TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Government gets an E grade for treatment of Traveller children

The Children’s Rights Alliance’s annual Report Card notes that Traveller children are “almost universally worse” than their settled peers.

IN A NEW report out today, the Children’s Rights Alliance has awarded the Government an ‘E’ grade for its “unsatisfactory” performance on the issues affecting Traveller children.

In its annual Report Card, the CRA notes that Traveller children are “almost universally worse” than their settled peers and they live in conditions that are far below the minimum required for healthy child development.

The Report Card also highlights the government’s particularly poor performance with regard to Traveller children and education. It found, on average Travellers finish full-time education 4.7 years earlier than those in the general population and the percentage of Travellers with no formal education in 2011 was 17.7 per cent, compared with 1.4 per cent in the general population.

Martin Collins of Pavee Point said it was shocking that in this day and age Traveller children continue to face these levels of inequality.

The disproportionate cuts to Traveller education will only serve to reinforce and condemn another generation of young Travellers to exclusion and marginalisation.

We are calling on the government to urgently outline what steps it will take to support and protect the rights of Traveller children rather than furthering inequalities. The government must ensure that every child can enjoy all their rights equally.

According to Census 2011, there are 14,245 Traveller children in Ireland, an increase of 30 per cent on the 2006 Census figures. Travellers have a very young population with 42 per cent of Travellers under 15 years of age, compared with 21 per cent of the general population.

Overall, the Government has been given a ‘C Grade’ for it’s treatment of children– a slight drop from its C+ last year.

The full report will be available on the Alliance website today.

Read: Government awarded overall C grade in 2013 report card >

Read next:

Comments (62 Comments)

  • ” the CRA notes that Traveller children are “almost universally worse” than their settled peers and they live in conditions that are far below the minimum required for healthy child development.”

    Traveller children are entitled to the exact same benefits as any other child. It’s their parents that choose to live on halting sites. The fact tat they leave education 4.7 years on average reflects more on the parents of the children, than of the state.

    I’m all in favour of travellers have better living conditions, and higher penetration into education – But surely, the state can only do so much. Parental responsibility is even more important. Parents should encourage their children to complete school, and move onto third level education.

    I’m not having a go at the traveller movement – I know many fine travellers, who are genuinely nice people. But there is a problem within their community with respect to how education is viewed. That needs to change. You can only blame the state (for all it’s faults) for so much.

    Reply
    • “Parental responsibility is even more important. Parents should encourage their children to complete school, and move onto third level education.”

      I agree. But it shouldn’t just be Travellers that this encouragement be given to. There is a far greater population of delinquent non-Traveller families whose offspring are responsible for far more crime and social welfare spending than Travellers. Surely we should target them first than single out Travellers?

      Reply
    • Do they choose to live in halting sites?, what about the family that were burned out to stop them moving in …..they are criticised for living in halting site, criticised for living in houses ….
      do we really want to house Travellers in Nazis style camps in the hills of Donegal?

      Reply
    • “Surely we should target them first than single out Travellers?”

      I’m not singling out anyone. The article makes reference to travellers, I’m responding to the context of the article.

      “Do they choose to live in halting sites?”

      Yes.

      “what about the family that were burned out to stop them moving in”

      I think you’ll find that this is a very rare occurrence, and isn’t limited to travellers. It happens to many people in the settled community also. Either act should be obviously condemned, but this is a red herring and completely deflects from the issue at hand.

      You’re completely missing the point – and I think it’s one that most people have acknowledged. The state is not responsible for young travellers leaving school 4.7 years on average in contrast to other children. That is the responsibility of their parents, and I think people are getting tired of parents not stepping up and accepting responsibility for failing their children.

      Reply
    • Does every group and body in this country expect the state to mammy them from the cradle to the grave?
      The state provides plenty to all but there has to be some responsibility on the part of the parents.
      Every rights group in this country would want to wake up to the reality of the situation and stop demanding rubbish like this.

