TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

McAreavey, Harte families reject Mauritian Sunday Times apology for Michaela photos

The only proper apology would be to tell the police how the photos were obtained, according to Michaela’s families.

Image: McAreavey Family handout/PA Archive/Press Association Images

Updated 11.51

THE MAURITIAN NEWSPAPER that published photos of Michaela McAreavey’s body after she was found murdered in her honeymoon hotel room has apologised for its actions.

But the McAreavey and Harte families have rejected the editor’s statement, saying the hurt caused by him over the past 48 hours could not be undone.

The Sunday Times publication said its decision to print the images was not borne out of sensationalism but rather was “to recall that such a heinous crime remained unpunished”.

According to BBC News, the paper’s director General Imran Hosany apologised to both the McAreavey and Harte families, as well as the people and governments of Ireland and Mauritius.

Police raided the newspaper’s offices in Port Louis in search of the photos but nothing was recovered.

In a joint statement, the McAreavey and Harte families said:

As an Editor he made a calculated decision to use photographs and images that no responsible media outlet would have touched. He further exacerbated his actions by printing an inexcusable editorial in a feeble attempt to justify what was wholly unjustifiable.

A spokesperson for the families also called on the paper to tell the police how they obtained the images.

As there is an ongoing police investigation by the Mauritian authorities as to how these distressing crime scene photographs found their way into the hands of this newspaper, if as this man claims, he is fully cooperating with the police, then the best and most obvious form of apology would be to tell them how his newspaper came into receipt of these photographs. This would be a start to taking some degree of personal responsibility.

The Prime Minister of Mauritius issued a statement yesterday to condemn the actions of the weekender. He said the publication of the images showed an “utter lack of respect for and a reckless infliction of further hardship on the bereaved families”.

This act runs counter to the deep attachment of our country and our citizens to family values and respect of those who have lost their beloved ones.

He added that the culprits will be brought to justice and that all steps would be taken to maintain the reputation of the island as a “hospitable and friendly place”.

Boycott

As Mauritian authorities work to salvage the island’s reputation as a luxury destination, the idea of boycotting the popular location is gaining legs in Ireland. First floated on Twitter as an immediate reaction to the acquittal of two men who were accused of killing the 27-year-old Tyrone woman, the boycott of the island has extended to more than just the ruling out of hypothetical holidays.

A Donegal travel agent has stopped selling Mauritius as a destination, with the owner stating that she “just really didn’t have the stomach” for it anymore.

Speaking to Radio Ulster, Carolyn Davies of Liberty Travel in Letterkenny said, “I was particularly appalled by the way John McAreavey was treated in the aftermath. It was just a decision that we’ve taken and we’re going to stick to it.”

She said that she has received the support from staff and customers, some of whom had asked her about the boycott.

“Whilst I appreciate that you can’t punish the entire nation of Mauritius for this – it can happen anywhere – I do think there are very big questions to be answered,” she continued. “Whilst one little independent travel agent isn’t going to make a difference, I would urge other members of the travel trade to think about it. Everyone has their own choice at the end of the day.”

Irish investigation into Michaela murder not ruled out>

Read next:

Comments (82 Comments)

  • Of course they apologise, they have sold the papers, attracted all the attention they could ever desire and now they simply say sorry and go on the charm offensive. How many papers have done similar…..

    Reply
  • They make me want to vomit . They knew the devastation and agony these photographs would cause Michaela’s family. The only reason they are are making apologies now is they under estimated the public outcry and probably forced into it by their government. They are beyond contempt and have NO moral fibre.

    Reply
  • Stable door. Horse. Bolted.

    Reply
  • Too little to late
    RIP

    Reply
  • The insincere exploitation of this case by the media, both at home and in Mauritius, is now an obnoxious intrusion upon the families involved.

    Reply
  • I certainly wouldn’t consider Mauritius as a holiday destination anymore. Not out of protest, but the general negative feeling hanging over it since the revelations about the botched police op and their disregard for basic decency.

