TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 19 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Priory Hall residents hold vigil ahead of second Christmas

The residents are calling on all parties to work quickly to put an end to their ‘homelessness’.

Santa

A sign outside the Donaghmede complex tonight. (Image: @prioryhall)

A CANDLELIGHT VIGIL was attended by residents of Priory Hall this evening to mark the second Christmas they will spend out of their own homes as a result of shoddy building regulation during the so-called Celtic Tiger property boom.

It is 14 months since the 256 residents of the Donaghmede complex were evacuated over fire safety concerns. Between October 2011 and today, no remedial works have been carried out on the apartment blocks.

It is understood that the repairs bill to make the buildings safe would be at least €7.3 million but neither the developer Tom McFeely or Dublin City Council – which owns 26 of the apartments – are prepared to foot the cost of the extensive work.

In a statement today, the residents said they are being forced to live month-to-month with constant uncertainty over their futures.

“Families still do not know how long they can remain in their temporary accommodation and still face the threat of Dublin City Council’s Supreme Court Appeal to try to absolve the council of providing the residents temporary accommodation,” they said.

DCC are waiting for a hearing date for a Supreme Court appeal against an order which made it responsible for paying for the current housing of the residents in NAMA-owned properties. The banks, residents and DCC are also in the midst of a resolution process about the mortgages – most of which are about €250,000 – but little has been made public about the negotiations.

Many residents have moratoriums in place with their lenders but spokesperson Graham Usher noted that this just “pushes residents further into debt”.

“Due to the mortgage providers unwillingness to acknowledge the unique circumstances the residents face we are being forced into further debt on our mortgages as the current state of limbo continues indefinitely.

“It is clear that the sense of urgency felt by the residents to find a solution to this intolerable situation is not felt by the other parties involved. The residents are calling on all parties to work quickly to put an end to the national disgrace that is Priory Hall.”

PH Before and After

An image on the Priory Hall Facebook page shows an apartment before the evacuation and as it looks today.

READ: Another Christmas out of their homes, Priory Hall residents still ‘in the dark’

MORE: Rats, mould and dampness: Priory Hall 10 months on>

RELATED: Dublin City Council spends €638,000 on security for Priory Hall>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • A positive disgrace that the resident,s have spent two Christmases out of their homes ,it must be shattering for them

    Reply
  • John 17/12/12 #

    The bank approved their mortgages and the council allowed the building to go ahead. Why are they not shouldering their share in this disgraceful situation? The poor residents, I cannot help but get angry when I read about priory hall

    Reply
    • I get how the Council messed up (sorta) but all the Banks did was give them money to buy a flat – I don’t think they they are responsible.

      Reply
    • I think they are because the property was not in good title.
      The surveyors for the bank should not have passed it and the buyers surveyor should have picked up on it.
      Also the property did not meet the gold shield standard.
      There is a chap called Noel C Manning (fire engineer from Enniskerry) has some very interesting things to say about it.

      Reply
    • Mike,
      Are the surveyors liable?

      Reply
    • @ Colin.
      I think they are liable. If I survey a boat and pass it as sound & seaworthy and it sinks due to a fault then I am liable.
      If my DOE test center passes a vehicle as road worthy and a wheel or a bushing packs in then they are liable .
      A surveyor’s job involves a full and acurate survey of the premises,if the premises turns out to be a fire hazzard then the survey was incomplete and incorrect.

      Reply
    • Mike, quite apart from this, if you think that a ‘Buyer’ has redress….how would I (or one) go about it?

      Reply
    • @ Frank.
      Not really sure what steps to go forward from there but as I said earlier, Noel C Manning fire engineer has a huge amount of imformation on his website about recourse and legal cases.

      Reply
    • The surveyors that the purchaser employed are not liable unless they’re total thicks.

      I bought a house in 2000, got a surveyor report and the entire document was based on a template that said “as we were unable to penetrate the walls” or “we did not inspect the attic” – all in legalese – complete waste of time and money.

      If ur buying a house, look for cracks. If there’s none, and no evidence of recent renovation ur sound. Throw a spirit level on the floor. If level ur good to go

      Reply
    • This country is progressing backwards years ago there would be a Clark of works appointed by the local authority there was one of these men even on minor road works to make certain sure work was done right . Now nothing or nobody to check on shoddy work done mostly by foreign workers??

      Reply
    • @cat, if memory serves, Dublin council had two inspectors. For all the building work going on. My bet is that they didn’t get much inspecting done…

      Reply
  • I wouldn’t mind, but sorting this problem out is not a big deal. The money that has already been spent on procrastinating/legal fees/dodging accountability would have paid for the remedial works 2-3 times over! It’s an absolute disgrace!!

    Reply
  • Seamie 17/12/12 #

    What were DCC thinking aquiring 26 apartments but not making sure they’re habitable. Surely they would want to make good the faults and get the tenants back in. Who was responsible in DCC?

    Reply
  • Conor 17/12/12 #

    Those poor people are facing a second Christmas out of their homes because of greedy, shoddy property developers and bankers. It makes me sick!

    Reply
  • Considering the BILLIONS of our tax money that goes down a drain hole on paying bond holders’ unsecured bond returns, is it too much to expect that some of our tax money could be used to support these poor people? The state can get Mc Feely through due process… But surely the state could step up here and support its citizens?

    Reply
  • mcgoo 17/12/12 #

    It’s shocking that no works have happened in 14 months. I fear many more such cases will pop up around the country over the coming years given our building standards in the so-called “good times”.

    Reply
  • mart_n 17/12/12 #

    The amount of money being spent on kicking this can down the road is ridiculous. It’d most likely be cheaper to write off debts where applicable and where it makes sense to do so. It’s stupid to further cripple people who genuinely cannot afford to better their arrangements with this hanging over them, and costs us all in the long run.

    Reply
  • I hope the vigil is at the city managers house every day throughout Xmas. He is ultimately responsible. It happened under his watch and his building / Planning department are also responsible Will he keep his job and pension???
    This man stood over some of the worst construction work in Dublin for years and signed off on all of the work – that is his ultimate responsibility.

    Reply
  • A Government must have procedures in place to protect his people from this happening….. What I would do? Definitely default on my mortgage and hand back the key. The burden is simply too high for the individuals so I would leave the problem where it came from…. banks and local government.

    Reply
  • Now that the trade unions have tied themselves to Croke Park and cosmetic ‘anti’ -austerity marches, perhaps this is something that could awaken their consciences.

    No demands for higher pay, job security or better terms & conditions, just proper housing for Priory Hall residents.

    Reply
  • @ fighting Irish they are homeless and they were paying for one

    Reply

Add New Comment