TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

New mortgage-to-rent scheme could help up to 3,500 families

The scheme will be available nationally to families on low incomes in houses less than €220,000.

The mortgage-to-rent scheme will be rolled out nationally from today.
The mortgage-to-rent scheme will be rolled out nationally from today.
Image: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland

UP TO 3,500 struggling homeowners will be able to write off their mortgages under new plans being rolled out by the government later today.

The new national mortgage-to-rent scheme, to be announced by housing minister Jan O’Sullivan, will allow  people with no realistic chance of repaying their mortgages to sell their properties to a housing association - preventing thousands of people from being evicted across the country.

The family will then stay in their home as a tenant, paying rent to the housing association rather than as an owner occupier with a mortgage.

“Last year the Government placed housing associations at the heart of social housing provision,” said Simon Brooke, Head of Policy at Clúid Housing Association, which is involved in the scheme.

In the current economic climate this scheme really reflects how innovative solutions can prevent some people from losing their home.

AIB, GE Money and Start Mortages are taking part, with Ulster Bank and Bank of Ireland also expected to sign up.

Under the plan, families struggling to repay their mortgage give up their home to the bank that holds the mortgage. The bank then sells this to the housing association at the current market rate, not the value of the original mortgage. The bank will absorb the loss incurred from selling the property at lower than its original value.

The homeowner then becomes a tenant of the housing association, which sets the rent at a price the family can afford.

The scheme is only available to those on low incomes, and the house must be worth less than €220,000.

GE Money was involved in the first mortgage to rent scheme earlier this year, where a family was two days away from eviction. They now rent the home from Clúid, after GE wrote off almost €140,000.

NAMA confirms plan to demolish derelict Longford apartment block >

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • What about people stuck with bloody pyrite houses struggling while it crumbles down round us-everyone’s walked away it’s a joke

    Reply
  • Gastro they will still have to pay rent .my point being that the rent that they will b paying should b their mortgage not rent to an association. But the gov.would rather protect the banks than the homeowners

    Reply
  • This is more market interference that rewards financial imprudence. They are effectively jumping the council housing list and landing taxpayers with the remainder of their debts. Be under no illusions, these affordable rents will amount to a couple of hundred euro per month, funded by renters who pay thousands per month and have no security of tenure or protection from eviction if they cannot afford their rent.

    Reply
    • Paying thousands of euro’s a month is absolutely nuts.

      The rent in Dublin is obscene, as the economy is overly focused on that one city, oft due to planning corruption and mismanagement of the economy.

      Reply
    • What option do we have, people go where the work is. Rents are too high because Nama is being used to restrict supply. We also have a situation where valuable housing stock is being lived in by people who refuse to pay their mortgage or surrender possession.

      Reply
    • Why not just right down the mortgage for the homeowner?
      Why get expensive middlemen housing associations involved?
      Jobs for the boys?

      Moral hazard, my arse.
      The banks and their ”experts” were the stupid ones who sold these jumbo , unsustainable, ”unstresstested”, ponzi mortgages in the first place.
      Let them clean up their own mess.

      Reply
    • And what about the chancers who took out the mortgages…not in any way liable? It’s a far more complicated situation than ‘the bankers are to blame’

      The comment about Dublin being prioritized is silly..it’s the capital city and we also have large investment in Cork and Galway, you can’t say it’s been all Dublin.

      Reply
    • Blame the bankers Benjamin?

      If analysed correctly and honestly 90% of the mortgages that these ”bankers” and their ”experts” gave out in the last decade would be classified as distressed.
      Strange coincidence?

      Chancers?
      Please explain?

      As we speak here today the collections agents from these bust corrupt banks are going around the country underhandedly intimidating, harassing and shaming money out of families who are below the breadline, like loan sharks, while at the same time their corrupt bosses are discreetly moving their ”legal” repomen in behind their backs.
      In some cases this has been going on for 3-4 years plus.
      In a lot of these cases the bank’s ”loan sharks” are also feeding the mortgage holders with bullsh1t stories and lies that ”we are going to work something out for you pal” so that they can prolong this ”milking” process.
      Personally I know a lot of cases where people have borrowed money from their elderly parents because the banks ”loan sharks” reassured them that they would ”work something out” for them.
      The banks in question were made well aware of this, and yet 3-4 years on, they are still milking these poor people and their elderly parent of their last few quid, and they are very happy with this arrangement.

