TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Medvedev: Russia will deploy missiles if US shield goes ahead in Europe

Russian president takes a tough stance over the controversial missile defence shield,

File photo of Medvedev and Obama enjoying burgers together in Virginia, US last year.
File photo of Medvedev and Obama enjoying burgers together in Virginia, US last year.
Image: AP Photo/Mikhail Klimentyev/ PA Images

RUSSIAN PRESIDENT Dmitry Medvedev has warned the country will deploy new missiles aimed at a controversial Europe-based US missile defence shield if America persists with the plan.

Russia has heavily criticised the plans to construct the shield, parts of which will be based in Romania and Poland. The US says the plan is to help protect it from ‘rogue’ states such as Iran and sees it as part of its contribution to NATO.

Medvedev today said that Russia could set up its own missile defence system and threatened to pull Russia out of the Starr Treaty and stop  nuclear disarmament if the US keeps pressing ahead with its shield plan.

“We will prepare, and if necessary implement, other measures to counteract the European aspect of the US missile defence system,” Medvedev said. “In case of an unfavourable development of the situation, Russia deserves  the right to refrain from further steps in disarmament and arms control.”

The relationship between strategic defensive and offensive weapons means that Russia may also pull out of the latest START Treaty.

The president added, though, that Russia “is not closing the door” on further negotiations with the US and NATO.

Medvedev is due to stop down as president in March, but is expected to seek the prime minister post currently filled by former president Vladimir Putin. Putin will run for the presidency next year.

Drawn-out negotiations for the US budget have suggested that the missile defence plan could be put on the backburner amid funding pressures. Kurt Volker, US ambassador to NATO during the last Bush administration, said that paying for a missile defence shield in Europe would be a hard-sell if it appears to Americans that the US is “picking up the tab for Europe”.

- Additional reporting by the AP

Read more: US budget woes could threaten European missile defence plans >

Read more: US signs missile defence deal with Romania >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (19 Comments)

  • Well the US foreign policy is terrible they need to realise that if they conduct mischief in Russia’s back garden there is obviously going to be a reaction… USA must realise that if some other country say china wanted to build a missile defence system in Mexico they would be angry too… America is broke… And making stupid moves that are careless and detrimental to fostering good relations with other countries

    Reply
  • Can you blame them for being a bit worried?
    With the U.S.’s history they should have every reason to object and try prevent these being build so close to their borders! No one is threatening any other country except for the US.
    They are the world’s sole aggressors for the last 60 years. It’s one rule for the US and another for everyone else as always.
    None of the 5 US intelligence or European agencies, or Iran itself for that matter has ever suggested/shown there is any sign of n. weapons development or for procurement.
    China has all the financial pull it needs so doesn’t need to start any war either.
    Again without US interference sorry “foreign policy” would there be a fraction of the global disputes and tension. All this fear and non stop spouting crap about nuclear weapon building and Iran’s ill intent comes from the Whitehouse and Israel. No where else.
    They want regime change as Iran is strong and independent and doesn’t need to depend on foreign money or the US’s approval to get by. That makes the US itchy, plus its one of the last of the M.E. oil producing countries they have yet to get control of (Syria being the other). The US fear the SCO (the Shanghai Cooperation Organization) also as they are trying to wrangle power from Washingtton as M.E. countries scramble to sign up to it and have been outspoken against the US defense shield and santions against Iran.
    Nuclear weapons have nothing to do with any of this. Corporate greed and control does.

    Reply
  • Cold War II?

    Reply
  • Nice big fat defense contract for some private corporation. Id be more worried about them crazy republicans than Russia and China. How many wars have Russia and China been in recently compared to the US and Brits who to be quiet honest are murdering innocent civilans in the name of oil and money. Anyone who thinks otherwise is watching too much corporate media.

    Reply
  • Paul 23/11/11 #

    Here we go again

    Reply
  • 23/11/11 #

    The shield as it’s called is actually in an odd place to combat Iran. Strategically it’s better placed to counter Siberian missiles.

    Reply
  • America’s military budget is 10 times the size of the rest of the world combined.

    Reply
  • Paul 23/11/11 #

    Europe & the West needs these defences, the threat from Islamists & the Chinese in the future cannot be denied! These are indeed worrying times! Russia is now practically an authoritarian State. Europe & the US should in my opinion deploy these defences as a matter of urgency!

    Reply
  • Ok I’ll plead complete stupidity here! Can someone explain to me what is threatening about a shield? Why would a country (Russia) have a problem with it? Serious question!

    Reply

Add New Comment