    Reply
  • What happen is very sad, a father lost a daughter, a husband loss a wife.. Crime happen everywhere in the world, and people can’t condemn/blame the whole nation for some useless people who haven’t done their work properly.
    Example : there is loads of junkies/ drug addict on the street of Dublin, that doesn’t mean every Irish citizen is drug addict or junkie. That just my opinion being a Mauritian citizen.

    Reply
    • I don’t think a boycott would be blaming all Mauritians Vimal. It is a protest against the useless people. There is no comparisson between junkies in Dublin and every Irish person not being a junkie, this grievance is with the police and the state in Mauritias. In our eyes they have made mess of the investigation and not delivered justice. Also the images being posted in the paper of our countrywoman’s dead body is outrageous. I have to say you comment in very unintelligent and lets your homelands authorities of very lightly… you’re pretty much saying “no ones is perfect”.. and to my mind that doesn’t come close to being acceptable.

      Reply
    • No offence Daniel, but you don’t speak for me, as in our eyes etc. Vimals comment is an intelligent, logical one and thankfully a long way from some of the knee jerk, populist comments all over this story coming from the bandwagon brigade.
      Take a look closer to home in regard to the press and police botch ups.

      Reply
    • Sory Rommel, was taking the general national views, not speaking for every individual. I think the vast majority of Irish people think there was a mess up made of the criminal set up here. So I don’t think my view speaks for everyone, but I don’t think it goes to far as to be pretty much the consensus.

      As for the un intelligent aspect. To talk about Ireland’s anger with the Mauritian authorities and newspaper getting leaked photos of a murder victim and publishing them, as if this is on a par with saying we are all junkies because some are, is very un intelligent. It also shows no grasp of why people are upset and just a desire to stand up for his nation by whatever means nessesary. Even including compairing our anger and feelings for the bereaved to ignorantly taring a whole nations people with the same brush. There is no comparrison in what is happening here to what he lays out in his absurd example.

      Regarding our own botch up and garda corruption, they have to be looked at of course, I strongly agree, but they are not reasons to not feel outraged by the resent events. In particular the printing of this poor woman’s dead body.

      Reply
    • Daniel,
      Yes the vast majority of Irish people believe the police investigation was a shambles as do I. However the majority of people do not support some kind of boycott against Mauritius. You cannot have a selective boycott against the useless people.
      A blanket boycott is being proposed by some and Vimals junkie analogy is correct and reasonable is this respect.
      There is plenty reason to be outraged with the events in Mauritius but the media generated hysteria around it at this stage is ludicrous.

      Reply
    • Rommel, accepting the investigation was a shambles, that the officials leaked confidential photo’s to the press who published them in the most calous and reckelss way regarging loved ones of Michaela, how can it be said that Ireland/Irish people protesting by not going on holiday there is the same as someone coming to Dublin, seeing junkies and viewing all Irish people as junkiesis just ridiculous.

      Firstly, seeing one group and then deciding the whole nation are the same is no way similar to people being angry and protesting the treatment of a fellow citizen, her family. How can you even compare them. One is blind ignorance that paints all with the one brush on the tiniest of evidence, the other is a response directed at the people responsible, the state, judiciary and the press, based on exact evidence and massive disrespect for the dead and grieving.

      The comparison is insulting, just as the editors publication and subsequent apology was. It says the problem is with people angry with what happened and is happening, rather than what has happened and is happening.

      As for the media criticism .. are you serious? Read the article, it is about the Mauritian Times newspaper… are you saying the problem is the fuss being made of the publication of these images, which is grossly indecent and unethical, not the publication of the images??? Rommel I think you should have left a trail of breadcrumbs when you went down this reverse logic and reverse blame argument. I have a feeling I’m wasting my breath here, so best leave it there, nothing to be gained going on, in my view that is.

      Reply
    • Christ It’s not rocket science. The original posters point was that just as it would be unfair to characterize all Irish as junkies based on the actions of a few, then it follows that to punish all Mauritians economically for the actions of a few is also wrong.
      If people choose to not go there on holiday that is their right, but if pressure is to be brought to bear on the few, then it should be done on an official level in my opinion.
      Lastly the actions of the Mauritian paper are disgusting beyond belief and i’m in no way trying to say different, but lets not kid ourselves that our own press isn’t heading in the same direction in some cases.
      Slán

      Reply
    • I know what the original poster point is, classifying all Irish people as junkies is not in any way the same as Irish people protesting against the applying and incompetent behavior of the Mauritian state, police, justice system and press. It’s not rocket science, your right, it’s not rocket science that this is an unjust comparison.

