TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Details of hostages’ last days emerge amid UK and Italian diplomatic row

Briton Chris McManus and Italian Franco Lamolinara died in a botched rescue attempt in north-western Nigeria yesterday. Italy’s president accused Britain of an “inexplicable” failure to consult with Italy over the mission.

A boy looks at bullet holes in the compound where the two hostages were held in Sokoto, Nigeria.
A boy looks at bullet holes in the compound where the two hostages were held in Sokoto, Nigeria.
Image: AP Photos/Jon Gambrell

TWO TWO HOSTAGES from Italy and Britain found dead during a botched rescue operation spent their final days living in bare squalor under the watchful eye of their alleged Al Qaeda-linked captors.

They drank water drawn from an underground tank and possibly enduring bouts of malaria and other illnesses. The bodies of Chris McManus and Franco Lamolinara were found yesterday during a joint British-Nigerian rescue operation, which has ignited a diplomatic dispute with Italy.

The country’s president accused Britain of an “inexplicable” failure to consult with Italy before the bungled attempt to rescue the hostages.

At the house where their bodies were discovered, the water supply came from dipping a plastic bucket into a simple underground tank in Sokoto, the major city of Nigeria’s dusty northwest.

Illnesses apparently struck as well: the remains of anti-malaria tablets, cough medicines and penicillin creams littered the compound’s dirt courtyard.

Off one unfurnished bedroom, blood pooled under a toilet and a smashed sink in a tiny bathroom, the site where those living around the compound say hostages McManus, of Britain, and Lamolinara, of Italy, died at the hands of their captors.

As curious children poked their hands through holes left behind by large-calibre ammunition fired in the botched rescue, Italy demanded an explanation for why it learned about the raid only after British special forces began their assault with Nigeria’s military.

‘Inexplicable failure’

Confusion also remained over who was responsible for the kidnapping in the first place, as a radical Islamist sect in Nigeria initially blamed for the abduction denied it was involved.

The rescue attempt began yesterday morning in Sokoto’s Mabera neighborhood, a sprawling maze of sandy roads and single-story cement homes on what used to be fertile farmland surrounding the city of 500,000 people.

Residents said a seemingly unending barrage of gunfire followed, as did an attack led by a military armoured personnel carrier.

Once inside in the compound, soldiers found the two men had been killed. Details of how and when they died remained unclear, said Steve Field, a spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron. But Field said “early indications were that both men were murdered by their captors before they could be rescued.”

The operation grew out of cooperation between Nigeria’s security forces and British military and intelligence officers who had been in the country for several months, officials familiar with the details of the operation said.

Within recent weeks, a contingent of special forces soldiers — drawn from Britain’s elite Special Boat Service — arrived in Nigeria to assist, officials said.

That preparation apparently went on without the knowledge of Italy, whose president, Giorgio Napolitano, demanded an explanation from British officials for the “inexplicable” failure to consult with his country before launching the rescue attempt.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague defended his country’s decision, saying there was no time to confer and that Italy was informed only once the rescue mission was already under way.

“We had to make a decision very quickly to go ahead with this operation,” Hague said at a meeting in Denmark. “We had very limited time. That constrained how much we were able to consult others.”

‘Sharing full information’

Hague held talks with his Italian counterpart over the failed rescue, while Britain’s ambassador to Italy also met with officials in Rome.

After the meeting, Hague and Foreign Minister Giulio Terzi issued a joint statement in which they “agreed on the urgency of sharing full information to facilitate the reconstruction and understanding of these events.”

Information from the raid came from individuals arrested by Nigeria’s security agencies before the operation, a senior official in Nigeria said. However, British officials worried the kidnappers would realize “the net was closing” on their location.

The rescue effort ends months of uncertainty about what happened to McManus and Lamolinara.

McManus was working for the construction company B.Stabilini when he was kidnapped May 12 by gunmen who stormed his apartment in the city of Birnin-Kebbi, about 110 miles away from Sokoto.

Lamolinara was also abducted. A German colleague managed to escape by scaling a wall, but a Nigerian engineer was shot and wounded.

A video later released showed the kidnappers claiming they belonged to Al Qaeda and threatening to kill McManus and Lamolinara if their demands were not met.