      Reply
    • Children’s rights alliance, would youse ever have a go at the parents before you start mouthing off against the state, you pick the easy target, are you afraid of getting a brick through your window or your car keyed or torched by the real culprits?

      Reply
  • Not that I’m taking sides with the government here but are traveller parents going to take any responsibility for their children not finishing school?

    Reply
    • If i don’t send my kids to school for more than 20 days I’ve someone knocking on the door threatening me with court. Why isn’t it the same for a traveller family

      Reply
    • That Martin Collins talks some amount of shite. He never apologies to the victims of travellers crime, the elderly people they rip off on a daily basis. Let him answer me this, where do they get the money for their brand new vans and their big fat gypsy weddings? Answer me that Martin? People aren’t stupid, let them stop moaning and make some contribution to outlet struggling economy.

      Reply
    • Because they would beat the living daylights out of you if you went in demanding they do something they don’t want to, regular things such as paying tax, bin charges, not littering, water charges, property tax and minor things such as ensuring their children attend school.

      Reply
  • Send the kids to school, do everything you can to provide a good home.
    Are some parents missing this, if so they need a wake up call.
    Doesn’t matter if their house has wheels or not.

    Reply
    • Traveller children collected for, and brought back from school by the State. Are “settled” children and their parents awarded this privilege? Is that not a form of reverse discrimination in itself?

      Reply
  • Is there a grade for our special needs children??

    Reply
  • CABK 18/02/13 #

    Two girls in my school from a traveller family were taken out at 15 to be married and pregnant fairly shortly afterwards. No doubt if the government tried to stop this awful part of their culture then we would also see a statement from pavee point talking about how terrible it was the government were stamping on the culture of these ethnic people. You can’t win.

    Reply
  • Oh Jesus no, not again….

    Reply
  • More horseshít from Pavee Point and their stoogie Spokesman Martin Collins. Traveller children in fact have more rights enshrining their equal access to education than settled children, as it is unlawful to discriminate against a traveller child’s right to attend a school on the basis of them being a traveller, but this is not so for a settled child. When that equal access to education is afforded to them, they crank and moan about it because like everything else with them, they want special treatment as travellers and appear to want a special travelling school laid on for them, that follows them around the country.

    When it comes to travellers facing up to their responsibilities and putting their children through the same educational system that the rest of us have to use, I’d be giving them an NG (no grade).

    Reply
    • JayK 18/02/13 #

      ” … it is unlawful to discriminate against a traveller child’s right to attend a school on the basis of them being a traveller, but this is not so for a settled child.”

      So.. it’s not illegal to discriminate against a settled child for being a Traveller?

      What?

      Reply
  • Traveller children are collected for, and brought back from, school by the State.

    When our three (now adult) children were attending no-one offered us a free taxi every day. It was our (rightful) responsibility to get them to and from school.

    People need to take responsibility. And to be honest I am sick of lobby groups blaming everyone except the guilty parties.

    Reply
    • siobeli 18/02/13 #

      Very true, and many of the larger halting sites have on site primary school teachers!! In a north Dublin site, with over 15 families, the teacher often have only 2-3 children attending…parents would not even send their children for an education when it was on their door step!! When the teacher was taken due to the small numbers, there was uproar!!
      No child “wants” to go to school, as parents, we all have regular morning tantrums and stress getting the kids to school!!
      Again it’s the parents that are at fault…but of course it’s part of their culture and their ethinicity!!!!

      Reply
  • Is there a Grade where settled (non traveller) children are treated also ?
    It just seems that the traveling community expect right of way all the time.

    Reply
  • I’d love to know how it’s the State’s fault that traveller children leave school early.

    Reply
  • Education is available to all; if traveller culture dictates that children leave school early that’s their own problem to fix.