      As for our own press heading the same direction in some cases, that is just a cop out from calling it as it is. In this case the problem is the Mauritian Press, by a gross degree. So this is not about our press and their press, is is about their press, in fact only the publication that released the images. Use as many red herrings and smoke and mirrors as you like, the fault here is clear.

      Also there is no major movement to sanction the country. It was a small group as a knee jerk reaction. The pole I saw, here I think, show most not in favour, large amount undecided and a reasonable minority in favour. Out of those how many would be going to there anyway.

      Look, I don’t agree with the analogy of the junkies … there is no comparison and it distorts the righteous anger of the irish people. It too is a cop out, peoples anger is not a judgement on all the nation based on a small group of marginalized people, it is justified anger based on the behaviour of the mechanics of a state.

      Reply
    • Daniel Murray very well said 100% agree

      Reply
  • juliana 17/07/12 #

    Michaela McAreavey held an Irish passport.

    Reply
  • The damage was done in the name of selling papers. It should never have happened, so the apology is meaningless. Whats worse is that someone involved in the investigation must have supplied the photos. That is a government dept. Heads should roll if they want to substantiate their apology.

    Reply
  • Lauren, I agree that we treated the family of the victim more humanely – I’m really just commenting on how badly the families of foreign victims must feel about our country when they don’t get justice after their family members are maimed or killed. The publication of the photos is a disgrace and I hope that if there was any chance of anyone being brought to justice for this crime, it hasn’t been affected by their publication.

    Reply
  • I was critical of the focus the Irish media were giving this case, when plenty other Irish ppl have got murdered abroad and not received similar assistance off the likes of RTE in particular, however, this latest crap by the Sunday Times in Mauritius is beyond horrific. I still think all this talk of boycotts are pretty childish and would not place Ireland in a great position tourism wise if we were to be on the receiving end of such actions, however, someone or some people clearly need to be prosecuted for this latest violation of the most basic human rights!

    Reply
  • The whole situation is a disgrace,but it could’ve happened in any country

    Reply
  • The publishing of these photo’s is un excusable. They were gotten illegally and showing the dead body of a murder victim is unethical in the extreme. THey knew what they were doing when they did it and the effect it would have, there are precedence and guides on this. It was wrong, the apology is worse than meaningless.

    Reply
  • They knew full well what they were doing when they published the pics. I don’t like that regular joe soaps in Mauritius have to suffer (if the tourism trade takes a hit) but it’s the only way to make their authorities sit up and listen. Someone needs to pay for how this has gone down- the botching of the investigation and the poor treatment of the families.

    Reply
    • So it’s ok for the innocent people of a country to suffer due the, admittedly, despicable actions and wrongdoings of people in authority in that country. Does that hold true purely for the people of Mauritius. Or is it a general rule that can be applied to all countries. What happened in Mauritius is plainly wrong but you can not blame a whole nation for the actions of a few. Should the Irish people be made to suffer because of the failings and wrongdoings of our previous government? Oh wait. We are.

      Reply
    • Then why did the whole world boycott south african goods during apartheid? you vote with your feet against something you feel very strongly about. it’s how you get the people in charge to take notice. i wish there was another way, as like i said, i don’t want innocent citizens to have to suffer. Their authorities have left us with little choice but to disassociate with the country to a certain extent.

      Reply
    • Wow. So now you’re comparing to the actions of an idiot newspaper editor and some incompetent/corrupt cops to the systemic and institutional racism of apartheid and all the evils that go with that.

      I am afraid there are very few places in the world that you will be able to visit if you are going to boycott all the countries where corruption and incompetence are rife.

      Reply
    • No Paul, I’m merely explaining how boycotting a country works-you hit them where it hurts, where they can’t ignore it. I’m not calling on the world to boycott Mauritius- but the Irish people should be trying to take a stance here.

