TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

HSE opens recruitment for graduate nursing programme

The INMO has urged new graduates not to be taken in by the HSE’s “disingenuous marketing”.

The rally held by nurses/midwives at Croke Park last week.
The rally held by nurses/midwives at Croke Park last week.
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

THE HSE TODAY launched its graduate employment programme with 1,000 new nursing positions, amid strong criticisms from the union representing them.

The Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation has said the programme is “nothing more than an attempt to introduce cheap labour under a superficial guise of an educational graduate programme”.

General Secretary of the union, Liam Doran has also said that it would mean 1,000 experienced nurses and midwives would be let go to make way for the new graduates who will be working for 80 per cent of the agreed rate of pay.

Speaking on RTÉ’s Morning Ireland today, Barry O’Brien, Director of Human Resources at the HSE said he wanted to stress that no nurses currently on contract would lose their jobs because of the scheme.

“We currently employ approximately 35,000 nurses and when we recruit  the 1,000 nurses we’ll employ 36,000 nurses,” he said.

“Outside of the employment control ceiling, a thousand graduates can be offered two year contracts in addition to the approved ceiling for nurses which we currently have, so they are additional jobs.”

When asked if he thought it was fair for them to do the same work for 80 per cent of the pay he said: “It’s no different from any other job where you have a direct graduate entry programme and people join the work environment at that grade.”

O’Brien added that there would be “no circumstances in which we will tolerate any sort of a non cooperation with any graduate who comes to work under this programme by their colleagues”.

At a rally that took place in Croke Park, last Saturday the nurses/midwives sanctioned a complete boycott of this initiative which opened today.

A spokesperson for the HSE told TheJournal.ie that, as the employment programme has just been launched, there will be no figures for the number of applications received until next week.

Related: Criticism for HSE’s 2013 service plan as health unions to be briefed>

Read: James Reilly asked to stop HSE plan to pay graduate nurses lower salaries>

Read next:

Comments (53 Comments)

  • “no nurses currently on contract would lose their jobs because of the scheme”

    This is a blatant lie.. O’Brien admitted as much in his next breath, when he said that agency nurses would not have their contracts renewed. Of course he wasn’t pressed on the point by the numpty interviewing him.

    Reply
    • Reg 11/01/13 #

      Contracts by their nature are normally for a fixed term. Once the time is up it may not be renewed. That is the nature of the beast and it is how contracts work all over the private sector.

      Reply
    • @Reg – Yes, I appreciate this. The point is that this graduate scheme is not actually providing *new* jobs. It’s just replacing the people currently in the system with new, lower paid people.

      Reply
  • Joanna 11/01/13 #

    seriously a lot of ye having no understanding of what a nurse does or how hard we work. We have massive responsibility we are doctors eyes and ears. if we make a judgement you dont like you can report us to the nursing board and potentially get struck off. this is not about private public as a lot of the private sector match the public. this is about my colleagues earning less then colleagues in the public sector who have no qualification and no responsibility. its an insult after four years in college just because your an engineer and suffering doesnt mean they have to. the nurses wont stay why should they. theyve had a taste of the pressure and conditions theyve to work under why should they. always working overtime no extra pay but if you dont do everything exact you could end up in court. come see what i do for a day then judge the new graduates. why didnt the first year politicians start on 30, 000 see how long they last!!!!!”

    Reply
    • Agree totally Joanna only thing I fear is that there will be a big uptake of these positions . Mature students are not going to go away . Students I know are going for these positions . Going to denigrate profession altogether . I fear it will create a lot of animosity in wards . Graduate all responsibility low pay , care assistants no responsibility nearly double pay. Also certain nurses don’t care who on ward as long as somebody there taking situation I am alright could not care less that fellow colleague poorly paid . Hoping grads don’t take these but fear they will

      Reply
  • lets hope the nurses are proud inough to give the hse 2 fingers

    Reply
  • What about the 100′s of nurses that graduated in the two years previous who are sitting on a national panel waiting for their number to come up for a job! This idiotic brainwave by the hse is displacing jobs not recruiting them and forcing 2010/2011 cohorts to either join the dole que or emigrate!

    Reply
  • Much better working conditions for nurses in uk though, their healthcare system isnt an understaffed shambles. If the graduates have any sense they will up and leave

    Reply
  • The HSE’s nursing graduate programme has me completely outraged.

    It is degrading, not only for the new graduates but for our whole profession. It’s exploitative and just wrong.

