TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Elation as final US troops roll out of Iraq

The last American soldiers whooped and hugged as they crossed the border into neighbouring Kuwait.

A soldier gestures from the gun turret of the last vehicle in a convoy at the Kuwaiti border
A soldier gestures from the gun turret of the last vehicle in a convoy at the Kuwaiti border
Image: Maya Alleruzzo/AP/Press Association Images

THE LAST US soldiers rolled out of Iraq across the border into neighboring Kuwait at daybreak Sunday, whooping, fist bumping and hugging each other in a burst of joy and relief.

Their convoy’s exit marked the end of a bitterly divisive war that raged for nearly nine years and left Iraq shattered, with troubling questions lingering over whether the Arab nation will remain a steadfast US ally.

The mission cost nearly 4,500 American and well more than 100,000 Iraqi lives and $800billion from the US Treasury. The question of whether it was worth it all is yet unanswered.

After a ceremony Thursday in Baghdad formally marking the end of the war, the timing and all other details of the departure of the last convoy were kept under tight secrecy out of security concerns for about 500 troops and more than 110 vehicles that were part of it. The low-key end to the war was just another reminder of how dangerous Iraq remains, even though violence is lower now than at any other time since the 2003 invasion.

The last convoy of MRAPs, heavily armored personnel carriers, made a largely uneventful journey out except for a few equipment malfunctions along the way. It was dark and little was visible through the MRAP windows as they cruised through the southern Iraqi desert. The 210-mile trip from a base in southern Iraq took about five hours.

When the convoy crossed the border into Kuwait around 7:45 am local time, the atmosphere was subdued inside one of the vehicles, with no shouting or yelling. Along the road, a small group of Iraqi soldiers waved to the departing American troops.

“My heart goes out to the Iraqis,” said Warrant Officer John Jewell, acknowledging the challenges ahead. “The innocent always pay the bill.”

Soldiers standing just inside the crossing on the Kuwaiti side of the border waved and snapped photos as the final trucks rumbled over.

‘I’m pretty excited’

“I’m pretty excited,” said Sgt. Ashley Vorhees. “I’m out of Iraq. It’s all smooth sailing from here.”

The war that began in a blaze of aerial bombardment meant to shock and awe the dictator Saddam Hussein and his loyalists ended quietly and with minimal fanfare.

President Barack Obama stopped short of calling the US effort in Iraq a victory in an interview taped Thursday with ABC News’ Barbara Walters.

“I would describe our troops as having succeeded in the mission of giving to the Iraqis their country in a way that gives them a chance for a successful future,” Obama said.

In the final days, US officials acknowledged the cost in blood and dollars was high, but tried to paint a picture of victory – for both the troops and the Iraqi people now freed of a dictator and on a path to democracy. But gnawing questions remain: Will Iraqis be able to forge their new government amid the still stubborn sectarian clashes? And will Iraq be able to defend itself and remain independent in a region fraught with turmoil and still steeped in insurgent threats?

Many Iraqis, however, are nervous and uncertain about the future. Their relief at the end of Saddam, who was hanged on December 30 2006, was tempered by a long and vicious war that was launched to find nonexistent weapons of mass destruction and nearly plunged the nation into full-scale sectarian civil war.

Some criticized the Americans for leaving behind a destroyed country with thousands of widows and orphans, a people deeply divided along sectarian lines and without rebuilding the devastated infrastructure.

“We are glad to see the last U.S. soldier leaving the country today. It is an important day in Iraq’s history, but the most important thing now is the future of Iraq,” said 25-year-old Said Hassan, the owner of money exchange shop in Baghdad. “The Americans have left behind them a country that is s falling apart and an Iraqi army and security forces that have a long way ahead to be able to defend the nation and the people.”

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • The US will be back in there again within 15-30 years trying to remove the latest leader who they helped put in because they aint playing ball no more over oil or something. In the mean time they will set up contracts with american weapon manufacteurers to arm him to the teeth then in years to come declare the country dangerous and a threat to America. Oh here we go again.

    Reply
    • Yup it’s all about oil. Aren’t we smart enough now to realize that oil wasn’t the motivating factor? Look up where the USA gets its oil from. If anyone is after middle eastern crude it’s Europe.

      Reply
    • What currency does the world use to buy Iraqi oil?

      Who prints that currency like toilet roll?

      And how come the last 2 major dictators of oil rich countries to say they planned to stop using that currency for oil trade have been toppled?

      Iran has stopped using that currency for a while now, do you see a pattern yet?

      Reply
  • I’m glad for them as individuals that they are going home, but they shouldn’t have been there in the first place!
    They leave behind a country with no resources, 10s of thousands dead and no economy to speak of.
    The one thing they haven’t taken is the Iraqi people’s spirit! Good luck to Iraq and it’s people.

    Reply
  • quick pitstop in kuwait befor they head on to iran

    Reply
  • An excellent balanced piece of journalism which clearly acknowledges the wrong of the invasion.
    While in leaving Iraq the US troops leave a Country that will probably now turn on itself with a further vengeance.

    In the meantime , so many families will sit down to their Christmas Feast this year having lost a Son or Daughter as a result of a lie by their President, to justify the invasion on the grounds of the infamous search for WMD’s – the fictitious Weapons of Mass Destruction, which ironically were held only by one side , Yes the American side.
    The irony is that mostly Wars are justified on the backs of a lie , while the Innocent die!
    Happy Christmas Iraq.