      Reply
  • juliana 17/07/12 #

    The N.I executive is involved also.She traveled on an Irish passport so the Irish government have to get involved.

    Reply
    • Thanks Juliana, genuinely didn’t know and was confused. Either way, it’s a tragedy. I don’t believe in boy cotting because it’s not the government that suffer, it’s the people (as we have seen under extremely different circumstances) but do believe that our own should be allowed investigate and re trial, our guards are good and if you look at some of our high profile murder cases they have been resolved quickly with professionalism and in a dignified matter.

      Reply
  • Kim 17/07/12 #

    Oh well if your sorry that makes it alrite then…NOT… To little to late!!!! Hang your heads in shame

    Reply
  • I’m guessing there won’t be too many Mauritians holidaying in Donegal for the foreseeable future.

    Reply
  • While I don’t think a boycott will have much of an effect I would support it as a form of protest directed at the hotels and law makers on the island. Unfortunately it’s to late for this case but it might just embarrass them into training there police force properly and if this does happen again there might be a better outcome for all concerned

    Reply
    • Chuck, the police are very well trained, as been one of them once, and a good one, top of the class in the CID. But I chose to leave because of all the massive political interference in every aspect of detective work, from regular duties to promotions. Just as in every school all over the world, some come out top of the class while others fail. Same thing with the Mauritius Police, where Top of the class guys are not properly used or are made to feel unwanted but the bottom ones, the inefficient and incompetent are chosen to join elite teams, which is something really political, actually. In elite teams like the CID, under which the MCIT operates, is full of incompetents and holds only a handful of those who are able. Many competent ones have been punitively transferred to either regular police or riot unit, due to too much political interference in those teams.

      Reply
  • What happened to Michaela was both sad and terrible.But collective punishment of an entire nation because of the actions of a few is extreme.Before anyone mentions Irelands situation please don’t,its not appropiate on this thread thanks.

    Reply
  • mcgoo 17/07/12 #

    Irish citizens should avoid holidaying Mauritius at all costs, it’s clearly a corrupt, unjust, lawless country, where anything goes. Disgrace.

    Reply
    • Unfortunately Mcgoo, most of the places that the westerner considers paradise for a holiday are Banana Republics with high levels of corruption. Look at Sri Lanka, Maldives, the whole Caribbean and many more!

      What happened here could happen in any of these places!

      Reply
    • Actually, you can use all of them words to describe a location in Ireland!

      Reply
    • Reg 17/07/12 #

      Did you just describe our own fair isle mcgoo!

      Reply
    • Ireland ?

      Reply
    • @mcgoo Just like Ireland. A corrupt, unjust, lawless country where anything goes. Imagine your shock if the French were to boycott Ireland over it’s nationals being murdered in this country. There are good people who are part of a society, and there are people who choose to live outside the rules we all agree to abide by. These people exist in every nation on this planet. We have enough of our own to be getting on with. They are everywhere, in government, in the police force, in county councils, in banks, in every town, village and city on this island. When we have cleaned up our own mess, we might be justified in calling for some form of retribution, until then ?????/

      Reply
  • Well the Killer is still out there somewhere,,,
    I bet there is someone shitting themselves now that those two guys got found Not Guilty,,,

    Reply
  • @Gillian. She was an Irish citizen living in the North of the island of Ireland. She chose to travel as a citizen of the republic of Ireland therefore comes under the jurisdiction of our government.

    Reply
  • What about our own cases where justice didn’t prevail for foreigners? Sophie Toscan du Plantier’s family didn’t get justice but the French didn’t boycott us. I e-mailed the Legends Hotel at the time Michaela McAreavey was murdered to express the horror we in Ireland felt at the idea we wouldn’t be safe in our holiday accommodation. Not sure how I feel about boycotting the island as we have so many cases of justice not being served here on our own doorstep.

    Reply
    • Emma, with respect- we didn’t treat Sophie’s family the way the Harte/McAreavey family has been treated, we didn’t publish pics of her corpse in our national papers. We also attempted to cooperate fully with French authorities throughout. I of course still hope for justice in Sophie’s case too, it was a horrible crime.

