TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Not guilty: Ireland reacts to Michaela McAreavey trial verdict

A ‘boycott Mauritius’ campaign was spontaneously started on Twitter last night.

Grand Bay in Mauritius.
Grand Bay in Mauritius.
Image: Paul Faith/PA Wire/Press Association Images

BEFORE SENDING THE nine jurors out to deliberate yesterday, the judge in the Michaela McAreavey trial told them not to worry about what ramifications any verdict may have on the reputation of Mauritius.

Prithviraj Fekna reminded the six men and three women that they were not politicians and it was not their job to protect the image of the country.

“You have been told that this will have an international ramification and will affect the image of Mauritius… this is not your role,” Fekna said. “You must not allow yourself to be influenced by this, you are not politicians, you have to base yourself on what has happened.”

The economy of the tiny Indian Ocean island relies hugely on its tourism sector and the spotlight on the killing of the Irish schoolteacher and the subsequent murder trial have impacted somewhat on the industry.

Nearly one million tourists are expected each year, leading to the employment directly or indirectly of about 100,000 citizens and making up more than a quarter of the economy.

Back in January last year, the honeymoon destination saw a temporary dip in popularity and the number of visitors from Ireland dropped by about 750 people in 2011, according to figures obtained by the Daily Telegraph. There was also a noticeable fall in the number of tourists travelling from the UK in the 12 months following the murder.

The acquitted men in the case, Avinash Treebhoowoon and Sandip Mooneea, were workers at the former Legends Hotel where the McAreaveys were spending their honeymoon. Following the verdict, both said they were “very sad” about the Irish lady’s death but were happy that they were found to be innocent.

The Harte and McAreavey families issued a statement yesterday afternoon in which they said there “are no words” to describe the “devastation and desolation” they feel following the harrowing eight-week trial and subsequent verdict.

Irish people seemed to share in their anguish, and a subsequent call for a boycott of Mauritius gained legs across social networking sites throughout the night.

Hashtags inspired by the ‘not guilty’ verdict included #BoycottMauritius and #JusticeForMichaela.

Louise (@lightnessalways) used the boycott hashtag after stating: If they weren’t guilty then the right verdict was given serious questions must be asked about the police investigation etc . #BoycottMauritius

Dave McGinley (@dcr22B) also showed his dismay over the investigation: #BoycottMauritius Justice must be found for the Harte and McAreavey families. Disgusted at the absolute ineptitude of police/prosecutors.

Meanwhile, Neil Palmer (@neiltheviking) echoed most of the sentiments being written by the public across the web: Thoughts go out to the McAreavey/Harte families,utter shambles of an investigation & trial #justiceformichaela

Mickey Harte, one of the most well-known and well-liked managers in football, has remained in the public eye since his daughter’s death as he continues to look after the Tyrone team and, yesterday, some of his players shared their disappointment.

Cathal McCarron said it was a “very sad day for Mickey and Johns family’s”. “No justice…I’m sure there in everyone’s thoughts,” added the Tyrone footballer.

Armagh’s Aaron Kernan said, “What a shambles in the Michaela McAreavey trial… It was a joke from the outset!!! More suffering for the Harte & McAreavey families.”

Mark McHugh from Donegal added his voice to calls for a boycott of Mauritius, calling on his followers to get the hashtag trending.

Michaela McAreavey trial verdict: two accused found not guilty>

‘There are no words’: McAreavey and Harte families respond to ‘not guilty’ verdict>

Lawyer for the acquitted compares Michaela trial to Guildford Four>

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • I really feel for the families but at the same time the idea of boycotting Mauritius is a but of a generalisation, what would we think if the French campaigned to boycott Ireland for because of the death of Sophie Toscan du Plantier?

    Reply
  • This tradegy is only confounded by the fact it was obvious from week one what the verdict was going to be. From the outset the prosecutions presentation was shambolic and worse still was the entire police investigation which was dubious at best. I was astonished at certain Irish media reporting on this case, most notably Tommy Gorman on the P Kenny radio show where they both seemed to have the opinion that the defendants were not entitled to a defence, indeed had they reported in the way they did on an Irish murder trial, I suspect they would have been hauled before the presiding Judge for contempt. I recall somewhere that every defendant is entitled to a defence, no matter how unpalatable that approach to a defence may be.

    There seemed to be a Hang them high mentality and yet it was painfully obvious there was little if any evidence against the defendents, indeed it would seem DNA from one person, not even on trial was found at the scene and non from the actual defendants.

    It was a mess from the start and its beggars belief how anyone could be surprised at the outcome. A final point was the need for RTE to have its northern editor in attendance for nearly 9 weeks covering this trial and whilst I sympathise with the families involved, i have to wonder about this decision given all we hear about is continous cutbacks at RTE, indeed I don’t recall such resources being afforded to another murder trial involving a victim of the troubles in the north.

    Reply
  • If only the cops followed due process and did their job right. The crime scene was tainted from the start and their handling of the suspects made a conviction impossible. Doesn’t look like justice will ever be served on this now.

    Reply
  • Anyone see “inside courtroom #5″ last night? Any thoughts on the fact the security guards DNA was found? Love to know what his background was and if he was ever connected with police force! A complete fudge of an investigation!

    Reply
    • There definitely is a mystery about him.He was a security guard who had no reason to be in the room.For some reason neither side went into his explanation which sounded iffy.Yet another witness was never tracked down but is believed to be working on a cruise ship.
      One rather offensive thing is that the defence lawyer Treeluckdary is still implying things about John McAreavey while simultaneously sympathising with the family.

      Reply
  • I cant help but feel that the trial was setup to be in the defendants favour.

