TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Clare Daly abortion bill defeated by 101 votes to 27

The bill was put forward by Deputy Clare Daly, following a bill that was rejected in April.

AN ABORTION BILL put forward by Deputy Clare Daly has been voted down by 101 votes to 27 in the Dáil this evening.

Today saw the second evening of debate on the Medical Treatment (Termination of Pregnancy in Case of Risk to Life of Pregnant Woman) Bill. Yesterday, a number of TDs used the debate as an opportunity to hit out at the leak of the Expert Group report on abortion at the weekend.

The bill was for legislating for the X Case, and the full details of the bill can be accessed by clicking here.

It would have provided an interim legislative arrangement as required by the Council of Europe, for termination of pregnancy where as a matter of probability a real and substantial risk to the life of the pregnant woman exists.

It also would have made provision for the prevention of any curtailment, hindrance or preclusion of such treatment that may arise as a result of the pregnancy of the woman.

Scurrilous

This evening, United Left Alliance Deputy Daly said it was “scurrilous” that the Dáil was back voting on such a bill, and said she was disappointed by the reaction of the Government on the issue. She said that she took offence at claims from Fine Gael and Labour that those for the bill were being divisive, and said that Irish people have moved on on the issue of abortion.

Deputy Daly also said that descriptions of “walk in, walk out” abortions were “an insult to women and doctors”. She received a round of applause after she concluded her closing speech before the TDs voted on the issue.

Sinn Féin deputy leader Mary Lou McDonald said:

We take this position because we recognise the urgency of legislating to give legal protection and clarity to pregnant women and their doctors. We take this position because the inertia and negligence of successive governments on this issue – a basic issue of protecting pregnant women’s lives – must be ended.

Minister of State for Primary care in the Department of Health Alex White said that Irish abortion laws “are unduly restrictive on women” and the constitution should be revisited on this issue. Fine Gael Deputy Jerry Buttimer said that he was born of a crisis pregnancy, but thankfully survived. He said that what they need to do is legislate to end the uncertainty, and to give a sense of confidence to the medical profession and women of Ireland.

“Let us park our political differences,” he said. “This is far too important.”

Labour Deputy Aodhán Ó Riordán said that his party have “stood alone the platform” on the abortion issue, and so have received vulgar letters, abusive phonecalls and had their family members targeted by people who opposed their views. He also accused candidates from other parties of playing dirty tricks and scaremongering on the issue.

“We have no difficulty with this when we know that we are right,” he said.

TDs who opposed the bill included Independent Deputy Mattie McGrath, who said that he felt that the pro-choice side had used the recent Savita Halappanavar case as leverage for them before the full facts of the case are known. He said he was worried the Government has “bought into this deception”.

Also opposing it was Fine Gael Deputy Regina Doherty, who said that she wanted to allow for time and space for the government to come to a consensus on the issue. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett, by comparison, supported the bill and said that some discussions around the issue of abortion had been “obnoxious and medieval”, particularly around the issue of suicide and pregnancy.

Independent Deputy John Halligan spoke of the number of abortion pills that have been seized by customs, and said it is “tragic and appalling that women are reduced to this”.

Health Minister Dr James Reilly appealed to the members of the Dáil to participate in the Dáil debates that have been planned over the next couple of weeks following the recent release of the Expert Group report into the A, B, C case. He said that it is his earnest hope that “this time we can reach party consensus” on the issue of legislating for the X Case.

Deputy Mick Wallace said that “for too long women who had abortions or advocated for reproductive rights have been stigmatised, shamed and silenced” in Ireland. He supported the bill.

Read: Daly abortion bill: How each TD voted>

http://www.thejournal.ie/clare-daly-x-case-bill-dail-691741-Nov2012/

Read next:

Comments (87 Comments)

  • “Allow for time”???? YOU’VE HAD 20 YEARS!

    Reply
    • People elected that pig with lipstick in a poke.

      You will NEVER remove the corrupt parasites from power and stop unconstitutional inevitably catastrophic practices just by the using the ballot box that they stuff with votes purchased with your earnings. You are going to have to get dirty if you want to fix this mess. This is a social, economic, political and governmental cancer – ending it requires surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy – not wishful thinking, placebo meds, and “let’s wait and see what happens” therapy.

      Reply
  • I honestly do not believe that these people are intelligent enough to run the country.

    Reply
  • 101 + 27 = 128
    166 – 128 = 38
    Allowing for the Ceann Comharile that’s 37 highly paid public representatives unaccounted for. The dail is a joke.

    Reply
  • Jess 28/11/12 #

    This country is slowly strangling us all. What on earth is wrong with everything.