    Reply
  • It’s the government’s fault that traveller children don’t have the same education as other children? No it’s their parents fault end of story. Their children can go to school just like every other child in the country. In fact they probably get more help sending their children to school than any other family does. The reason traveller children don’t have the same education as settled children is because their parents don’t make them and, unlike settled parents, won’t be brought to court because that would be ‘discriminating’ against them wouldn’t it? This woe is me bullshit Pavee Point pull every time a report like this comes out sickens me. It’s not the government’s fault or anyone else’s. It’s the traveller community’s fault. If they feel their children they aren’t getting the education they should maybe they should start making them go to school.

    Reply
  • Same old same old, someone else’s fault, like the post above says, grade the parents. “Its in our culture”™.

    Reply
  • JayTee 18/02/13 #

    ‘conditions that are far below the minimum required for healthy child development’…is this not the parents responsibility.

    Reply
  • We should adopt the French system of children’s allowance. They simply pay more for the first 2 children then it stops. So if parents want large families they support them. This is for all of society and it means the children will have a better chance.

    Reply
  • Travellers make up 0.2% of the population. I wonder if you take any other random 0.2% of the settled population and compare say criminal records and taxes paid. Would any of the Pro-traveller supporters wager that the settled group would have lower levels of criminal records and a higher contribution in taxes. It’s never your fault its never your fault always the victim (travellers) it’s never there fault.

    Reply
  • Lamb 18/02/13 #

    I can’t comment on their standard of living. The settled community choose their way of life to avail of ameneties that enable them to have a better standard of living. Travellers choose a different lifestyle. As for education….teachers should make lesson plans orientate towards things that travellers are interested in….can’t get them to do their maths..make it about money or wheeling and dealing and you’ll see a u-turn in their performance. Travellers are clever folk, they’re still around in modern society, that has to say something.

    Reply
  • You can go ha skool or ride da pony?

    Reply
  • There is a top-up payment for A.D.H.D. which most if not all Traveller children qualify for ………… spoke to a teacher and she told me that it’s 280 per month per child ! ………… Apparently it’s their “secret” ……..don’t know how true it is but perhaps someone who can spell better than me could check it out !

    Reply
  • Some of the bigoted comments here are disgusting (nothing new there, though). These are children you’re talking about who have been disproportionality hit by cuts – their not responsible for what their parents decide to do, or not to do.

    Reply
    • siobeli 18/02/13 #

      What about children with special needs, learning difficulties, in families where there is unemployment?? They have all been affected by cuts!!
      Because I’m “settled” do the cuts to education etc not affect my children?

      As you said its the parents fault…no comments here discriminating their children? It’s traveller parents discriminating their own children by not giving them opportunities for a better future.

      Reply
    • The parents must lead by example – or else it’s a never ending cycle of handouts.

      Reply
  • If anyone has any doubt about not only the discrimination against travellers, but the irrational almost blind hatred of them, they need only take a look at this comment boad.

    Reply
  • If anyone has any doubt about not only the discrimination against travellers, but the irrational almost blind hatred of them, they need only take a look at these comments.

    Reply
  • did well to get an E grade,,, when you have ministers like hogan stopping them getting houses,,

    Reply
  • This government stopped the special teachers for the travellers while at the same time handed the banks billions to carry on as normal. The banks took our money and doled it out in sponsorship to all sorts of sporting events and awards for art etc. millions in sponsorship versus a small amount for travellers kids education. That’s our government. Immoral. Cutting special needs to fund sports for the rich and privileged.

    Reply
    • Why should traveller children get special teachers? Where’s the equality in that?

      Reply
    • siobeli 19/02/13 #

      The reason the teachers were taken from the sites is that children didn’t even attend!!!. These teachers were re-deployed to schools where parents made their children go to school!!

      Reply
    • Well said, EU Auditor. But the bigots in this country are quite happy to go along with anything the Big Farmers and Big Business men in government do, as long as they can scapegoat travellers and single mothers. The travellers are the native people of this country, and the bigots came over here with Cromwell and took their land. That is why they hate the travellers. The travellers are a reminder to them that they are the original low lifes from the slums of Englands big cities. May the Lord deliver us from those Evil predators, is all I have to say.

      Reply
    • Patricia, you really should get out more often.

      Reply

Add New Comment