ago unfortunately! While I have great respect for the work of the SVdP and Barnardos, they have done themselves no favours here with this report. To me the list is a typical middle-class, urban view of what constitutes “basic necessities”.

    Some of the items have no place on a list that is supposed to catalogue deprivation. For example does this mean that children who live in rural areas where shops aren’t close by are considered deprived? And if a child doesn’t like books and doesn’t want to go to a library or read them is he/she deprived?

    But even with these figures, lets turn this around. According to this report 70% of children have all of the items listed above (their own bank accounts, regular holidays, visits to restaurants, food and drink for friends if they call over). That seems like a very well cared for society if you looked at it from that point of view.

    I’d like to see the breakdown on percentages for each individual item to get a more realistic view of this discussion. Nobody can deny that child poverty exists and severe poverty in some cases but this does nothing to help boost that argument.

    Reply
  • It turns out that not only was I was a deprived child but I’m also a deprived adult!!!!

    Reply
  • Jesus I must have been on the edge of cruelty then :) I didn’t have the last 10 on the list !:)

    Reply
  • There appears to be something wrong with the metric. ‘Deprived’ presumably means ‘Deprived of the necessities’.

    So, by that assertion, shouldn’t 100% of the deprived lack something on the list? And shouldn’t the non-deprived lack nothing on the list?

    In the framework of my presumption above, don’t the results of using the metric invalidate the metric?

    If not, then you can be unable to get unnecessary things and be defined as deprived, which is a new definition of deprived to me.

    Reply
  • I do not consider my children deprived. Yes, maybe they do not get as much as their friends get but every day when they get in from school they have a dinner, supper and have a roof over their heads. They always have food in the house and when the weather is cold they have heat. Yes, when they were younger we took them away on Supervalu breaks around the country because it was the cheap way to do it….under 200 euro for 3 nights with kids under 10 free but now that they are teenagers it would be too expensive to go most places with them. Instead we try to have an odd day out during the summer hols, and have their friends over when we can. I agree that people do need to come together and help each other out…numerous times I have given clothes to people I knew and they were never offended. Also I have taken clothes from people. Bartering is great during a recession…I often bake and give some items away and in return I am often given free range eggs !! Kids can barter too,,,,they can swop books, magazines, toys etc…and what about clothes swop evenings for teenagers? They would get to have some fun trying on clothes and would save money into the bargain. I know there are children who are hungry at bedtime in this country…we should all keep our eyes open for children who are under nourished or wanting in any way and try to help if we can…I won a years supply of Crunchy nut cornflakes a few weeks ago and wanted to donate them to St. Vincent De Paul….it took weeks for them to approve my donation of cereals…..why was this? Crazy , especially when they are saying they need items for needy families…Thank God I got approval today and they will be sent to my local SVP shop for distribution.

    Reply
    • From my experience of St. Vincent de Paul the only people they seem to give assistance to are those that need the money for cigarettes, alcohol & drugs. The crunchy nut cornflakes I’d imagine wouldn’t go down too well with a hangover. They’ll probably end up feeding them to the swans or something.

      Reply
  • oh, i never felt deprived…but we were charity cases in school and got subsidised schooling.
    i never felt hard done by or deprived.
    i was never asked either did i feel so!

    Reply
  • Those are the basic necessities not for survival but for a child to be well rounded and to have the skills they needed, such as being able to save money, have socail skills, be able to go to the shop and back.

    Reply
    • Disagree entirely.
      It weakens the whole study and the trustworthiness of both associated organizations to call that a “basic” list.
      Barnardos are doing a dis-service to children with a report like that. There are many kids who lack actual “basics” such as food.
      While somethings on the list are nice – perhaps even relatively important – it is quite disgusting to be putting kids that lack food & warmth into the same category as those lacking a holiday and a bank account. Shameful really.

      Reply
  • extraordinary change in life and times for sure!
    if this is the case i would be classified as severely deprived!
    but coming up to age 59yrs old, i went to the most expensive school in ireland and had NONE of the above twelve key indicators of poverty.. NONE!

    Reply

Add New Comment