      Instead of repossessing the house 3-4+ years ago and selling it when it had some value (and reducing the debt on the home owner).
      The bank decided to delay and
      let the arrears build up
      let the property devalue
      bleed the homeowner and their family of their last few quid
      leave the home owner in the house to maintain and keep the property from being vandalised (basically to keep the bank’s asset in good condition until the market picked up for the bank or to justify the bank getting another bailout)
      Whilst all the time the bank kept feeding the homeowner with a bullsh1t and false promises as they ruined their credit score and kept them trapped in this disgusting, depressing dark, fragile place.

      At least these unfortunate homeowners were using real money to pay their mortgage and furnish their homes and pay their taxes unlike these ponzi banks with their false, borrowed, confetti cash dished out on doomed to fail, aggressive dog eat dog commissions.

      Blame the bankers?
      Sean Fitzpatrick, one ”banker”, ran up €32 billion and counting that we will have to pay back for him?
      4 years on our government(s) have done nothing to bring him to task?
      He sleeps so soundly in his expensive family homes and on his long vacations in Marbella.
      Yet, all some people give a damn about is wanting to see their neighbor thrown out off their home.

      Chancers Benjamin?
      Tell that to the kids of these destroyed homes who are held to ransom.

      Reply
  • Sounds to me like a lot of private housing estates will effectively be turned into council estates…Hard to take for the people meeting their mortgage payments to suddenly have social housing next door…If they decide to move out??..They can stick whoever they want next door to you..

    Reply
  • Don’t think this is a good idea.would b much better if the revised downwards the mortgages as they did in Norway.people will not b as interested in maintaining their houses etc.if they don’t own them.why not let people own their houses as opposed to an association owning them.

    Reply
  • It seems reasonable at first, giving struggling households an easy way to get out if massive debt. I’d like to know what happens to the money they’ve already paid off though.. Is it lost?

    Reply
  • Well Well, Jan O Sullivan has just confirmed on the news at one what a joke this is, she pretty much confirmed that the decision re wiping any outstanding debt on the house has been sold at market value (probably 40% less than what it was mortgaged at) is up to the lender and essentially the government neither want to get involved nor have any powers re this matter. In essence she admitted this scheme will only be for people on the bread line and entitled to social housing. Most disturbing was her response or lack of same to Sean O Rourkes asking what incentive do people have to give up their homes only to become tenants continuing to have the burden of massive negative equity debt hanging over them, her response? Lenders will have to be realistic? extraordinary stuff.

    Reply
    • I knew it seemed too good to be true!! So basically they just can’t kick you out of the house.
      And how will that work then?? if you can’t pay the mortgage in the first place what makes them think you’ll be able to pay the debt and rent the property??
      Bizarre, I’m obviously still missing something.

      Reply
  • Cannot understand why our houses cannot b sold back to us at today’s prices instead of selling them to an association at today’s prices.what about our deposits on our houses.all gone thro.no fault of ours.this has to b immoral governing.

    Reply
  • What happens when paying the rent becomes too much? If the rent is really rent supplement and not being paid out of income, why bother with the charade? Taxpayer on the hook again. Also are there any inheritance rights for children?

    Reply
  • Seems a good idea, do they define what ‘low income’ is?

    Reply
    • Clearly smug and in affected comments chancers what a joke since when did trying to own your home become a crime. That’s nearly everyone now Sean Quinn his family developers landlords, business owners anyone from mayo who has a functioning brain mick Wallace sur we are all criminals except fg/lab. They don’t just want your houses they want your organs

      Reply
  • Sell the Nama houses off to families for very affordable prices, give them free to emigrants who are self employed and will return and work here,give them free to emigrants who want to retire back here and are coming with pension and savings. Get rid of the bloody things and do it in a way that benefits wider society and the economy.

    Reply

Add New Comment