    Reply
    • People gave too much power to the conservatives (FG & FF). Now women’s rights are stifled by these same neo-cons in power. A lesson needs to be learned by the voters next time…

      Everyone needs to grab a conservative and throw them of a cliff. This will solve two problems. We will help the conservatives to reduce their carbon foot print to “0″ and we will also be rid of them !

      Reply
    • So Joe the looney left is now advocating the murder of conservatives for holding a different opinion to your crew? Suppose it makes a change from wanting innocent babies murdered.

      Reply
    • Michael 29/11/12 #

      Hey Joe, this ain’t the USA

      Reply
    • Conservatives = Retards

      re·tard 1 (r-tärd)
      v. re·tard·ed, re·tard·ing, re·tards
      v.tr.
      To cause to move or proceed slowly; delay or impede.
      v.intr.
      To be delayed.
      n.
      1. A slowing down or hindering of progress; a delay.

      Reply
  • So another 4,000 women in this country are now faced with travelling to the UK next year for terminations without any proper back up or follow up care ! Keep ignoring this figure and hope it goes away ! An Irish Solution to an Irish problem !

    Reply
    • Terrible Mary. Its shameful we cant look after our own citizens in this country. We really are an export country. We even export our reponsibilities. We need to mature as a nation. I have 2 daughters & this lack of maturity makes me concerned about their future.

      Reply
    • So Mary if the legislation had been voted in would all 4,000 of those women been able to abort their babies here? I don’t think so because their lives obviously weren’t at risk, they were traveling to avail of abortion on demand because the child they were carrying was an inconvenience.

      Reply
    • It must be great Oracle to be so sure of your facts. Do you know what a non viable pregnancy is? Do you think couples who find out that their wished for baby has a huge defect and will not live beyond birth or may die in the womb should be forced to go full term or should they be allowed the option to terminate or abort (if you prefer that term) in their own country? Sweeping statement to claim all 4000 who travelled to England did so because being pregnant “was an inconvenience” unless you have access to all 4000 medical notes on the possible outcomes for the foetus, which I doubt.

      Reply
  • Every labour td hang your head in shame you have betrayed the women of Ireland explain ivana how you can stay in this excuse of a party

    Reply
  • There’s conservatism and there’s Irish government conservatism. Catholic guilt is alive and well.

    Reply
    • Catholic control over the masses, fear is a stick to keep the sheep in their place!! it will take the next generation to make the changes which allows Ireland to be part of the World in which most of us live.
      the people of Ireland should never ever give up fighting for their rights.
      I love my country but at times I find it hard to understand.

      Reply
    • People don’t love this country anymore. Kenny has made sure of that. Time to riot.

      Reply
    • My the kick the Catholic Church brigade are having a ball,the pro-abortionists got a kick in the nuts and about time,calling for the death sentence of the unborn. Strange that some living folk can not see the the unborn have THEIR rights to a life. Do any of them cry tears for the thousands of women in India who die every year in dirty hospitals! i doubt not. Stranger that these lefties are always crying equal rights but prepared to deny the unborn theirs.

      Reply
  • Well it will be put through as legislation in a few months .

    Reply
  • shame on them all!

    Reply
  • I just left the protest outside the Dail a few minutes ago and feel upbeat that the process of change for the better is now starting.

    The vast majority of abortions are due to desperation. It’s facile and lazy to proscribe abortion in Ireland without addressing the reality of the causes of the desperate need to avail of abortion. The factors causing the need for abortion are increasing in severity. We hear nothing from the anti-choice lobby about addressing the underlying factors such as poverty, financial pressure, lack of social support, anti child policies and similar factors.

    The safety valve from bad and pernicious law allowed by travel to the UK and the Netherlands for abortion is not always available.

    Reply
  • Bunch of hypocritical old boys running the country, fair play to Clare daly at least she’s trying, all those who voted against should be named and asked to give their reasons

    Reply
  • Clearly the majority of our TDs don’t care enough about the lives of women who are pregnant today to act swiftly and decisively. Could this be because the majority of TDs are men?

    Would a majority of female TDs have acted differently?

    Waiting for expert reports and more debate implies that the lives of women who are pregnant today, are not as important as they may be (but aren’t guaranteed to be) tomorrow.

    Reply
  • I think we will always have the choice between (male) chimps and orangutans as long as our political environment is as patriarcal as everything else in Ireland. Minimal representation, from people who arent conservative middleaged males from a narrow group of particular professions with housewives at home. The vast majority of Irelands population are not represented by these men. Is it any wonder that childrens and womens issues have been sidelined and ditched by every government? Gender quotas now please, lets have more diverse men and women and triple the effective real candidate pool.

