TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 3 °C Monday 24 November, 2014

Pro Life campaign: Irish Times abortion story ‘raises major credibility issues’

While solicitor Simon McGarr says the two paragraph apology by The Irish Times on page seven of last Saturday’s paper was inadequate in the eyes of media regulations.

Image: Joe Dunne/Photocall Ireland

THE PRO-LIFE Campaign says the story in The Irish Times that the first legal abortion had taken place at the National Maternity Hospital “raises major credibility issues” for the paper and said the recent apology is “inadequate”.

On August 23, the paper reported on the front page that doctors at the hospital had carried out the country’s first termination under the provisions of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013 – a claim that the Department of Health has refuted.

Obstetrician Dr Peter Boylan, Clinical Director at the Holles Street hospital was angered that patient details ended up in newspapers that could have revealed the woman’s identity. The hospital has since launched an internal investigation to discover the source of the leaked information.

Even after it was revealed that the first abortion under the new legislation could not have taken place, author and Health Correspondent for The Irish Times, Paul Cullen, defended his story telling Today FM’s The Last Word with Matt Cooper:

While there are rights to patient confidentiality, there are also rights for the public to know what is happening. And in this case, and in all the reporting by The Irish Times on this issue, over the last year and before, we’ve been trying to put out there what is in the public interest.

The paper has since issued an apology about it’s front page story. It appeared in last Saturday’s edition, eight days later, in the right-hand corner of page seven:

image

(Pic: Tuppenceworth.ie)

Solicitor Simon McGarr wrote on Tuppenceworth.ie that the apology was inadequate in the eyes of media regulations. He said the Code of Practice of the Press Council of Ireland states:

When appropriate, a retraction, apology, clarification, explanation or response shall be published promptly and with due prominence.

The guidelines also suggest what should happen when a front page story has been found to be false:

Where a complaint has been upheld in relation to an article published on the front page of a publication, the decision should be published with due prominence on one of the first four editorial pages.

McGarr said The Irish Times instead printed a two paragraph “cryptic statement” on page seven of the paper, which he believes was inadequete.

The Pro-Life Campaign have also come out against the abortion story and the “embarrassing admission” that “the case described in the article did not happen”.

“The revelation that the front-page story, which was picked up by the international media, never happened, is extraordinary… An apology for this extraordinary report seems inadequate and the public deserves a fuller explanation of how it came about,” said Caroline Simons of the Pro Life Campaign. While Dr Ruth Cullen said: “For The Irish Times to print its apology on page seven of the paper only adds insult to injury.”

TheJournal.ie’s calls to The Irish Times for comment were not immediately returned.

Doctor angered at ‘outrageous breach of patient confidentiality’ at Holles Street>

Department of Health says abortion laws have not yet commenced>

Data Protection Commissioner contacts maternity hospital over abortion data leak>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (41 Comments)

Add New Comment