TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Ecstasy could be legalised, suggests top Canadian health official

Perry Kendall is not calling for the drug’s legalisation but believes a review of drug policies is merited.

File photo
File photo
Image: Paul Faith/PA Wire/Press Association Images

A TOP CANADIAN public health officer says pure ecstasy can be safe and regulated sales of the drug – similar to alcohol – would be more effective than efforts to control it as a criminal substance.

But Perry Kendall, chief health officer for British Columbia, denied earlier reports that he is calling for legalisation and government sales of ecstasy also known as MDMA. Rather he wants an evidence-based review of all drug policies.

“My position has long been that prohibition and criminalisation is not an effective way of reducing the harms of illicit drugs, keeping them off the streets, or keeping them out of the hands of vulnerable populations.”

Scores of recent deaths linked to ecstasy –  84 young people died in British Columbia alone since 2008  - are due to contamination or overdose, he told AFP on Thursday.

But medical research on hundreds of patients treated with MDMA has proved “that a pharmaceutical-produced drug, in the appropriate dosage (and) setting can be safe,” he said.

Black-market sales of illegal drugs puts “billions of dollars in the hands of criminal gangs” and exhausts police resources, he said.

Most countries ban ecstasy, and most North American police forces have a zero-tolerance policy to the drug.

But governments should examine policies to reduce drug use through regulation, which would have the benefit of making illegal manufacture and sale unprofitable, said Kendall.

Stressing that he was speaking hypothetically, he said that as with alcohol sales controls would be needed, such as “access through government-licensed stores, pharmacies, or by prescription.”

“Designer drugs that are currently on the street have absolutely unknown purity and quantity, and they can be associated with overdose deaths,” said Kendall.

- (c) AFP, 2012

Read: Cigarettes and alcohol: less experimenting, more abstinence by Irish teens

Read: Taking new illicit drugs is like playing ‘a dangerous game of roulette’

Read next:

Comments (31 Comments)

  • Ah Mitsubishi s those were the days …nLMAO

    Reply
  • Great drug when it’s clean. Everybody should try it once to give their head a bit of perspective.

    Reply
  • Give me 10 of them and a big splif for the come down

    Reply
  • MDMA is scientifically proven to be less harmful to the human body than alcohol. Society has to accept truths and adjust to the legalization of substances that are less harmful than those legal now. I would also point to cannabis verus tobacco. If you’re talking about health risks with controlled substances, the wrong ones are legal.

    Reply
  • In my opinion no drugs should be illegal. The war on drugs is a failed system and it is handing criminals a lucrative business, where there is absolutely no regulation.

    Reply
    • mart_n 14/06/12 #

      It’d be a tough job to legalise them all outright. Not everyone is going to abide by regulations. If one source is providing a drug for €5 with a 50% tax on top of it, another source will be pedaling the same thing for €7 with no tax.

      It’s way too simplistic a solution. You need to start with decriminalisation of the possession of small amounts and work up from there. No immediate & massive changes need to be made in order to usher in the societal acceptance of a drugs culture.

      Reply
    • Oh I agree with you mart. Look at Portugal for example, they have started on the road that you have suggested.

      Reply
    • The war on drugs is a complete failure, but different nationalities have different tendencies and I fear an end to prohibition wouldn’t work very well here. We don’t have a problem with alcohol in this country, we have an unchecked issue with depression that manifests itself through drink. If currently illegal narcotics were to become legal tomorrow we would not be able to handle it. The amount of people who would start taking them simply because it has the term legal on it would be ridiculous( head shops proved this )The government makes a whole fuss about controlling substances, it’s a statement that sounds great but utterly futile. For once Let’s deal with the nature of addiction and not immediately blame the substance!

      Reply
    • Jonno 15/06/12 #

      Meth?!

      Reply
  • Mdma good……….alcohol bad

    Reply
  • Took loads in the eighties still waiting for the after affects , nn

    Reply
  • Id prefer to be in the company of somebody on e than in the company of somebody who is drunk anyday.

    Reply
  • As far as I know it use to prescribed in America. Well it’s main component

    Reply
  • Good to see they’re considering taking a different approach, the so called War on Drugs is a failed policy, prohibition clearly doesn’t work. MDMA is a relatively safe drug if it’s not contaminated and is used properly, legalizing it would make it much safer to use and would stop the criminal underworld from profiting from the sale of it.

    Reply
  • Potentially dangerous substances like Alcohol and MDMA need to be regulated to prevent children accessing them before they are old enough to handle them.
    Apart from that, I don’t believe any government should be in the business of telling its citizens what substances they cannot consume.
    My guess is that future generations will look at our current prohibition and criminalization of drug use in amusement and astonishment.

    Reply
  • Anybody else feel the tingle just from reading this article?

    Reply
  • if drugs were legal problem wouldn’t make much of a difference

    Reply
    • Jonno 15/06/12 #

      Well they could be regulated to make them safer, generate revenue for the state, create jobs in manufacturing, result in less drug related deaths/crime, take money away from gangster, foster an empathetic free thinking community. But……

      Reply
  • elaine 15/06/12 #

    Did somebody seriously just call for a “social acceptance of drug culture” it baffles me as to how uneducated people remain about the psychological effects all drugs have including cannabis. It is astonishing to see so many self professed “users” on here who actually believe their own waffle. 

    Reply
    • Elaine, people understand the dangers of using drugs, but they still proceed to use them, the fact that they’re illegal makes no difference, in fact some argue that putting them on the banned list, only makes people want to do them all the more (wanting what you’re not allowed have). Prohibition only drives the market underground, making the drugs more dangerous to use (criminals will contaminatie drugs to make them more profitable), whilst lining the pockets of drug lords, which sadly goes on to fund other criminal activities (firearms, prostitution etc.). Legalisation & regulation is is all about harm reduction and taking the market away from the criminal underworld, don’t think for one minute that keeping drugs illlegal is going to make them go away, it’s just not going to happen.

      Reply
  • the problem here in Canada is one of miss-managed law enforcement resourses, lax sentencing for dealers, smugglers & producers, and a lack of political will to make changes to the judicial system beyond (currently) putting in legislation to impise mandatory minimum sentences for serious crime. to which the political and social left cry foul over.

    in Canada, up until recently you received 2x credit for time served awaiting trial. and judges continue to find every reason in the book to give either a lenient sentence, or no jail time at all for such offenders.

    worse yet, we have a penal system that for many the career criminal, is a better life than those outside of prison living off social welfare.

    a person sentenced to prison in Canada is subject (unless deemed a “dangerous” offender) to be allowed automatic early parle after serving 2/3 of their sentence. another 1/3 off is available under the guise of “good behaviour”. so an 8 year sentence for manslaugjtet, you could be out after less than 3 years. minus credit for time served.

    in Canada, it seems that crime does pay.

    Reply
  • elaine 15/06/12 #

    Brian I don’t disagree with you the fight against drugs is at present ineffective and really going nowhere but I believe this is due to a lack of education and resources to help those who are already in the viscous circle of substance misuse. Legalising these drugs no matter what legislation or restrictions would be attached just makes them more readily accessible to those who beforehand may never have considered taking an illegal substance. The criminal aspect of substance misuse is a huge problem that is not going to disappear in the immediate or even distant future but legalising a certain drug will not eliminate this problem!

    Reply
  • Utterly bullcrap

    Reply
  • elaine 15/06/12 #

    No

    Reply

Add New Comment