TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Assad regime ‘could use chemical weapons’

Syria’s ex-ambassador to Iraq, Nawaf Fares, said that there are unconfirmed reports that such weapons might have already been used.

File photo of Nawaf Fares (centre)
File photo of Nawaf Fares (centre)
Image: Bassem Tellawi/AP/Press Association Images

THE ASSAD REGIME has chemical weapons and will not hesitate to use them, the country’s former ambassador to Iraq has said.

Nawaf Fares was speaking to the BBC when he told them that there were already unconfirmed reports that such weapons have already been used – and that al-Qaeda had collaborated with the regime for some major bombings.

Meanwhile, Syrian rebels fired grenades at tanks and troops while regime armour shelled Damascus neighbourhoods on Monday.

A ring of fierce clashes nearly encircled the heavily guarded capital as rebels seeking to overthrow President Bashar Assad pushed the civil war that has been building in Syria’s impoverished provinces closer to the seat of power.

Russia

International envoy Kofi Annan, who has made little progress in brokering a political solution in Syria, met Russian leaders in Moscow the same day. The meeting came a day after the conflict crossed an important symbolic threshold, with the international Red Cross formally declaring it a civil war.

Amateur videos posted online on Monday gave glimpses of the fighting. In one, a dozen fighters crouched behind sandbags, firing at a tank down a rubble-strewn street with a machine gun and rocket-propelled grenades.

Another video showed a burnt station wagon with at least three charred bodies inside that an off-camera narrator said were government troops.

The fiercest fighting was in the southwest neighborhoods of Mezzeh, Kfar Souseh, Midan, Tadamon, Nahr Aisha and al-Zahira, while activists also reported clashes in the western suburbs and in the northern neighborhood of Barzeh.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said 12 people were killed in and around Damascus, among some 90 people killed nationwide. About a third of the dead were government troops, it said.

The government said little about the clashes, but the state news agency said the army was hunting an “armed terrorist group” in one of the neighborhoods. The regime blames the uprising on terrorists acting out a foreign conspiracy to weaken the country.

Streets were largely deserted in neighbourhoods near the fighting. Many families have fled or are still trying to get out, and fear grips those who remain.

On Monday, Morocco asked the Syrian ambassador to leave the country. Within hours, Syria’s state-run TV said the Foreign Ministry had declared Morocco’s ambassador to Syria persona non grata

- Additional reporting AP

Read: Russia vetoes UN statement on Syrian killings – again>

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • That old chestnut…

    Reply
  • Colin Powell is gonna address the UN about where the chemical weapons are. Hans Blix told him the exact location.

    Reply
  • Here we go again. Where’s Blair?

    Reply
  • Have they got a manual for getting rid of dictators that they no longer control? Sad thing is most people will fall for this shit. Love the story on CNN yesterday that Iran has missiles that can take out America and then they tell u if they put them on a ship and sail to within 500 miles of the coast. Damage done and with all this rhetoric coming out of Washington and Tel Aviv u know war is coming and they have Russia in the corner to paint as the bad guy.

    Reply
  • If I recall correctly there were also reports that Saddam has links with Al Qaida, which was proved wrong as no WMDs were found either.

    When the media uses ambigious sources such as ‘some reports suggests’ it really means ‘IT IS NOT TRUE’ and when a news makes headlines in BBC, CNN you can guess whose payroll this x ambassador is

    Reply
  • Have no desire to advocate any particular response to the awful situation in Syria right now but just want to make a point of clarification. There is lots of evidence that Syria has a sophisticated Chemical Weapons programme and the situation is not comparable with the claims that Iraq possessed WMD before the 2003 invasion. Those claims were refuted by most other intelligence agencies and civil society experts at the time, including the IAEA. On this issue there is broad consensus that Syria, which isn’t a member of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), has large stockpiles of Chemical Weapons. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists gives a good account of the programme here: http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/op-eds/fearful-of-nuclear-iran-the-real-wmd-nightmare-syria

    All this isn’t to suggest that President Assad intends to use these weapons. In fact, the likelihood is that he wouldn’t. Use of Chemical weapons on his own territory against Syrian rebels would have catastrophic environmental and economic consequences for Syria and would likely galvanize public opinion against his regime. Use of Chemical weapons against another State, such as Israel, cannot be ruled out but is similarly unlikely as the international response would be swift and most probably decisive. Russia, Syria’s only ally in the Security Council, would quickly abandon it if Chemical Weapons are used. Of course, all this depends on how desperate Assad becomes and it is far more difficult to predict what he will do the further his back is against the wall.

    Reply
  • If we want to discuss chemical weapons lets start with Israel’s proven use of banned white phosphorous on Gaza civilians…oh yeah…and that sprinkling of depleted uranium on the kids’ cornflakes in Fallujah..what my friend Modechai would call ‘facts on the ground’.
    And of course this kiddie is already on the record as ‘ perhaps being interested in a role in a future Syrian government..’.

    Reply
  • This is one of the laziest pieces of propaganda ever produced. They just copied the same lies they used in Iraq and pasted it to the current Syrian situation, yet people are still swallowing this stuff. Just listen out for the “unverified footage” or the “unconfirmed report” that has become a staple when reporting on the Syrian conflict. What news agency worth its salt would use “unverified footage” or “unconfirmed reports” in its coverage of a conflict. Yet the BBC, SKY and RTE are all reporting these unconfirmed lies as if its the truth, the whole truth and nothing but……….

    Reply
  • Didn’t see the last bit at the end……ASSOCIATED PRESS who are being drip fed news from the Pentagon and other very dodgy sources…….can we ease up on the copying and pasting please in all fairness !!

    Reply
  • @Muiris

    Read any of the threads on Syria on TheJournal and see how well this propaganda does work. Frightening.

    Reply
  • Unverified report…….Santa has joined Al-ciada and is on his way around the world with a massive cache of chemical weapons disguised as toys……..lads i think we need a UN resolution against Santa and declare a no-fly zone over Santa Land……..those elf’s are highly dangerous and could strike at any time…..lord save us !!!

    Reply
  • Where did i hear that before ? There was 500,000 plus killed over it, mmm…..for the life of me i cannot remember…oh yeah IRAQ !!! In all fairness lads , is thejournal losing it’s marbles ? Chemical weapons ? Just wondering where this story has originated from ? Reuters ? Associated Press ? CNN ? FOX ? or the pentagon media arm ? What a joke !!

    Reply

Add New Comment