Britain’s Foreign Office has said two men were held by terrorists associated with Boko Haram, a radical Islamist sect in Nigeria blamed for more than 300 killings this year alone.

A senior British government official said the kidnappers appeared to be from an al-Qaida-linked cell within Boko Haram, but not within the group’s main faction.

Not typical attacks

However, the kidnappings represent a departure from the group’s typical attacks on government targets, Christians and public schools in Nigeria, a multiethnic nation of more than 160 million people.

Western diplomats and analysts say Boko Haram has had contacts with two other Al Qaeda-influenced terror groups in Africa and has splintered, with one wing increasingly ready to do violence.

In a conference call with journalists, a Boko Haram spokesman using the nom de guerre Abul Qaqa denied that his group was responsible for the kidnapping.

“We have always claimed responsibility for all the operations that we undertake, but we are not in any way responsible for the killing of the two foreigners,” the spokesman said in the Hausa language of Nigeria’s Muslim north. “It is not in our line of operation to take hostages.”

Despite Thursday’s violence, calm returned Friday to Sokoto. The imam made no special mention of the shootings during afternoon prayers at the city’s main mosque, attended by more than 1,000 people.

Outside the compound, the curious bent back the bottom of the front gate, allowing people to slip inside to look at the bullet holes and splattered blood.

Ahmad Muhammed, a 35-year-old neighbour, said he had never seen the people who lived at the compound. He recounted hiding with his wife and children as the gunfight raged, though he remained shocked the violence now sweeping Nigeria’s north had arrived to its quiet northwest corner.

“Look at how we are living,” Muhammed said. “Someone can just come and attack me. Nothing will happen. This is how we are living in Nigeria. Only God saves us.”

David Stringer reported from London. Associated Press writers Victor L. Simpson in Rome; Bashir Adigun in Abuja, Nigeria; Haruna Umar in Maiduguri, Nigeria; Jan Olsen in Copenhagen and Colleen Barry in Milan contributed to this report.

Read: Kidnapped engineers killed during failed rescue attempt in Nigeria

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • Ultimately those who are responsible for the death of the hostages are the criminal/terrorist scum that kidnapped these people.

    Reply
  • Sky News http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16185729 are reporting that the kidnappers got spooked and probably killed the hostages before the raid. The SBS had to move fast and didn’t have time to call the Italians.
    Also every gangster in Nigeria is claiming to be Boko Haram as a cover for criminality, so just because they claim that they are BH doesn’t necessarily mean that they are.

    Reply
  • terry 10/03/12 #

    Relying on the Nigerian army for intel and military support was their first mistake I would not be surprised in the scum bags got a tip off. Unless you come in at night and are know exactly what room they are held in it’s very risky. Anyone working in Nigeria should really be living in a compound do it Saudi style.

    Reply
    • mcbab 10/03/12 #

      Oh my goodness terry talk certainly is cheap. So that’s the way you would do it eh? Know for certain exactly where hostages are being held and then go in at night. Will call on you the next time so. Takes brave men to put their own lives on the line in an operation like that. Don’t anyone forget that.

      Reply
    • terry 10/03/12 #

      Your ok if your ever in such a situation I’m sure your captors will tire if you and let you go. Of course they where brave men that tried to rescue these guys but it was ill conceived plan the outcome clearly shows that.

      Reply
  • Two poor men died because of British’s stupid mistake & even not bother to notify Italy. Another British arrogant.

    Reply
    • Two men died at the hands of their captors. All the rest is politics. RIP.

      Reply
    • Rescue operations involving the special service have a success rate of less than 30% so it was doomed from the start.

      Reply
    • Kev Mak 10/03/12 #

      a narrowminded comment again made out of misplaced hatred,no comment made about the ‘FACT’, these men had been kidnapped, tortured and drinking contaminated water. They were not going to be allowed to live anyway,no attempt to ensure their health didnt deteriorate to the point of death was made by those that kidnapped them.How many of those kidnapped do we not know about? many others not from europe we never hear about unless you search news articals, they very rarely survive the ordeal.

      Reply
    • I remains to be seen how the men actually died. The lack of details from England on things like this often means a lot in its own right.