      Reply
    • Lauren. The Mauritian people didn’t authorise the publication of the photos. It was the editor of the paper in question. You can’t vilify the whole country because of the despicable actions of a few individuals.

      Reply
  • I will not speak for the country or what ‘we’ should do. We all have our own opinions and act by our consciences. I wont be visiting Mauritius, thats my choice based on the tragedy and how it has been handled from beginning to end. Dont force your opinions on others but respect those of others

    Reply
  • Their legal system, police force and media should be so ashamed of themselves. I wouldn’t go there if I was given an all expenses paid trip. RIP Michaela.

    Reply
    • I would!
      Look a terrible crime took place there, the police over there are lacking in professionalism as is the editor, but boycotting the whole country is just a silly idea, what will it change?

      Reply
  • It’s easy to say you can’t blame an entire nation when the crime doesn’t directly affect you. The case was handled badly and treated like a pantomime in court and the printing of the photographs made a terrible situation worse. I personally wouldn’t visit the country after it but I’m not going to condemn the people that do. The same way you shouldn’t condemn the people that won’t!

    Reply
  • I applaud the police for raiding the newspapers head office but this is a point to learn from (what this entire event has unfortunately turned into).

    Reply
  • Should the French as a nation boycott Ireland as a tourism destination for the bungling of the Sophie De Plantier case ? It’s ridiculous to boycott an entire nation for the errors of a few , Mauritius only has two main industries sugar cane and tourism and is almost completely dependant on tourism to support itself .

    Reply
    • As many have pointed out, it’s not the murder, nor the subsequent acquittal of the suspects that has people so up in arms, it’s the handling of all of it. No respect or dignity was given to the victim or her family throughout- the opposite in fact. The court conducted itself like a circus- I have limited faith in our justice system, but the cat-calling, laughing and panto-gasps would never have been tolerated here. They treated the whole thing like a game.
      And now their press think it’s ok to show pics of her body? Again, we did no such thing during the Toscan Du Plantier case.

      Reply
  • Can anyone please explain why this murder compared to other murders is getting so much coverage and interest from government.

    Reply
  • Why are the Irish govt getting involved when the McGreavys are from the UK, are the UK government getting involved?

    Reply
  • Not missing any point ! I agree 100% they were treated abdominally but a nation cannot be sacrificed for the sake of a few. Where would this country be if that was the case ?!!! that’s the thing with democracy – we’re entitled to our own opinions !!

    Reply
  • What about the guy that was killed by stabbing at the Swedish House Mafia gig in the Phoenix park ? Should the entire isle of man boycott us for not protecting him ? I was saddened beyond belief by Michaela’s death as a newly wed myself and the whole case has been a farce from start to finish but we are not dealing with a fully evolved judicial system here ! This case will certainly highlight for them the areas that need to change and I sincerely hope they make the changes. You almost got the impression that the whole trial was a ‘Mauritius Tourism’ marketeers dream because they got so much exposure. But the reality is the island relies on tourism to survive, how many decent people would suffer if the whole sensationalism of boycotting took hold? We are not in a position to judge in my opinion. Another example is of that poor Swedish student who was raped and murdered in Galway. I would imagine there are more privacy laws in this country than there are in Mauritius, hence no pictures were printed. It’s such a typical Irish attitude – cast blame on everyone but ourselves, makes me so embarrassed to be Irish sometimes.

    Reply
    • juliana 17/07/12 #

      Ciara I think you are missing the point,it is just because of the fact that am Irish citizen wad murdered in Mauritiu,but also the horrendous treatment her husband and familt recieved.the behavior of people in court and outside after the verdict was vile as wad the printing of the pictures.boycotting is a protest,if that is how people feel then they are entitled to feel that way.

      Reply
    • well said, juliana.

      Reply
  • But she was from the UK

    Reply
    • I would take a wild guess that any of her family members will tell you she felt otherwise. Northern Ireland is exactly that….Northern Ireland. An option for an Irish or a UK passport exists…she chose Irish.

      Reply
  • It’s our duty as a Catholic country to forgive them for their mistakes.

    Reply

Add New Comment