TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

€12.6m of sports funding went to disadvantaged areas

A total of 41 per cent of the overall funding went to disadvantaged areas, Minister Michael Ring said.

A TOTAL OF €12.6m of sports capital went to disadvantaged areas in 2012, it was announced today.

Minister of State for Tourism and Sport, Michael Ring, confirmed that €12.6 million of the €31 million allocated under the last round of the sports capital allocations went to 255 separate projects, which were all based in disadvantaged areas.

The money under the Sports Capital Programme was awarded to 648 projects at the end of 2012 in total.

The news shows a focus on increasing participation in sport in disadvantaged areas, the Minister said:

When I announced the last Sports Capital Programme I said it would have a particular focus on projects which increase active participation in sport, particularly in disadvantaged areas. The focus was therefore on draining pitches, installing floodlights, or improvements to sports halls and dressing rooms. The aim was to give people more opportunities to get active, and stay active.

He said he was delighted to see that so many clubs from disadvantaged areas qualified under the revised criteria. As well as the changes to the criteria, the minimum amount of matching funding which clubs and organisations needed to provide themselves in order to apply for the grant was reduced by half.

This meant that some groups only needed to raise a minimum of between 5 to 15 per cent, depending the type of group, to apply.

Read: Rith races ahead to give €15,000 funding to Irish language projects>

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • This is a good thing the more facilities in disadvantaged areas the less chance of anti social behaviour if kids have an outlet to keep them off the streets this is a positive also it will promote healthy living

    Reply
  • Whatever happened to parents, rather than government investment, keeping children from of anti-social activities?

    Reply
  • Sorry but I believe no matter how much money is thrown at these disadvantaged areas it makes no difference in reducing levels of anti-social behaviour. Most of the time the new facilities are vandalised quite often by the kids using them. Waste of time.

    Reply
    • @ Tom to an extent I agree with your statement the youth and local communities where this money is been spent should be empowered to spend money on facilities that they feel will benefit the community there should be guidelines set out by the dept but the community can use it as it feels fit in this country everything is dictated by our govt and this in turn leads to trouble whereas if the community can spend it as they see fit then it will be better served by all

      Reply
    • So what do you suggest?

      Leave them to their own devices and spend the money on everyone else?

      Reply
    • Look there is no simple answers to this but it is proven that in disadvantaged areas there is more health issues instead of funding been provided it should be first proposed how moneys will be spent for example a walk path around a green field or new sports equipment but before money is given it should be approved it should not jus be given out free will but at the same time those in disadvantaged areas need to be looked after with current economics and the state of our country poverty both social and economic is rising and these issues need to be addressed

      Reply
  • Sick of kids who partake in anti social behavior been rewarded how about we start rewarding the areas where there is little or no anti social behaviour always the same in this country reward the kids who cause most trouble :(

    Reply
  • And the other 18.4 went where minister?

    Reply
  • Seems like the GAA received most of these funds! Disadvantaged?

    Reply
  • Surely if you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth, or into nothing at all – you are still equal. Funds should be spread equally in my opinion, I can understand the argument for more in disadvantaged area’s but I don’t think it’s fair, just cause Rupert was born in D4 shouldn’t mean that he has less access to public amenities (Obviously places like this will probably have private amenities, for which Rupert’s parents would need to pay handsomely for.).

    We’re all equal, just because your parent’s are poor doesn’t mean you’re entitled to more.

    Reply

Add New Comment