TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Nurses’ union insists graduate scheme will lead to job losses

General Secretary of the INMO issued a statement this afternoon, following remarks by the HSE’s Barry O’Brien this morning.

Nurses rally at Croke Park last weekend
Nurses rally at Croke Park last weekend
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

THE IRISH NURSES and Midwives Organisation has insisted that one thousand currently working nurses will lose their employment as a result of the Health Service Executive’s graduate employment programme.

In a statement this afternoon, General Secretary Liam Doran disputed the HSE’s Director of Human Resource’s claim that he had misrepresented the facts with regard to currently-employed nurses.

Speaking on Morning Ireland today, Barry O’Brien had said that no nurses currently on contract would lose their jobs because of the scheme.

The scheme has been met with much criticism from representative unions, which have likened it to a cheap labour scam.

With his statement, Doran circulated a memo sent by the HSE’s Human Resources department on 14 December 2012 which outlined:

Please be advised that should any hospital have provided contracted employment to 2012 graduates following on from their final clinical placement these should be discontinued immediately.

The General Secretary added:

“This sentence is actually highlighted in this memo and is explicitly designed to advise hospitals to terminate the employment of new graduates, currently being paid the correct rate, so that they are forced to apply for these new jobs at the 80 per cent rate.

“In addition, the INMO reaffirms the reality that, in order to fund these graduate places, 1,000 existing nurses, currently employed through agencies and on short-term contracts will have to be sacked to allow for these new graduates to take up their posts.”

The memo, seen by TheJournal.ie, also states that the initiative provides an “exceptional opportunity to significantly reduce agency usage and overtime”.

Earlier, O’Brien has said the HSE currently employs 35,000 nurses and when recruitment was complete, it would hire 36,000 nurses.

“Outside of the employment control ceiling, a thousand graduates can be offered two year contracts in addition to the approved ceiling for nurses which we currently have, so they are additional jobs.”

When asked if he thought it was fair for them to do the same work for 80 per cent of the pay he said: “It’s no different from any other job where you have a direct graduate entry programme and people join the work environment at that grade.”

O’Brien added that there would be “no circumstances in which we will tolerate any sort of a non cooperation with any graduate who comes to work under this programme by their colleagues”.

HSE opens recruitment for graduate nursing programme>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (42 Comments)

  • Seagizmo….I stated that there were very few jobs which carried the level of responsibility as that of a nurse. I mean that in respect to ‘all’ jobs within society. I agree that doctors, teachers and the person who writes the software for a nuclear reactor, are also in the bracket of the ‘very few jobs in society’ which carry such great responsibility, however their starting salary reflects this. As do their wages in general. And rightly so.
    You ask how we compare to other states? Our graduates can currently walk into a job in the UK, such is the demand for Irish nurses, on a salary greater than that paid here, and are supported to further their careers and trained up in whatever area they choose to specialise in. No such support exists in this country. Australia and Canada also offer incentivised packages far greater than those offered here.
    Irish nurses are highly valued around the world such is the level of training here and reputed personable nature of our nationality (according to recruitment agencies in these respective countries). Further cuts to nurses pay will only further incentivise our graduates to emigrate when there are more deserving ways of clawing back our fiscal deficit. Starting at the top!

    Reply
    • seagizmo 11/01/13 #

      “Starting with the top”

      Now there is something we can agree on.

      Reply
    • Hi
      I work as a nurse in the UK and the starting salary is £21k so equivalent to yours at 22 euro. There is no “walking into jobs” here. They are fiercely contested. While I agree cuts may seem unfair, until we have a competitive environment, we will never have a system of fair pay.

      Reply
    • Hi Lisa,
      I say ‘walking into a job” there because out of one graduating class of 2011, approx 150 of the 200 or so graduates were recruited into hospitals in the UK before even receiving their final results. Most were given the option to choose their preferred area and also the opportunity to study further should they so wish.
      Also £21,000 in the UK does not equate to €22,000 here in Ireland.

      Reply
  • Seagizmo…do you have any idea of the job specification which a nurse works to, that you feel 22,000 is overpaid? I have worked at numerous jobs in my time, most of which required no experience or formal qualifications whatsoever, and all of which paid far better than 22,000 per year. That is less than €12 per hour.
    There are very few jobs, even within the hospital environment, that require the employee to take as much responsibility as that of a nurse. Outside of the acute setting, many nurses are taking responsibility for up to 20 patients in some settings. If, god forbid, one of these patients were to choke on their meal or suffer a cardiac arrest and not make it, a nurse could find themselves up in court and lose their livelihood. How costly are mistakes in your line of work? If a nurse is expected to take responsibility for the lives of so many people it should be reflected in a wage which at least shows they are in some way being treated fairly.