      Reply
  • Interesting, Brian-you clearly know more than I do about the situation. But it seems to me that if any group in Nigeria should feel threatened or put upon, its the Christians (in the North mostly as I understand it ) who seem to be targeted for ethnic cleansing in a most violent way. And who surely are the main threat to destabilise that volatile country. Those who t adopt their methods or similar tactics are no better and deserve very harsh measures. Of course the “ordinary decent criminals” should be separated from the mass murderers, church-burners and kidnappers. As for the US my observation is that intervening in Nigeria is nowhere near the agenda. They can get oil from Canada if the Obama Administration would allow the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline and maybe some more drilling in the USA. The desire to avoid those measures for political reasons ( to some extent motivated by environmental concerns, strangely not echoed by like concerns for the environments of other oil-producing countries) would be abandoned if the choice were getting mired in Nigeria. Anyway, there may be regime change in America soon enough and the more local and stable sources will be used far more readily.

    Reply
    • American policy tends to be long term so they would love nothing more than to be invited into a country to “fight terrorism” whether it is a substantial threat or not. Just look at the Kony 2012 campaign for instance in resource rich Uganda. Nigeria has shit loads of oil and corruption is endemic, what more could the oil barons ask for?

      The Christians in the North are getting a hard time of it and nothing would please AQIM than to stir up sectarian strife but at the moment they don’t have the numbers. So all they have to do is to get the Government to over react and do the job for them.The Government and security forces just aren’t equipped to deal with BH as a group never mind the criminals. The time of the car bombing of the Church’s a few months back was a case in point. Less than 16 hours after the attack a reporter for Al Jazeera did a report standing beside one of the cars! would you have seen that in Omagh?

      BH http://tinyurl.com/85e3qce is a response to massive corruption and suppression by the South but that doesn’t make them the good guys either. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram note the line ” Boko Haram “fighters reportedly “used fuel-laden motorcycles” and “bows with poison arrows” to attack a police station”
      “In a 2009 BBC interview, Muhammad Yusuf, then leader of the group, rejected scientific explanation for natural phenomena, such as the sun evaporating water being the cause of rain, Darwinian evolution, and the Earth being a sphere “[i]f it runs contrary to the teachings of Allah” Thank God I’m agnostic :-)

      A quick read of the wiki article and also http://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/nigeria-boko-haram-terrorist-group-islam-christian-church-targets-youth-military should give you a better idea of why this could go pear shaped very quickly if not handled right.

      As for posting comments I think you brought this up on another thread. I’m using Facebook and it keeps telling me to login all the time even when I am logged in. I have to copy and paste everything which is really annoying. I wish this got sorted out as it’s a pain in the ass when you write a detailed reply only to lose it all.

      Reply
    • I read your links Brian. I’m definitely better informed now, but also more depressed by the situation. What a mess!

      Reply
  • What difference does it make whether they are or they aren’t?

    Reply
    • The difference Charles is the Government response to the threat posed. If BH is a small group and is targeted in a precise and structures way then the group itself is the only one affected. If on the other hand the Government goes after everyone that happens to have even the most tenuous ties to BH it can backfire big time. Just look at internment in NI and how that turned out. People were lifted that had minor links to the republican movement and this turned the whole community against the Government.

      If the Nigerians start targeting criminals under the guise that they were BH Muslim extremists linked to AQ it could quickly turn the ordinary Muslim on the street against them. They may see it as an attack by the christian south on the north using terrorism as an excuse to suppress them. No-one is saying that criminals should be dealt with severely it’s just the method used that matters. It won’t be long before Uncle Sam starts pumping billions of dollars into an oil rich country that is one of the most corrupt in the world and creating another massive balls up.

      Reply
    • Reply below Brian. Are you having trouble posting comments? ( I use a Twitter account).

      Reply
  • it should have been a joint operation, and would most likely have doubled their chances of success if Britain had shared intelligence

    Reply
    • How would it have doubled the chances? What can the Italians bring to the table? The British have got much more experience in this kind of thing by a long shot.

      Maybe you’ve been watching a few too many movies. The unfortunate reality is that this kind of operation always carries a major risk because of the extreme difficulties involved. These men were going to die and the SAS were the best chance they had of survival.

      Reply

Add New Comment