    Why in this country can a speech and language therapy/dietetic/occupational therapy/physiotherapy graduate with it has to be said minimal practice experience secure a starting salary of almost €34k when a nursing graduate with more than 30weeks of supernumerary practical placement and a 9 month internship is offered €10k less?

    I value the important and unique contribution of each of these disciplines to the care we provide for people who are sick or have a disability all over this country and would not suggest that their salary is in anyway more than reflective of the work they do BUT fair is fair and this new scheme is simply not fair.

    Having worked in the UK i find the system far superior. I was paid less than I am for working in the HSE but there was at least a sense of equality with the NHS agenda for change, all newly qualified professionals in the nursing/therapy field start on an equal footing when it comes to pay and are elevated through a system of banded increments. Yes health professionals in the UK are underpaid BUT there at least is not a disparity in the terms.

    Again I am outraged at this new proposal from the HSE. I hope that the INMO and the PNA will continue to fight it and that the newly qualified nurses will be in a position not to accept this demeaning and disgraceful offer.

    Reply
    • Well said bouncyjohn, it’s all about equity I worked in NZ in 2000 and was paid less then when I was a third year student in 1993 in ireland, but we all were.
      The mentoring and grad programmes there were better than they are here now.
      It was the same when I worked in the UK and OZ the thing is equity.

      Reply
    • A physiotherapy graduate may well start on €34k but as there are no graduate physio positions it’s irrelevant.

      Reply
    • Not at all irrelevant. My point was that the way in which nurses have traditionally been treated in this country is in complete disparity to the other health professionals. This is not some fantastic training opportunity for nurses this is an exploitative measure as the conditions and level of responsibility attached to these contracts will not differ from other qualified staff

      Reply
  • The HSE is an affront to democracy, it has no shame.

    There’s only one cure for top heavy organizations.

    Turn them upside down

    Reply
  • we the irish people should be supporting these nurses as one day we are all going to need a nurse….we have got to show them that we will back them up, we cant continue to let the hse&james reilly destroy our health system!we have the best trained nurses in the world but the lowest paid, how can this be right? we need to support the general nurses&the psych nusrses as things are just going to get worse and worse and lives will most certainly be lost!these nurses are highly trained for a reason so lets keep them in our own country….the hse should be ashamed of themselves!

    Reply
  • Why would they take these positions when there are plenty of nursing jobs in the UK offering better pay? The HSE is going to pay for this in years to come when new nurses go abroad and old nurses retire

    Reply
  • Jobs will be lost! Agency nurses on contract are filling these posts as we speak.
    These are our highly trained skilled graduates who couldn’t get a job with the HSE and had to opt for agency.
    These nurses will be lost to other countries exporting the skills and experience they have fought for here.
    Disgusting juggling of numbers to make it look like they’re doing something for the HSE.

    Reply
    • Susan unfortunately those agency nurses/midwives seem to be gone already while the HSE await the 1,000 I know people who have had agency shifts cancelled at short notice in the last two weeks. It’s a disgrace.

      Reply
    • We still have a few around who’ve been with us for up to a year on lines of off duty as part of the WTEs
      Total disgrace to let these people go and pay others who cannot really replace them a meaning less wage

      Reply
  • Joanna 11/01/13 #

    ye i think they will so many with families have no choice. but a lot of nurses will support their colleagues i know we on are ward will to boycott this unfairness.

    Reply
  • Only one piece of advise
    220000 do your maths
    health insurance
    rent and so on unless mammy and daddy live in the same town as the hostpital you are offered work in the conclusion is a no brainer one year at most

    Reply
  • If I was a nurse. I would be grateful that there were 1000 positions available to me. I am an recent graduate engineer and had enormous difficulty getting a position. Now the salary is significantly less than I expected but I am grateful for a position in the area I studied. I think graduates should first worry about getting the experience before anything else.

    Reply
    • Student nurses do placements during the first 3 years of training within HSE hospitals, as extra numbers on top of staff, we then do a year internship as a full member of staff, replacing a fully paid member of staff…. If we were not experienced enough we would not be awarded our licences. There is no argument that this is getting us experience as we would have the very same responsibility as a staff nurse that is there 30 years, only paid a hell of a lot less and no doubt would be simply replaced after 2 years with another sucker willing to work for less, and no doubt other fully paid members of staff that leave will probably also be replaced with lower paid too…. It’s a vicious circle and one i hope graduates will stand their ground on for all our sakes!