    Reply
    • Some fair points, allow me to respond:

      a) I did not state nurses were overpaid, I was curious if the starting salary was too high? Advancement and salary increases should be performance linked and from my experiences the majority of the nurses I have come across would have no issue achieving this.

      b) I am still curious the comparison with our other states. As a comparison, I started on IR£12k after a 4 year non medical degree (~2000).

      c) While I agree nurses have an important role, so do firemen, doctors, teachers, the person who writes the software for cooling a nuclear reactor or the engineer who designs air bags for cars. Being responsible and taking responsibility is about being an adult. Saying one job is more important than another doesn’t make sense and stops any fair comparison aka a reality check!

      D) I also think the pay scales for some allied health workers when they get to the upper end is too low when compared to the skill and experience level. I am married to one! There is something wrong in the system.

      E) What I do and I work for is not important, you’re correct in assuming that if I make a mistake no one dies and I hope you won’t take offence to this and it comes across as intended, nursing has risks. I am pretty sure they outline them in the 4 years at college, it was an active choice to choose nursing as a career.

      Finally, I am friends with many of your colleagues and while I sympathise with your plight. Reality bites.

      Reply
    • CABK 11/01/13 #

      Yes seagizmo, Im sure that nursing courses outline the risk involved in that nurses are responsible for patients lives – however in spite of this they continue with their training and want to be nurses as they care about looking after people and saving lives – I don’t agree with your view that just because they are informed of this it therefore doesn’t matter that there are huge risks to their career and also to patients LIVES every day they work. So have a bit of respect for the nursing profession and hope you don’t find yourself in need of their care any time soon.

      PS I am not a nurse

      Reply
    • No disrespect intended (apologies if i did) but until we compare apples with apples we can’t get fair pay for all.

      Reply
  • Why don’t politicians cut their salary to 22,000. Well they’ve said it’s reasonable salary haven’t they? And 2year only contracts from now on, then to the back of the que and proformance based…. Oh they’d be phuuuucked! Get out people, get out of this kip now before its too late!

    Reply
  • The whole college course for nurses involves loads of on the job training. I think even the last year is just a year totally in hospital apart from a few weeks in college so they are already experienced. This is just pure taking advantage. When the 2 years is up they will just not renew the contract and get a new nurse fresh out of college and the cycle starts again. Pure extortion.

    Reply
  • Graduated in Sept 2010, accepted to London NHS hospital with open arms. £21.5K sterling starting wage, full support in professional development and opportunities for promotion. My hospital are currently paying for a post graduate course in University and giving me 4 hrs a week study leave for the duration. Why would a young eager newly qualified nurse even be tempted to work in this country. It makes my blood boil when I see what is becoming of our great heritage of producing wonderful nurses…… only to export. It’s shameful. And why haven’t all health care personel in the same boat, physio’s, doctors, dieticians, therapists and of course management levels. Picking on the vulnerable again…

    Reply
  • All I know is that we need a nurse when we come into this life and are so delighted to have them nearby as we are leaving. What a shame it is for our society that we have to be so penny pinching the most important front line profession. Our politicians will need the assistance of this profession at some time during their life.

    Reply
  • Is Gilmore / howlin proposing that all politicans elected at the next local/general election take a 20% pay cut ? Oh wait no course their not , that would hit them then . Sure lets hit frontline services instead .

    Reply
  • They are held responsible the same as a full time nurse so why should they not be paid equally??

    Reply
    • Could it be an admission that the basic starting salary for nurses (and the wider civil service) is too high?

      Open question rather than a statement?

      How does starting pay for new nurses compare to other states?

      Reply
    • Less (none?) experience?

      Reply
    • Because they are coming in at Graduate level and will then rise through the ranks and on to full pay.
      This is the norm in the private sector. What logic is there in paying a new Graduate the same as an experienced practitioner ?

      Reply
    • Is it not the case that they will permanently on about 20% less than their peers. They are calling a 20% cut to new nurses employed as graduate scheme. These nurses will never see the same rates as current nurses

      Reply
    • We always started on a lower increment and went up yearly to top of the scale at year 12. However these nurses/midwives will start at 80% of that starting salary remain on it for two years when their salary will most likely be terminated that’s where the issue is no one has ever said that new grads are paid the same as senior staff.

      Reply
    • Rory, what do you call a graduate nurse? A nurse. Not a graduate, not a trainee, a nurse.
      Pay scales exist for advancement of experience, this cut is wrong, wrong, wrong.

      Reply
    • These graduates have already completed a 9 month internship as well as over 30 weeks of supernumerary practice. They are by no means inexperienced and so differ hugely from workers in most other sectors. Including other professionals in the health sector.

      Reply
    • Serious? I look at some private sectors workers and query why their pay should be so high? Basic scenario; your involved in a car crash and rushed to an A&E, you are met by staff whose job it is to offer you the best care possible. But hey if you pay them peanuts, you might just get a monkey service.