    @ Oracle So a woman has to give her body without choice to an unborn even if she does not wish to be pregnant..(and even if she did not give consent to being impregnated)? Otherwise she will be guilty of a felony…

    There are millions of born infants dying weekly in this world Oracle. When did you try and save one? When did you try and change the plight of the 100,000 of thousands of ghettoised childhoods in Ireland? Have you even stopped to consider these children?..If the plight of the unborn is so vital to you
    then surely you would also dedicate your efforts to saving the millions of innocent born children who have no protector? NO???? I thought not.

    Then please stop forcing women to use their bodies without choice for something that you are not willing to do with a full choice for born humans.

    Reply
  • I don’t get why this has to be so complicated. I’m not saying that abortion should be readily available when people decide that they just don’t want the kid, but if the mother’s life is at risk then surely the unborn’s life is too??? If the mother dies the unborn dies too? So how is it a better choice to lose both of them? those useless idiots are so scared of taking a stand in the debate they can’t even see that by protecting the life of the mother you might have a chance of protecting the life of the unborn too. spineless dopes

    Reply
  • Denis 29/11/12 #

    Nice publicity stunt by Clare I suppose.
    Had to get it in quick before the government introduce their legislation based on the expert report.
    I think I’d prefer something based on the expert report rather than what Mick and Clare came up with in bed some evening.

    Reply
  • Cowards!!

    Reply
  • Let me get this straight;

    Ireland is a democratic country, yet, when the majority of residents go out and protest passionately on a matter, take to the streets, their opinion counts for nought when legislation is passed?? I presume 101 Dáil members are devout Catholics, because I can’t find any other explaination for the outcome. Wow, when you think about it, the catholic church really did ruined this great country

    Reply
    • Democratic country my a**e.
      We only get to exercise democracy during elections and referendum and even then we’re asked to vote for the most appealing liar.
      Once we “democratically” elect these superstitious old men our involvement is finished, they become immune to scrutiny, answerable to no-one and we become invisible.

      Reply
    • What has devout Catholic got to do with it Veronica? in these strange days the vast majority of people still value the life of the unborn. As for the Catholic Church ruining this great country i find this comment very strange, when our English masters denied us education it was the Church who provided education. Coming from up North i find some of these remarks very childish ,come in to the 21st century and fight for all rights especially the unborn.

      Reply
  • I for one think that it’s a good thing that this wasn’t passed. This was a divisive bill put forward at a particular time to try and take advantage of the unresolved fears and media attention with very little actual facts known. Making laws based on exceptions is not how a country should be run. Trying to scare the public into supporting a position where abortion on a broad scale is available in Ireland based on a case, which was no doubt tragic, but on which very little of the surrounding facts are known, is a pretty vulgar move by the Pro Choice argument. The fact that most other western countries allow abortion is by no means a measure of how we should legislate. There is no evidence that a termination in the most recent case would have saved the mother. There is a constant attempt by the Pro Choice argument to try and simplify this debate by using circumstances where the mother has been the victim of sexual assault, claims to be suicidal or is hypothetically in danger of dying herself. These are certainly all tragic events, in which the State has an obligation to protect and provide an ethical means for the resolution of such, but to lobby for free and unencumbered abortion based on these instances is highly simplistic. Detailed and well thought out procedures for such cases, to establish the reality and determine the best case scenario for both mother and child need to be put in place. It needs to be done properly, not just a knee jerk reaction to quell public upset.

    Reply
    • I know my comment won’t be popular, but I do feel that if we need to step back and all try and really educate ourselves on the surrounding facts. It isn’t a simple topic, and all the information in the media recently has been very emotive and has largely come from family members as opposed to medical professionals. I also feel that the idea of pro choice is very valuable, but the current “pro-choice” argument ignores the choice of the unborn child. There is no medical certainty on when the fetus actually becomes sentient, so the state does have an obligation to protect the rights of those who do not have a voice. If we can prove that before a certain stage of development, beyond doubt, the fetus has no ability to experience pain, or anything at all, then perhaps it’s plausible to say that the choice that’s relevant is only the mother’s, but until that stage we cannot have a debate on outright abortion. We have legislation relating to cases where the mother’s life is in danger, and this is all ethical, but the practicalities of this legislation means that medical practitioners feel that it’s too difficult to make a decision to terminate without potentially losing their ability to practice their chosen profession if they have made a minor error in judgement. This is the legislation that needs to be amended. We don’t need anything beyond this. We don’t need anything more. We don’t need to follow the example of the US, UK or otherwise. We just need to make it real and practical.

      Reply
    • Mike El. You’re right, your comment is not popular.

      Reply
    • Should I not express it knowing that it won’t be popular? I’m sure the fact that I’m male and I’m expressing an opinion on this doesn’t help my popularity. :)

      Reply
    • Mike El,
      Perhaps it would interest you to know that the relevant parts of the foetus’ brain to accommodate the processing of pain or to become conscious do not link up until around week 20. Prior to this the foetus is neither sentient nor able to feel pain.

