TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Three-year-old Katie Lonergan’s only wish is to walk

So far €13,000 of the €60,000 needed has been raised to send Katie to the US for the life changing surgery she needs that will give her the chance to walk.

Katie Lonergan
Katie Lonergan
Image: Katie's Wish to Walk via Facebook

THERE HAS BEEN a lot of talk about Katie Lonergan this past week, the three-year-old girl from Co Kilkenny, who has cerebral palsy spastic quadriplegia but is determined to walk.

Katie is a surviving twin, born 15 weeks early. She fought to survive, spending 19 weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Waterford Regional Hospital, during that time she underwent heart surgery in Crumlin and had numerous blood transfusions. This battle left Katie with lasting effects and she was diagnosed as profoundly deaf and with cerebral palsy spastic quadriplegia.

Even after being told that Katie would never walk, her parents Aisling and John never gave up hope.

They heard about Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy, a surgery that eases muscle spasticity and improves mobility for children with spastic cerebral palsy. However, the treatment is not available in Ireland, but is offered in Bristol, UK and Missouri, USA.

Katie when she was only a few weeks old. Picture: Katie’s Wish to Walk Facebook

Although the HSE has started offering SDR treatment in Bristol through the ‘Treatment Abroad Scheme’, the Lonergans were told that Katie would not qualify as she was too badly affected.

“I would love if the HSE could eventually provide for this because there are so many Irish children who are looking for SDR,” Aisling told TheJournal.ie. “Even raising awareness through Katie is all worthwhile.”

Aisling said they decided against Bristol because the process “takes too long” and although it will be more expensive, they chose America for treatment.

“We felt, and we still feel, our best option is to go to America with Katie,” Aisling said. “We gathered all of the relevant information needed for America and within two weeks we had a reply. It’s the sooner the better we get treatment for Katie because her hips are developing abnormally.”

Aisling explained the surgery works in every case but the degree it works best depends on how much work and physio is put in after.

Katie with her brother Jamie at Christmas. Picture: Katie’s Wish to Walk Facebook

Katie was three in September and Jamie, her 18-month-old younger brother, is already getting up and running by her, which Aisling explains ”is hard for us to see”.

The family hope to travel to America in April and will find out a definite date next month. So far they have raised €13,000 of the €60,000 needed to fund the trip and treatment, but Aisling believes that any chance Katie has to walk is priceless.

To give her independence and a better quality of life is priceless. It will open so many doors for her.

We live in a small rural community and they have promised us they will leave no stone unturned to make sure we have the money to go to America when we need to go.

“People are rallying around to offer their help and support,” said Aisling. “It is so inspiring to see the generosity of people.”

For more details and to donate visit Katie’s Wish to Walk.

Read: Charity sees 16 per cent increase in donations to needy in 2012 >

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • Jesus 60000€ is nothing when you think if the money this country wasted. Bertie spent that amount on make-up each year! Can’t the HSE raise even some of the money??

    Reply
  • This is the article about my child and Bristol will NOT perform the op on my child with or without the money. They say she is too badly affected and they wouldnt touch her. America have said they feel she could walk independently after sdr. I dont have a choice of ‘destination’ as has been said. I wish I did!!!!

    Reply
  • It’s a strange country/world we live in, where parents have to ask for assistance from the general public to help a child live a normal life.
    Where are all those pro-lifers now!?

    Reply
    • I’d say they’re all at mass!!!

      Reply
    • Why is this a pro-life/pro choice issue?

      Reply
    • ??? What a bizaar comment. Are you suggesting the child should have been aborted Liam?

      Reply
    • He’s obviously saying why aren’t they protesting about this, not that the child should have been aborted. Such a thing to write.

      Reply
    • Thanks SB. I don’t like to respond to ignorance, in the hope that they use their own brains once in a while.

      Reply
    • I doubt if that’s what he’s saying, maybe instead of all the posters and busses etc paid for for yesterdays march they could have donated to this worthy cause for an actual baby!!!

      Reply
    • Your talking through what your profile picture suggests your head is. Why does this have to become a pro life/pro choice issue? And sorry but you can’t blame people for assuming that you may be suggesting that abortion could have prevented this. So rather that label people ejects maybe be more creative in your comments. And of course because I’v just made a comment that wasn’t outright pro choice I’ll get tons of red thumbs.

      Reply
    • While I see the link (tenuous as it is), I think a more appropriate question would be why, after years of unprecedented economic prosperity, do we not have a healthcare system capable of coping with such issues? I’d also suggest that you would find people, pro-life and pro-choice, sympathetic to this child’s plight and willing to help in whatever way they can. It’s unnecessary to turn this into a pro-life vs pro-choice debate.

      Reply
    • Mark
      I think that’s an easy one to answer. In a country with our population you simply cannot locate the necessary services for one in a million type medical conditions. This has nothing to do with money but rather the coming together of research and funding that is carried out in only four or five centres in the world.
      Second to this is the idea that we should expect the State to provide the necessary monies for citizens to travel abroad in each and every case where last chance or rare procedures are carried out no matter how low the probability of clinical success. Well our HSE is quite good in this arena and so also are the Irish Health Insurers but there have to be strict conditions and these were apparently imposed in the case here. Yes, the HSE would pay but only for the treatment available in the Bristol centre. The family decided they wanted to go to the US and that is their choice but the funding would have to be voluntary. So I don’t understand why there is an issue.

      Reply
    • My understanding is that the hse will not pay for the treatment in Bristol, Mark.

      Reply
  • Did you read the article? America can do it sooner, which is important because Katie’s hips are developing abnormally. I also took from it that there is better after care in America, which is crucial. I would do what was in the best interests for me child no matte what it cost.

    Reply
  • once again the HSE letting down the sick and needy

    Reply
  • Its important we give this child the best chance medicine can offer. So much money was spent over Christmas on gifts and celebrations by comparison. If all in our community gave a little we could do a great good. We can feel part of joy this girl would feel if able to run about and play. It’s only money that is needed. What would any of you do if she were your child or relative….

    Reply
  • 20/01/13 #

    Please read my article again. They’re going to the US because the whole process is much quicker. Not for a holiday. What a shameful comment.

    Reply
  • Utter and total nonsense. A pretty shameful comment.

    Reply

Add New Comment