    Reply
    • It’s hard to imagine that on top of the American four thousand , five hundred, body count , that more then a Hundred Thousand Innocent Iraqi’s died as a result of the American invasion in pursuit of “Oil” economic control.

      Shame on Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld ! – the real Terrorists , in this whole shameful affair.

      Reply
    • The upside is that saddam was removed and iraq has a democracy. Also it is mainly Iraqis that killed fellow iraqis.

      Reply
  • Will they learn? We hear about sanctions for Iran due to its speculated nuclear programme. So Iran is not allowed nuclear weapons but the US, France, North Korea, England, Israel etc is?

    Reply
    • Iran will use theirs thou. Its president said israel should be wiped off the map

      Reply
    • No he didn’t! What he said was hyped in translation by our media. He said something along the lines of wishing the end to the zionist govt and policies of Israel, but when we heard it it came out like that he wanted to emilinate the state of Israel. Remember he is meant to be the bad guy here!!

      Reply
    • Everyone likes to forget America has used the atomic bomb! Yet people seem to think they are peace makers. America has invaded many nations in my short lifetime. How many contries has Iran invaded?

      Reply
    • Oaklane1 18/12/11 #

      @Niall, and to what end did they use that atomic bomb, would you have had WWII go on for another year or two?

      Reply
    • Damhsa his express wish is the destruction of Israel..he has denied the Shoah..he presides over a regime that rigs elections and executes gay citizens. iran funds hamas hezbollah..terrorist organisations and his best buddy assad is currently butchering innocent syrians

      Reply
    • Just remember he is the head of the Govt, but there is also the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei running the country. Ahmadinejad is a bright man and knows to attack Israel would be suicide for his country so why would he!
      You must remember that he must say and do a lot for public support domestically and that lately he has not seen eye to eye with Khamenei, he boycotted all religious activities and duties for 11 days before getting large criticism from the public a year or 2 ago. The police I believe are also under the control of Khanenei, in Tehran anyway, not Ahmadinejad.

      His denial of the Shoah, was by means to address the fact that over 60 million people lost their lives during WW2 yet everyone only speaks of the Jewish deaths, that up to 58 million were civilian and had nothing to do with the war and why did the people of Palestine have to suffer for the mistreatment of the Jews when no other country in Europe would take them in after the war. The UK “gave” them the lands of Palestine which conveniently was their religious birthplace.
      It all boils down to his distrust and dislike for Zionism, not Jewish people. There are loads of Iranian Jews which live without persecution or hassle in Iran, and it took many in during the troubles and after the Iranian revolution. there is also a fatwa to not persecute them, and many have said they are treated better then muslim Iranians themselves, once they knew you are Jewish they leave us alone some have said.

      I don’t agree with his support for Assad especially when part of the public are seeking reform and his removal, there is no excuse for the treatment and murder that is ongoing there now.
      However I understand his position and backing towards Syria as a country and Hamas and Hezbollah, as he see’s Israels viewpoint anti-Muslim and calls for Islamic solidarity, and seeking peace with them is not possible, we see it ourselves in the news, when ever there are attempts at talks, Israel will within days shot some kids throwing stones or more typically they advance with settlement building again or of course some militants fire off a rocket over the Israeli border again, either way, back to square one!
      I think everyone knows peace can not exist between either side, there’s far too much hurt and history on both sides now. With the U.S.s full support behind Israel in any actions, which many have been criminal, there’s over 60 odd UN violations cited against Israel but they ignore them and U.S. ignores them thanks to AIPAC and the heavy Israeli influence in Washington it’s hard to see how there can ever be proper peace.

      So I get where his backing of Muslim groups and countries comes from, not saying that I support such actions mind. It’s far from black and white and I know I’ve forgotten a lot of what I previously read about the country relations with surrounding countries but know that our opinions are greatly influenced by our media and every news snippets of the US’s criticism towards them.
      All i know is I don’t trust or believe anything the U.S. or Israel are pushing for, as its been done to death now and its always aggressive in nature just like all the others, Iran has been on their list for decades and sooner or later they will do something. You can be sure it wont be Iran taking the first step either towards an all out conflict.

      I sincerely hope not though as I cant stand to think of 100′s of thousands more civilians killed and more maimed for American banks power and Israels paranoia.
      I’ve written far more than I’d have liked now, so ill stop, sorry for waffling on. This is my take on matter.

      Reply
  • Jingles 18/12/11 #

    “Arab nation”? Surely they are Persian.
    Anyway is the next stop Syria or Iran?

    Reply
    • alan 18/12/11 #

      you’d like to think that the next stop might be the usa. in the sense that the people there are beginning to see through thier adminsitartions and are taking action against them. i don’t know how long agenicies like fox news, hollywood cinema, celebrity culture, residual nationailsm and so on can keep a nation pacified. but sometimes you get the feeling that the average american citizen might just be waking up to what is being done to them and to what is being done in their name

      just as long as the next stop isnt shannon (which i am afraid it appears to be as the american troops using it seem to be still using it without any action being taken by our own govt

      Reply
  • No comments..!

    Reply

Add New Comment