TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

1982: The term ‘Irish Free State’ deemed ‘inappropriate’ by An Taoiseach

The rebuttal was in response to a letter from England which suggested that the ‘Irish Free State’ should be renamed the ‘Irish Secular Free State’.

Government buildings
Government buildings
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

ON 15 MAY, 1982, a letter was sent to An Taoiseach Charles Haughey from Bristol in England which made reference to an article in the publication ‘The Christian Irishman’.

The article in question made reference to a “strong plea” by The Southern Association of Baptist Churches for government to “act decisively in the area of marriage and family law” and to “legislate without any sectarian bias”.

Having attached this article, the author questioned whether Haughey wished to “make the ‘Irish Free State’ into an ‘Irish Secular Free State’”.

The response, from John Hurley on behalf of Haughey, made assurances that the “interests and traditions of the Protestant community” would be protected “in the context of a united Ireland”.

The letter ended, however, with a rebuttal.

In closing, may I remark that your reference to the ‘Irish Free State’ is inappropriate: the name of the State is Ireland.

To view larger image, please click here.
IMG_0084
(Taken from file 2012/90/977, available from the National Archives)

Read all of TheJournal.ie’s stories on the 1982 State papers >

Read next:

Comments (13 Comments)

  • “DR” haha its widely known that his doctorate is a joke. It was given to him by a redneck fundamentalist university pal from the bob jones university.

    Reply
  • @ Conor Foley:
    “Dr. Paisley is still very much in the present”

    sure he is, & i wish him well.
    Marty McGuinness converted him from being arguably Europes’s nr. 1 bigot, into quite a likeable ol geezer.
    BTW – he’s also managed to get Robinson to break into a smile, now & again – & that was some achievement too.

    Reply
  • Most people in Ireland are in no way sectarian in outlook or viewpoint. In fact we now embrace the idea of different religions, difference in general. The northern state is a great shopping and cultural asset to the Island. Dr Paisley (while probably guilty of hate crimes in the distant past), is now viewed with affection by people ‘down south’

    Reply
    • @ Brian, I think that there is no conscious and intentional sectarianism but there is undoubted sectarianism. Take just one example. Look at the Papal Cross in the Phoenix Park, a symbol of Roman Catholic triumphalism. As a former Roman Catholic , I recognise how easy it is to be blind in Ireland to the ubiquitous signs of sectarianism and religious discrimination.

      Reply
  • Ireland is and continues to be a sectarian state. There was a time when I despised the remarks of the late and unlamented Ian Paisley that in Ireland Rome rule applies. Despite the criminal actions of the Roman Catholic Church it still continues to dominate legislative policy in many areas.

    The most sectarian provision in the Irish Constitution was they infamous Eight Amendment, the pro-life Article 40.3.3 equating the life of a pregnant woman and a foetus. That was passed in 1983 contrary to the wishes of the Church of Ireland and the Protestant Churches. The alliance of the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church and its boot boys, the Youth Defence League, the Life Institute and PLAC frightened timid politicians and a confused electorate into introducing a sectarian Constitutional provision into the Irish Constitution.

    Reply
    • Dr. Paisley is still very much in the present

      Reply
    • True, but politically speaking he and his son are a spent force.

      Reply
    • Peter here is a link to an excellent article: http://www.atheist.ie/ that factually points out blatant discrimination against the non religious in this country.

      Reply
    • @ JoeSixtwo, many thanks. I have just read the article and I must say that it expresses very clearly the case that there is discrimination against non believers in Ireland. It is so easy to be complacent and to be blind to the reality of how the institution of the Roman Catholic Church continues to discriminate against those who do not subscribe to its dogma and values. Thank you very much drawing this to my attention.

      Reply
    • Peter you can see how complacent people are when it comes to dogma and superstition when they red thumb without even reading the article.For some people ignorance is bliss.

      Reply
    • @ Peter Richardson:
      the border that partitions Ireland into two states was carefully drawn on the basis of a sectarian headcount, so that there would be a 60/40 Protestant / Catholic ratio, within its borders.
      the Six County State – described by one of its leaders as ‘A Protestant State for a Protestant People’, operated largely as such, until the campaign of the late 20th century resulted in improved rights for the Catholic/Nationalist population.
      the Twenty Six County state was, & still is just the remaining part of Ireland.

      Reply
  • Who cares what it’s called. We need to move on from tribes and cave men mentality. We all share the earth and Germany and the banks rule our day to day activities.

    Reply
  • The island of Ireland has, in recent history, consisted of two sectarian states. Their legacy is still with us.

    If ever Ireland is to be one free state, which it has never been in history, it must put sectarianism behind it.

    Reply

Add New Comment