TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Just who were Diarmuid Martin’s comments about child protection aimed at?

Campaigner Andrew Madden is puzzled by the Archbishop’s remarks that the State taking more responsibility for protecting Ireland’s children might not necessarily make an impact.

Andrew Madden Author of Altar Boy, a Story of Life After Abuse. Spent over 15 years campaigning for the safety, welfare, and protection of children and was the first person in Ireland to go public about clerical child sexual abuse in 1995

CAMPAIGNER Andrew Madden responds to the Archbishop of Dublin’s comments that while the Catholic Church had failed to protect children in the past, so too had the State:

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin said in a speech at the Mater Dei Institute for Education earlier this week that giving the State greater responsibility for children will not automatically ensure improved child protection and increased childrens’ rights. He went on to say that it is not the State’s job to bring up children: it is the job of parents and that the measures needed to address the challenges of improving child protection will require huge effort and go way beyond the creation, simply, of new structures.

I can’t help wondering who these comments were meant to be aimed at. Everyone I know who has a genuine interest in advancing the safety, welfare, protection and rights of children already knows that no one single measure will move that agenda of work along effectively and efficiently.

The wording that will be presented to the Irish people to vote on in a referendum on Children’s Rights is unlikely to have anything to do making it the State’s job to bring up children. It is far more likely to be about ensuring that where the parents of any child fail in their responsibility towards such child, the State as guardian of the common good shall, by proportionate means, as shall be regulated by law, endeavour to supply or supplement the place of the parents, regardless of their marital status – quite different to bringing up all the children of the State.

Apart from a referendum on Children’s Rights, there is of course a huge amount of work to be done and it is refreshing, to say the least, to have a government in place that not only recognises this fact but has committed to doing much of that work and has started well. The appointment of a Minister for Children with full cabinet status is a very welcome start.

The commitment to divest the HSE of all responsibility for the child protection system and put that work directly under the responsibility of the Minister and Department for Children is also very welcome.

Placing Children First on a statutory basis and introducing a system of independent audit of compliance with Children First is another necessary step the Government has agreed to. Sarah’s Law is Fine Gael policy, another important child protection measure as is ensuring proper implementation of the StaySafe/SPHE programmes in all schools.

The Children’s Rights Referendum is not a panacea for advancing the safety, welfare, protection and rights of children, but most people who are genuinely interested in that agenda already know that.

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin: More State responsibility will not automatically ensure child protection>

About the author:

Andrew Madden  / Author of Altar Boy, a Story of Life After Abuse. Spent over 15 years campaigning for the safety, welfare, and protection of children and was the first person in Ireland to go public about clerical child sexual abuse in 1995

Read next:

Comments (6 Comments)

  • How far removed from reality can one be?

    Reply
  • As a social worker and some one who has tried to have a fair debate around church and issues of abuse. Martin comments prove the head boys are delusional at this point! To put blame on the state at this point fails to acknowledge the power grab of the church in Ireland of the states social institutions! Martin just doesn’t see how children’s rights will be bolstered by being recognized in the constitution. In fact if anything it will make the invisible voices visible. As well as addressing Christian right pressure groups so visible in Roscommon. The pope is on the way, if only he cleared the likes of Martin out..

    Reply
  • so is martin tryin to take the blame frm the church,yet again.. is he sayin that the parents of the victims of abuse didnt take any responsibility for the protection of their children…dats such typical ignorant response..

    Reply
  • Archbishop Martin, when he has shown that his own Institution and his own work has done what is neccessary – full reveal of ALL files they hold on ALL allegations of abuse, revoking of the’ Crimen Sollicitationis’ Document, abandoning of the primacy of Canon Law in cases of criminal behaviour, accepting MANDATORY REPORTING of all abuse allegations, defrocking ALL clergy who have been proven to be abusers, support for Empathic Parenting as a primary prevention of further abuse, revoking Baptism on defenceless children (leaving the choice of faith to when a young person is able to make that choice), revoking the Church’s stance on the use of condoms, and the proper restoration and reparation for all survivors, then perhaps he may have comments to make that others might take heed.

    The underlying reality is that the Institution he represents has done everything it can to deflect responsibility and accountability for it’s own actions. In many cases this has re-traumatised Survivors, leading in many cases to Suicides of Survivors.

    He has a LONG way to go on this matter.

    Reply
  • The Church, by its secrecy and inertia has forfeited any credibility to which it might pretend. Bishop Martin is entitled to give his view , but , so lacking in charity it is ; ” but the braying of brass and the tinkling of cymbals”, and therefore of little worth.

    Reply
  • Martin is a mealy mouthed little man who is simply sucking up to Taoiseach Enda Kenny and the other Government ministers, especially the Tanaiste Eamonn Gilmore and the Labour ministers, as well as all the other political parties.
    In short he is playing the chief Yes Man in an attempt to curry State favour for the Church once again within the system as it used to be in former and terrible days.
    Martin knows that most of the media, for some strange reason not known to anybody, not even to themselves, are pushing this referendum too.
    With this referendum the State is replacing the Church with regard to the children of the nation which is the worst possible news for the poor kids themselves.
    Personally I don’t see anything at all in this referendum, I suspect it will all turn out for the worst , as usually happens when Irish parties and politicians all agree.
    I can’t at all understand the position of the Left who seem to think that this referendum is some great big wonderful liberal thing.
    All it’s doing is taking everybody’s eyes off the government cuts as it’s meant to do.

    Reply

Add New Comment