TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Irish Aid requires an external audit system to improve standards – PAC report

The Committee of Public Accounts says Irish Aid’s external audit needs help from more qualified auditors in order to improve standards.

 John McGuinnessT D
John McGuinnessT D
Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

IRISH AID’S SYSTEM of external audit needs help in order to improve standards and provide more comprehensive coverage of the State’s spend, according to a new report by the Committee of Public Accounts (PAC).

A PAC delegation visited Mozambique to examine a number of Irish Aid projects, and concluded that the training of staff involved in financial controls was requited to ensure that certain minimum standards apply.

“The basic problem in Mozambique is the shortage of skilled administrators and skilled auditors as those that are trained can get higher paid jobs in the ever expanding private sector. This has to be addressed especially in the Auditor General’s office where the number of qualified auditors has dropped from 150 to 110,” said Committee Chairman John McGuinness TD.

The Report also references the case in Uganda where Irish aid money was the subject of an elaborate fraud, which saw a total of €12 million of aid funding (€4 million of which was money provided by the Irish taxpayer) diverted to a third party account by senior officials in the office of the Ugandan prime minister.

The Committee was allowed access to an internal report from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on the fraud in Uganda where €4 million of Irish Aid funds was misappropriated, and found that:

  • The Department was open about where it had fallen down and has taken corrective action
  • The audit system in Uganda works: The Auditor General uncovered the fraud and we can take certain assurances from the comprehensive and independent stance taken by the Auditor General to combat fraud
  • The money was paid back
  • The perpetration of the fraud has led to a debate in Uganda about the prevalence of fraud and it should lead to a higher level of intolerance by the State on the issue of fraud as the consequences of not acting are that it could endanger the entire aid budget on which Uganda is so dependant

Deputy McGuinness said there could be “positive outcomes” as a result of the fraud in Uganda, which include highlighting the weaknesses the own system which can be tightened up. “In Mozambique, we need to focus on increasing the capacity of those who are working in the area of financial management and also in the area of audit. Investment in staff training and also staff retention issues must be addressed so that the oversight systems deliver to a standard that we consider acceptable,” he said.

“Finally countries like Mozambique will not remain programme countries forever and we need to look at how best Ireland as a donor nation can help them to move to self-sufficiency,” he concluded.

Read next:

Comments (16 Comments)

  • Look I’m all for charity and people donating. That’s their choice and good on em. But why are our government using borrowed money to act like billy big bollocks. We can’t keep doing this. It’s simple stupid. No other word for it. Simply stupid.

    Reply
  • Brilliant idea, create an expensive state funded body of accountants to audit how we spend money we don’t have in countries where corruption is rife. The Irish government have no mandate to give our money away. I contribute to a third world charity but the government has right to take from Irish people and the services they rely on to pay for war in Africa.

    Reply
    • Our TDs vote for the aid budget every year, and they support it in their election manifestos, and surveys show over 70% of the public supports spending on overseas aid. We live in a republican democracy, TDs vote for the budget through the national budgeting process, that’s a mandate. If you don’t like it, write to your TD, but you’re outnumbered.

      Reply
  • B Lowe 21/03/13 #

    Aid to many countries is non sensical. If we Africa for example.

    It is conservatively estimated that for every $1 Africa receives in Aid, $10 level through corruption(‘Treasure Islands’)

    Just think about that.

    It would be much better if the aid money were used to fund an accountable system to investigate corruption. Thus would actually be much better off for those countries.

    Reply
    • Actually, that’s partly what Irish Aid does: fund public accountability in programme countries. As it happens, people also aren’t aware that our beloved Revenue Commissioners has worked well with the Rwandan government (not a programme country) to improve their taxation system – and therefore accountability systems.

      Corruption – you’re right, around $25 billion is lost annually due to illicit financial flows. But I’d remind you that it’s American and European corporations and business that are driving that. And our own IFSC isn’t innocent in facilitating this trade.

      I think this PAC meeting has exposed something very positive: that accountability systems in the Auditor General’s office are effective and Ugandan civil society ain’t takin’ no shit either. That’s a positive outcome of investing in accountability in programme countries.

      Reply
  • Not a single cent would I give. Recession or no recession. Simple.

    Reply
  • Any chance we could get the Ugandan Auditors over here seeing as their auditing system works ?

    Reply
  • Strong thae

    Reply
  • Does anybody know who donated the other 8 million. Was it private donations by Irish people through Irish charities outside of the Irish gov. contributions or is it from other countries?

    Reply
    • This issue is concerning money from government donors – specifically, bilateral or government-to-government aid. That’s different from aid through development NGOs like Trócaire, Oxfam, etc.

      Government aid agencies collaborate a lot in developing countries because it can make aid more efficient and more effective – better value for money. The €12 million stolen Ugandan money was from a pooled fund by bilateral donors: Ireland, the Netherlands, the UK, Sweden, Denmark and Norway.

      You see, development NGOs (charities) cannot work at government level like this. Only government can, and this kind of work is VERY important.

      Reply
    • Thanks Thomas for that.

      Reply
    • A pleasure!

      Reply
  • censored 21/03/13 #

    Anglo Irish bank auditors. Good money in this auditing lark.

    Reply

Add New Comment