      Reply
    • Read them both and don’t assume I am anti abortion I just hate people who Jump into a conversation with complete tripe. Read the facts.

      Reply
    • Maybe you should read that one yourself

      Reply
    • I guess the point I’m making is that there’s no real proof either way as to when the being becomes sentient. There are medical opinions based on empirical observations from a limited perspective. If we chose to gather enough opinion for one side or the other and then legislate based on medical opinion and no real knowledge, then we are only really weighing up opinion based on which side we prefer as opposed to really wanting to know what the reality truly is. If this is what people want in society, no doubt this is what will come about, but I think I would prefer to live in a society where we make decisions based on the truth of the matter and until we really know the truth of the matter, ie when sentience occurs, it would be humane to air on the side of caution. That’s just my opinion though, and I’m just one person.

      Reply
    • @ Mike El the original bill as put forward by Daly was last April so considering the “exception” as you call it was not even pregnant at that time I’d say you have the wrong end of the stick. Consider this if Daly’s bill had been passed in April none of us would have heard of the “exception”…..

      Reply
    • You’re right Dee, that paper concluded that the pathways were not formed until later than I stated, they were putting forth 23-26 weeks. They also argued that the true experience of “pain” might not truly exist until after birth.. I got my numbers mixed up, but I did put it at an earlier point (out of regard for the one baby delivered at 21.5weeks that survived, albeit with a LOT of help).

      Reply
    • Mike El 29/11/12 #

      I’m sorry, I don’t follow. Could you expand?

      Reply
    • Mike El 29/11/12 #

      @ Kerry. Sorry Kerry, that was directed at you. I’m not sure I follow your point? I don’t disagree with legislation being refined to make it more practical for doctors etc, so that things like this are prevented, if possible. I’m not sure this bill was actually proposing this. That said, I have not read the details of the bills. I am assuming that it was not passed as the proposed legislation was not prepared in conjunction with all the various stakeholders, ie no attempt was made to involve all parties in the formulation of such. It being voted against was no doubt a political move in some instances to allow the ruling party to have more control over the content of such, which believe it or not, is actually their obligation as they have a mandate from us the people. Of course, this is just speculation on my behalf, and we are really getting into the realm of conjecture and assumption, as we don’t actually know the facts of the most recent case.

      Reply
  • that shame you are wishing on people Collette, people ?, which people are they ? the people who take control of the life they lead and who do not need a Church to tell them what is right or wrong ?
    as I don’t believe in hell or heaven for that matter or judgement from a higher power , I am happy to live an independent life and take responsibility for my own action.
    and if that were to mean not bringing a child into a world of poverty or bringing a child into a loveless relationship then I would abort.
    so Collette what have you to say to an independent woman who has the mental ability to think her way through a problem? (ps. I do have 4 children )

    Reply
  • This government is an absolute disgrace to humanity. On the one hand they do not give a woman the right to terminate a pregnancy and on the other hand if she gives birth to a child with special needs they refuse to give the child its legal rights to a decent health service, an education. People with disabilities are treated as an unwanted burden in this country. Their families are left in a situation where they have had to fight even for the most basic of services. THIS COUNTRY IS A DISGUSTING MESS AND IT IS FULL OF SPINELESS IDIOTS WHO ARE AFRAID OF THE POPE

    Reply
  • @Martin G – you can’t get pregnant. No matter how bigotted, narrow minded and forceful your misogynistic opinions are that fact will never change. This debate would be much healthier if it was limited to female participation, in which case we probably wouldn’t be having a debate now, we’d be too busy putting change into action.

    Reply
  • Re-election please, NOW!!!!!!

    Reply
  • padraig 30/11/12 #

    Pink Shirt’s girlfriend cannot be a credible source for resolving the lack of X Case legislation.

    Reply
  • Rabble rabble shock horror outrage [and such...]

    Reply
  • “Let us park our political differences,” he said. – and take a purely religious standpoint. pfffff!

    Reply
  • Hope the rest of the votes go this way. Let the silent majority have their say.

    Reply
  • What a sad bunch of people the Irish are becoming,some people here like Shanti throwing figures about the unborn baby like it has no human value, does not matter what stage the baby has got to it is still a human being at the mercy of its mothers protection. Abortion is an evil act the deliberate taking of a fellow human being. Again the Living trying their best to destroy the life of the unborn.

    Reply
  • Well done on voting No

    Reply
  • Delighted.

    Reply
  • Go down to your Local TD, demand answers and give them an earful! You’ll get nowhere, on here!

    Reply
  • this is a very serious matter what I would like to know is what happens when we come to the end of the alphabet we have A, B, C, and now we are on to X where from here.

    Reply

Add New Comment