      Reply
    • Pat your missing the point completely nurses and midwives have already lost work while the HSE are waiting to fill these contracts. If they fill these contracts it will happen again in two years our profession will become two tiered like it was in the uk with enrolled nurses years ago BUT we will all have the same qualification and do the same job have the same registration no one will know who’s being paid 20% less as they’ll be doing 100% plus work just like the rest if us. That’s what it boils down to and in two years its good luck and thanks for them and the new batch will probably start at a lower salary.

      Reply
  • if they don’t want to take the opportunity of €20,000 per annum with the HSE they can look for work in the UK with the NHS (level 5 salary scale for Nursing £15,600)

    Reply
    • Ryan'O 11/01/13 #

      Yep lets just keep on shipping those well educated graduates out if the country but replace them with incoming alternatives at a low pay. Genius

      Reply
    • You obviously know a lot about nursing in the uk you can not even get pay grades correct . They are not called levels in uk for 10 years they are called bands . Any graduate from this country or uk EEC starts at band 5 pay scale which is 21700 to 27000 sterling per year . Level 3 as you say is the old state enrolled nurse so get your facts correct . Should know as I am band 5 only graduated last year and working in NHS

      Reply
  • Only one piece of advise
    220000 do your maths
    health insurance
    rent
    transport

    and so on unless if living in the same town as the hostpital you are offered work in the conclusion is a no brainer one year at most

    Reply
  • Would it be fair to say that if the INO were reasonable about reducing T&Cs for existing staff, hiring “2nd tier” nurses would not have been necessary?

    Reply
    • Reg 11/01/13 #

      To be fair existing nurses have taken a hit in the way of pay cuts, pension levies and the additional taxes that all of us have had to endure. Reducing it further when you have a mortgage, child care costs, car loan etc etc. is difficult. Graduate recruits by and large have none of these costs. It’s tough but the country is broke.

      Reply
    • Good man Reg. That old Public service sense of entitlement chugs on strongly. Everyone in this economy has taken a hit the private sector nore than anyone. You people will not be happy until the only people working in the economy are public servants. Get real we can’t afford 20billion a year for you guys and the ‘service’ you provide is certainly not worth it.

      Reply
    • Reg 11/01/13 #

      I’m not a public servant John. I have my own business and in 2012, according to my P60 will have earned what one of these new graduate nurses will earn. I’ve been working for nearly 30 years and this will be the least I have earned in many years. However I do have sympathy for nurses and other similar public sector workers who have taken cuts, they were necessary though. Personally I think they should get on with it and stop this sense of entitlement that many of them seem to have. If they don’t want to take the jobs then go do something else because others will take them I’m sure.

      Reply
    • CABK 11/01/13 #

      Reg: You are missing the point. It is not as if they are adding 1000 nurses to the system, they are simply using this as a means to get rid of higher earning (although still low wage) nurses and re-enter them under this lower wage. There is no job creation – just a means to use desperate graduates. Nurses work incredibly hard and wards are understaffed – they do an incredible job caring for the lives of the patients and regardless of whether they have mortgages and childcare costs or not this doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t received adequate remuneration for this work.

      Additionally – you seem to be under the impression that all graduate nurses are care free 20 somethings – completely disregarding the mature students, many of whom have mortgages and families to support.

      Reply
    • Reg 11/01/13 #

      CABK – Firstly, I am well aware that nurses do a great job and should be sufficiently rewarded in normal circumstances. Secondly I did use the term “by and large” when I discussed the outgoings one might have. And finally, I did not miss any points. I have not discussed or expressed an opinion on whether these were additional jobs or not.

      Reply
    • CABK 11/01/13 #

      “Personally I think they should get on with it and stop this sense of entitlement that many of them seem to have. If they don’t want to take the jobs then go do something else ”

      This shows you are missing the point entirely. I have never met a nurse with a ‘sense of entitlement’ they just want to be paid fairly for the work that they do, which is incredibly difficult and very different to someone sitting at a desk or doing manual work, given their responsibility for other people’s lives.

      Plus after all their training the least they should be able to expect from our country is jobs at an adequate level of pay reflecting the work they do rather than your suggestion that they ‘do something else’ if they are being treated unfairly.

      Finally, you say about ‘normal circumstances’. If anything these ‘non normal’ circumstances make things harder for nurses given staffing shortages, so I fail to see why having to work harder and longer and in more difficult circumstances because the country is broke means they should be paid less….