    Reasons –
    - The attitude towards women over there. They are treated as 2nd class citizens. Remember the cop who asked him why was he crying because he will get another wife.
    - The totally incompetent police investigation, so bad, you would think that it was purposely that bad.

    So when you get to trial, you reply on police evidence that is slim to none as it wasnt even collected.

    I dont know who did it, but with the lack if investigation, you cannot convict these guys.
    If a proper investgation was carried out and all the facts present, it may have well been a open and shut case.

    Bottom line, the murderer/s got away.

    Reply
    • Yup, thought that myself when I heard what they said to him. Nobody knows if they did it or not, but the attitudes of the cops, holy crap. Someone commented here yesterday that he used to work for them for five years and detectives were drafted in from the traffic cops in some sort of buddy system. Unreal.

      Reply
    • Do people really want to take the chance in putting two men in prison for up to 60 years for a crime they did not commit? Where’s the justice in that?
      And quite frankly we don’t have to go half way across the world to see lawlessness all we have to do is walk down any street here in Dublin

      Reply
  • Hard to blame people deciding to boycott Mauritius. The police there seem to be very incompetent if not downright bad. Did they put any incontrovertible evidence in front of the jury? I do suspect they used torture to get a confession. It’s just not a safe place to holiday, criminals exist in all societies, we depend on good policing for our safety and that is not an example of good policing.

    Reply
    • Since I can recollect, this is the first ever murder of a tourist on Mauritian soil. Does it mean that the place is badly policed due to the incompetence of a handful bunch??? I don’t think so. Crime happens everywhere in the world and it’s very sad that Michaela was a victim there. My heart goes to the family. And let me reiterate this: Mauritius is one of the safest and most friendliest place in the world. What has happened has happened. We can’t bring Michaela back and we also can’t say that the place is packed with criminals etc… Unfortunately due to incompetences of some bunch, justice is yet to be brought to late Michaela. And this is a real shame.

      Reply
    • Exactly the same could be said about Ireland and the Irish by the French sweeping generalisations help no one. People should show their support to her family in their grief in other ways not by trying to destroy the economy of an already poor country

      Reply
    • Exactly the same could be said about Ireland and the Irish by the French sweeping generalisations help no one. People should show their support to her family in their grief in other ways not by trying to destroy the economy of an already poor country

      Reply
    • Whatever about a boycott I would not feel personally safe in mauritius. To be violently murdered in a luxury hotel is not my idea of a holiday. It would be safer to sport a tricolour and go parading down the Shankill on the 12th than spend one night in Mauritius

      Reply
    • mattoid 13/07/12 #

      Tad of an over-reaction there Kingstown?

      Reply
  • A real sad thing for the bereaved family here. Justice hasn’t been found for Michaela but to generalise things is utterly misappropriate. A murder had been committed, which is something very wrong and unforgivable, and on top of that, Mauritian Authorities as well as the defence Lawyers has shown much incompetences and at one stage the trial was being conducted as a show. All these are very bad for the image of the country and reflects negatively on its people. Now it’s time for the government there to do something to get things right. At this stage, it is very difficult to find the real culprit(s), if there is any, or to reconvict the already accused parties due to police botch job. Justice has to be brought to Michaela in any good way possible.

    Reply
    • J Mc 13/07/12 #

      Having stayed there for 2 weeks I
      Know what the place is like and items were stolen out of our room in a similar resort to Micheala and Johns, nothing happened when reported (a watch, 500€ and iPod touch) the manager said “sir I’m assure you the room it must still be in all staffs never this happen before” word for word.. People at pool reported similar things to us with shirts and one girls expensive shoes going missing, it is rife over there. I think boycott is a great idea, you have to hit these people in the only place they feel anything, their pocket. It makes me sick to think they got away with it or the real murderer(s) are still out there, all because the authorities biggest case to
      date was probably shoo’ing a chicken out of a shop

      Reply
  • While obviously a tragic incident, the reality is it could happen anywhere. Sending the wrong people to prison would not be the answer. Condemning a nation is also not right. I don’t think anyone should boycott the country. It’s not like tourist haven’t been killed in this country

    Reply
  • It’s very easy to say it’s not fair to boycott this small already poor country…..but as we know it the only way to get the attention of the powers that be is to hit their pockets. Yes it’s unfair to generalise the whole country but how else do you make their government take notice. The whole trial was a joke from start to finish…

    Reply
  • OK..based on this philosophy Ireland would be taken off the list by France Switzerland America to name but a few……what an illogical approach. Whoever thought of this one should be sent to the Maldives for two weeks….Hmmmmm…..

    Reply
  • Boycott Mauritius? Ok let me add that to Portugal, USA, UK, etc. It’s a long list. And don’t forget Schull.
    Ridiculous knee jerk reaction that wouldn’t be out of place in the Oirish Daily mail.

    Reply
  • Eggfuel 13/07/12 #

    colourful use of adjectives… probably not appropriate…

    Reply
  • D T 15/07/12 #

    it was funny that the security guard should have a reason to be in someones room, would have taught that he was only on duty at a club not in a hotel, i dont know any hotels with security guards,
    what was his job anyway,
    we see security at night clubs,
    but not in places that are supposed to be peaceful and safe,

    Reply
  • The security guard was arrested and then released!!! Have to say As his was the only DNA this is quite bizarre????
    Also really don’t think the police done enough. Deeply saddened for all Michaela’s family but equally wouldn’t want to see 2 innocent men go to jail either. Although not too sure off that either the way their lawyers went for Johns character and him never in the frame at all. I do really hope that some day the families will get justice.

    Reply
  • Peter 13/07/12 #

    It’s possible he may have killed her by accident ?

    Reply

Add New Comment