TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Assad: Forces ‘need more time’ to win Syria battle

The Syrian president made the comments yesterday, in which he also dismissed talk of buffer zones.

This citizen journalist image shows people walking past a gutted police station flying the Syrian revolutionary flag after fighting between rebels and Syrian troops in the Yarmouk camp for Palestinian refugees in south Damascus, Syria
This citizen journalist image shows people walking past a gutted police station flying the Syrian revolutionary flag after fighting between rebels and Syrian troops in the Yarmouk camp for Palestinian refugees in south Damascus, Syria
Image: Anonymous/AP/Press Association Images

THE UN SECURITY Council was to meet today to tackle deteriorating humanitarian conditions in Syria, a day after President Bashar al-Assad rejected moves to create buffer zones in his country.

Pressure

The meeting comes as violence whipped through eastern suburbs of Damascus, where activists said clashes broke out between the Syrian army and rebels before dawn this morning following a bloody day in which 44 civilians were killed in the capital alone.

Regional pressure mounted on Assad when Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi told a summit in Tehran the uprising in Syria is against an “oppressive regime” and a continuation of the Arab Spring, embarrassing Iran, which strongly supports the Damascus regime.

Morsi’s comments sparked a walkout by the Syrian delegation, Egyptian state media said.

Buffer zones

Turkey has floated the idea of creating buffer zones within Syria to receive those displaced by the conflict so they do not flood across the borders into neighbouring countries.

Assad, however, scoffed at the idea in an interview on Wednesday with pro-regime Addounia TV channel.

Talk of buffer zones firstly is not on the table and secondly it is an unrealistic idea by hostile countries and the enemies of Syria

He also said his forces need more time to win the battle in Syria, amid fresh fighting, which according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights killed another 128 nationwide on Wednesday – 77 civilians, 19 rebels, 32 soldiers.

The Syrian Revolution General Council, a network of local activists, said gunfire reverberated today around the Qaboon district in eastern Damascus, where rebels earlier in the week claimed to have shot down a helicopter.

The Local Coordination Committees, another activist network, said fighting also broke out in southern Tadamun neighbourhood, where shelling and machinegun fire was heard.

In the eastern province of Deir Ezzor, rebels sent mortars crashing into a military security headquarters in the town of Albi Kamal, while fierce clashes broke out in Deir Ezzor city near another military security headquarters, the Observatory reported.

Meeting

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, who will preside the UN meeting as France heads the Council in August, said the issue of buffer zones would be brought up, even if “it is very complicated.”

Syria’s neighbours Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey and Iraq were all to send ministers to the meeting.

French President Francois Hollande has said France was working with its partners on the possible establishment of such buffer zones.

But Fabius admitted implementing these would be “very complicated” and require the imposition of partial no-fly zones.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has said Turkey is in talks with the United Nations on ways to shelter thousands of refugees on Syrian soil.

Russia called for an impartial investigation into the latest “barbaric” violence in and around Damascus.

“We insist on a meticulous and impartial investigation into the circumstances of the latest tragic events” using the resources of the United Nations’ newly opened office in Damascus, the Russian foreign ministry said.

It singled out a car bomb that exploded in the middle of a funeral this week and the discovery of several hundred bodies near the Damascus suburb of Daraya on Sunday that the rebels charge was the result of a massacre by regime forces.

The new UN-Arab League envoy on the Syria conflict, Lakhdar Brahimi, wants to visit Damascus in the next three weeks, his spokesman told reporters at the United Nations.

Talks

Meanwhile, UN chief Ban Ki-moon held talks in Tehran with Iran’s leaders including on the Syria conflict.

After meeting parliament speaker Ali Larijani, Iran’s parliamentary news website quoted Ban as saying:

Iran can play an important role in solving the Syrian crisis peacefully.

Human Rights Watch meanwhile said that Syrian government troops committed war crimes when they dropped bombs and fired artillery at or near at least 10 bakeries in Aleppo province over the past three week.

- © AFP, 2012

Read: Syria: UN chief ‘shocked’ at massacre reports>

Read next:

Comments (6 Comments)

  • This conflict reminds me of a quote from the film “Lord of War”;
    “I never sold weapons to Saddam Hussain, not out of patriotism though, word was he was writing a lot of checks that bounced these days”
    The Russians and the Chinese will stop supporting Assad as soon as its becomes clear he can’t hold onto control and then try and win favour with the new regime so that they still have an ally in the Middle East to check the influence of Israel in the region.
    How many innocent people have to die in the meantime in this repeat of Yugoslavia is another question though, but probably ranks very low in the consideration of the Russians and Chinese.

    Reply
    • David, it’s pretty clear that the US, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia are only supporting the rebels to check the influence of Iran in the region. To blame the Russians and Chinese for providing support to Assad due to purely geostrategic interests overlooks the fact that the US, Turkey and the Gulf States are providing support to the rebels for the exact same reasons.

      You didn’t really think this was about democracy did you? If that was the case where was the support for the uprisings in the shia provinces in Saudi Arabia or in Bahrain? The US knows that Sunni regimes are regimes that will be innately hostile to Iran. A resurgent Sunni alliance of countries in the region will further ebb away at the influence Iran can exert.

      Reply
    • That’s right, Neil.

      Neither of the blocs you mention has acted morally in this sad episode, which of course is exactly what we’d expect. But the narrative seems to be: USA et al. = good, China, Russia et al. = baaaaaad. It is a very ill-thought-out ‘analysis’.

      Reply
    • Then maybe the US, Russia, China and the EU should launch a joint peace-building mission to actually help the Syrian people, who frankly don’t care who wins as long as calm is restored, but thats not going to happen because the US, RF and PRC are looking out for their own interests and the EU would have to beg its member states for the use of their troops, net result long bloody civil war with massive civilian causalities with a minor but not significant change in the balance of power between the major power blocs in the region.
      Petr, you’d be the first person to condem the US for shielding Israel from the results of human rights abuses with it’s veto powers, why so slow to do the same about China and Russia?

      Reply
    • David,

      I don’t think I’m slow to condemn them. I detest the Russian regime and don’t even get me started on China’s abuses. All I’m saying is that their behaviour is not surprising in the least. Their role in this affair has not been noble, something they have in common with the US and GCC states.

      Reply
    • I think the point, David, is that Saudi/US/Nato+special forces ‘communications support’ are the aggressors, and that this is just preliminary to further escalation of the ‘full spectrum dominance’ PNAC; bound for Teheran, Moscow, and return to the 19th century ‘Great Game’ Open Door policy on dividing up China. Totalitarian dictatorship of the corporatariat is the foreseeable future, with all its Orwellian implications..not what was forecast as the ‘peace dividend’ of the end of the euphemistically misnamed ‘cold war’. Newspeak is not really too new.
      As the Africans say, ‘When the elephants fight, the ants get crushed.’

      Reply

Add New Comment