TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Galway mother jailed for cruelty and neglect

Judge Raymond Groarke described the abuse inflicted upon the eight children as a “human tragedy”.

Image: Clara Molden/PA Archive/Press Association Images

A GALWAY WOMAN has been sentenced to 24 years in prison, with the final 16 suspended, for the cruel and neglectful treatment of eight of her children.

The 47-year-old, who cannot be named in order to protect her children’s identities, pleaded guilty at Galway Circuit Criminal Court to eight sample charges concerning the ill-treatment and neglect of two sons and six daughters between 2002 to 2009, RTÉ reports.

Judge Raymond Groarke described what had occurred as a “human tragedy” and a “monstrosity”, TV3 reports. The court heard how the children had been beaten with hammers, frying pans, whips, sticks and vice grips.

Detective Garda Kieran McNamara told the court that the children were beaten, deprived of food and education and sent out to beg so that their mother could buy alcohol and cigarettes, according to Newstalk.ie.

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • I just can’t comprehend how anyone can treat innocent children in this manner, I only hope they are being well looked after now!

    Reply
    • Aaron 14/07/11 #

      I can’t comprehend why anyone who could do this would have 16 years of their sentence suspended. Irish justice at it’s best!

      Reply
    • Dvonne 14/07/11 #

      That’s a pretty heavy sentence as they go actually. Now tell me, which other country do you reckon protects kids better in terms of sentencing individuals for neglect?

      Reply
    • Aaron 14/07/11 #

      A heavy sentence compared to what exactly? The other light sentences that are handed out on a daily basis in this country? If someone is given a 24 year sentence then that’s what they should serve. Get rid of this suspended sentence bullish*it.

      Reply
    • Dvonne 14/07/11 #

      The Judge wanted her to serve 8 years and wanted a serious deterrent to future offending so added a suspended portion of 16 years. If ‘bulls**t’ suspended sentences were done away with she’d be serving 8 years and that’d be it.

      Reply
    • At least the Judge sent her down, albeit with suspended 16 years. My children grew up knowing there was a man living 50 yards away who had pleaded guilty to posession of 11,500 graphic pornographic images of children on his computers: his sentence – a TOTAL of 2 years suspended. How many children were damaged for life for him to get his jollies?

      Add to your hopes that this woman’s children are now being well-cared for and get all the help and support they will need to get over this.

      Reply
    • Aaron 14/07/11 #

      A 16 year suspended sentence isn’t a serious deterrent! The chance of getting a 24 year prison sentence is a serious deterrent for anyone doing this in the future.

      Reply
    • Dvonne 15/07/11 #

      The suspended portion is a serious deterrent to HER reoffending. You do understand that suspended means that if you break the conditions on which it is suspended you go to jail to serve the full thing?

      Reply
  • Oh the poor kids I hope that they can recover from this, though it sounds so bad that will be very very difficult!

    Reply
  • Disgraceful. Pertinent comment by judge about how this could go on for so long without intervention. Where were social services?

    Reply
  • Eight of her kids? How many does she have in total?

    Reply
  • Horrific. I hope for a peaceful life for those kids and despair for the ‘help’ they’ll get from the ‘system’ in the years to come.

    Reply
  • 24 years is a good sentence , but why suspend 16 ?? Why do judges do this . Give out a sentence and then make it better by suspending two thirds of it . That is why people ( Criminals ) feel they can do what they like . We are a nation of apologists , and are being blackguarded left right and centre . This woman , she does not deserve the name Mother, should be made do the full 24 years .

    Reply
  • SMcB 15/07/11 #

    What’s shocking about all this is that the abuse carried on for 7 years before anything was done. Clearly a lot of people turned a blind eye during that time. Shame on them.

    Reply
  • i wonder what kind of chilhood she had herself? maybe her own kids might run into trouble without the proper help they’re gonna need. If u want longer custody we can stop the underfunded community supports to build and keep prisons. And sure we’d all be back to work. Win/Win. :-(

    Reply
  • chrissy 14/07/11 #

    I can’t get my head around this. Unbelievable. I don’t understand 24 years but with 16 suspended ???? anybody want to enlighten me !!

    Reply
  • So what was the point of saying 24 years why didnt he just say 8 ?
    Mind you even 24 years is no long enough for someone who can treat another human so bad
    Poor kids :-(

    Reply
  • this is the first and won’t be the last let’s see more of these parasites been locked up. they live of social welfare money now we need to take a stance and them using our hard earned money.
    no wonder the country is on its knees with people like this, a disgrace and a mockery of the system that is in place. the justice is been to soft on her 24yrs and 16 suspendedc that’s a joke. give 30 and leave it at that. I’m very sure her children will be well look after.

    Reply
  • I can believe that poor spelling is hampering sales. After all, if someone spells an item incorrectly and the search result returns that no such item is available, then the customer may look elsewhere, blissfully unaware of their mistake.

    Reply

Add New Comment