      While your private sector argument is they work hard and aren’t the propping up the tax income take to pay for the Nurse.

      Well did you know that each new job in Ireland created by the IDA costs the tax payer €12,000 in tax breaks.

      Did you know that the gap between the rich and middle classes is growing at a phenomenal rate. How? Cause it is the premise that we shouldn’t tax the rush cause jobs might leave Ireland! Eh income that could be taxed is leaving Ireland at a phenomena rate under these Troica/IMF agreements.

      In the end it’s your choice! But I think, from personal and professional reasons, they money Nurses, Social workers, Allied Health Professionals are paid, is extremely good value for money.

      Reply
    • However the money paid to the allied health professionals with similar years of education (though considerably less practical experience) is disproportionate to the pay of nurses described in many research and policy documents as “the backbone of the health service”

      Reply
  • Start with weakest, graduate nurses , but watch out your next, private and public,
    If your serious about over pay in the public service then start at the top and do it right, cowardly , and unjustified at this stage

    Reply
  • What hours does Barry OBrien work? What does he earn? What holidays does he get? How big will his pension be? What medical training or qualification has he got?

    Reply
  • the only reason the government is trying this very very low tactic is because they think they can get away with it. by the nature of what nurses are mainly female their unions aren’t strong. it’s so bad it’s unbelievable. i.m a public servant and i really believe that everyone’s wages should be cut rather than taking a easy option like this. i really hope no graduate nurse takes these jobs!

    Reply
  • Schnucs 11/01/13 #

    I’d challenge any politician to live on 22000 a year. Give up the life for 1 year and live on 22,000, apply for social welfare, support family etc and no cheating. None would even dare try!

    Reply
  • we’ve already paid our dues, put up with the same shit for 3years unpaid +9months barely paid.. (apprentices are paid from day 1, mightn’t b a lot but its more than what we got). 80% is an insult, to the highest degree. we put peoples lives in our hands. whether your 4, 10, 20 or1 years qualified. in “other sectors” things arent as risky. do the job of a nurse+you’ll soon change your narrow minds.

    Reply
  • It’s very annoying to see media outlets continue to refer to this as “graduate” issue.

    These are not “graduates” going to make tea in daddy’s office. These are nurses. Full fat, free range organic nurses. They don’t compare with “graduates” in other sectors.

    When our bleeps go off in the middle of the night because a nurse identifies a sick patient, we don’t stop to ask when the nurse left college.

    Reply
  • If making stupid statements such as those above, is all this man O’Brien can do to try and justify this attack on graduate nurses, then he’s clearly not fit to do the job he’s being paid for! I’m a bit surprised that the nurses unions haven’t called on their members to strike though. I think that if they were as worried about this as they claim to be, an all out stoppage would’ve been caller for by now, asking the graduates to boycott these jobs is only a buck passing excercise. I think complete solidarity is the only way to fight this.

    Reply
    • Rodrigo Liam Doran leader of the biggest union the INMO is no fool he knows we have no public support and he won’t jeopardise his position by asking anyone to strike he made a hash of the strike in the ’90′s and the work to rule in 2007 he won’t do it again.

      Reply
  • You can’t directly compare £21 to €21,cost of living is cheaper in the UK.

    Reply
  • I agree, if nursing wasn’t a female dominated profession the government wouldn’t be trying this underhand tactic

    Reply
  • Why do politicians continue to to be salaried in jobs ..ie teachers when they are not practicing teachers

    Reply
  • As already stated, we go out in 4th year as interns and when we ‘qualify’ 9 months later, we are just as good, if not better, than those with years of experience. In fact, I’d say we’re that little bit better because we’re not as ‘burnt out’ as some of those out there!

    Reply
    • Joanne never think your better than a nurse with years experience you loose your battle that way. I once had a nurse sneer at me because I qualified when certificates were the highest award I hold a triple qualification and a masters and I am an expert practitioner she on the other had a degree and a week in theatre.

      Reply
  • Yup. let them all give up their jobs and their families [ and taxpayers ] suffer.Brilliant idea !

    Reply
  • I didnt say I was better than nurses with experience, I said I was better than ‘some’ which is not a presumption but a fact! I’ve worked with some amazing nurses who are better than some of the Drs out there. Having said that I’ve worked with dreadful nurses too, who couldn’t give a damn, spend more time looking at the off duty than the patients they’re well paid to look after………….

    Reply
  • Shane, there’s good and bad in every profession, I’m just stating my opinion

    Reply
    • Joanne, good and bad, can be assessed by mgt, we shouldn’t decide this as individuals, now qualified you will be responsible for your allotted patients, do the job well and don’t be worrying about others

      Reply

Add New Comment