      Reply
    • Sorry Reg,

      You were so far into their corner I felt you had to be one. It’s difficult for public servants to see themselves as Private sector people do. As the private sector ( value added part of the economy) shrinks all we hear from the protected sector is ‘ Me Me Me’ I get pissed off listening to ‘ Front Line ‘ people complaining about the sacrifices they make and the fact that they have to work unsociable shifts and overtime.( which of course they signed up for) Of the 535 k people either on the dole or in makey up jobs at least 80% would love to have some of the Front Line peoples problems. I suppose it’s all relative

      Reply
    • Not true reg, a lot of student nurses are mature and have all of the costs u pointed out. Why does this government make it so hard to just have a living in this country!

      Reply
    • CABK
      So you believe that nurses are entitled to a job and entitled to a particular level of pay after their years of training. What planet are you from? We don’t admit people into Nursing Degree Courses with any form of employment guarantee never mind a particular salary level. In fact there are only two types of Third Level Student with that attitude and one would clearly be Nurses and the other Teachers.
      Both of these professions have a clear and large “entitlement” streak and both are predominantly made up of women particularly at the Primary level.
      Any Society will have an ebb and flow over the years in terms of the numbers required in providing Public Services and young Graduates should be delighted that there are any vacancies whether the salaries have been reduced or not at the Entry Levels.

      Reply
    • CABK 11/01/13 #

      No Michael, I did not say that. I was referring to Reg’s point that if they don’t like what they are being offered they should ‘ go do something else’. Also I said that they should expect that jobs should be available at an adequate wage level – not a job for every nurse who ever entered a course and graduated but jobs for them in this country on an adequate salary.

      Also graduate nurses are nurses not graduates – they don’t sit around at a desk or do half the work of those more experienced than them – they do the same work as fully experienced nurses from Day 1 – therefore they are not graduates in the sense that graduate accountants and bankers etc are.

      We disagree on your point though that ‘young graduates should be happy to get any kind of work for any salary level. As I said before they are not graduates with half the responsibility or workload – they are nurses and therefore should not be happy with a temporary contract on 80% of the starting wage.

      Additionally, I’m not too sure what you mean with your rant about women and teachers and nurses and a sense of entitlement etc but just to point out that I personally have seen no evidence of this with nurses and I am not a nurse – I am a finance graduate, I have just myself been in hospital and had a close family member hospitalized for a large period of time this year and so have seen first hand the work they do.

      Finally, re your comment “Any Society will have an ebb and flow over the years in terms of the numbers required in providing Public Services” – some of the other commentators and indeed the statement from the nurses union have lots of information on what this actually means – and it is nothing to do with a change in the requirement of numbers needed.

      Reply
  • @ryan’o .. I don’t think you understand what I am saying … they are getting paid similar to the UK … what is the problem? yes they are graduates but until they are experienced they should be getting paid graduate wages

    Reply
    • CABK 11/01/13 #

      You should probably look up how the nursing degree works – there is a huge focus on placement and hence experience – in particular nurses spend almost their entire final year in the hospital. This is not the same as a graduate job for engineers or finance/marketing graduates – these nurses are responsible for the lives and care of sick patients and deserve a wage that reflects this responsibility and also the long stressful working hours they do. Nurses work incredibly hard.

      Reply
    • @cabk and i suppose they are the only people who work hard.

      So part of their training is on the job, much like electricians, accountants etc .. but they don’t go straight in to the average salary upon graduation.

      Reply
    • CABK 11/01/13 #

      @Gggordon your examples make no sense. To pick one:

      Are you honestly comparing being a nurse to being an accountant? Firstly, accountants enter on a graduate lower pay scale as they get exams and books and time off all paid for them in the terms of their contracts – this is the case with ACCA, ACA, CIMA. So this time off, payment for exams and membership to a body and books is not included in their pay scale. Additionally, they are paid less as they are not given the same responsibility of those who have more experience than them – this includes no responsibility for final output of the job and no responsibility for management and organization of the job, rather following tasks. This is the reason why graduate accountants does not go onto the average pay scale upon graduation

      Nurses however, do the exact same job as those who have worked there for years and now even more so they are doing more than that given staffing shortages.

      Reply
    • they do 86weeks on the wards as student nurses so they are fully experienced, dey are giving the same work as a senior nurse, work the same hours if not more and get treated the same so what the difference?

      Reply

Add New Comment