TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Shatter publishes long-awaited plans to reform insolvency law

The new regime reforms our bankruptcy laws, and aims to help the likes of struggling mortgage holders out of debt.

Image: Richard-G via Flickr

Updated, 14:10

THE GOVERNMENT has today published its long-awaited new laws which aim to overhaul Ireland’s bankruptcy regime and help struggling mortgage holders out of debt.

The Personal Insolvency Bill 2012 allows for some debts, like mortgages, to be written down in certain cases where the lender agrees it is unlikely that they will recoup the entirety of their loan.

Under the proposals, a person with debts of between €20,000 and €3 million can enter a ‘Personal Insolvency Arrangement’ (PIA) if they are insolvent.  A person in a PIA would then have their debts taken over by a trustee who will propose a deal with creditors.

Borrowers who owe less than €20,000 will be able to apply for a ‘debt relief certificate’ which will see those debts wiped off if they remain unpaid after a three-year ‘freezing period’.

Borrowers can also seek a Debt Settlement Arrangement where they would agree to settle their unsecured debts over a five-year window.

If the debtors do not agree to the arrangements, the borrower can then seek to declare themselves bankrupt – with the law proposing to reduce the minimum discharge time from 12 years down to three.

The discharge could still be delayed by the courts, however, if they believe the bankrupt party has been dishonest at some point during the process.

In order to ensure formal legal oversight, a Circuit Court judge will have to approve all settlements reached under the legislation.

Publishing the bill today, justice minister Alan Shatter said the measures were “designed to provide a modern insolvency process in Ireland which addresses the obligations of debtors and the rights of creditors in a proportionate and balanced way”.

The legislation, originally approved by cabinet in January, marks one of the main requirements under the EU-IMF bailout deal.

Read next:

Comments (28 Comments)

  • I hope this is put in place quickly so the people who can currently see no way out can get sorted.

    Sure, they won’t have access to credit for quite some time but at least it will get the burden off their shoulders and move on with their lives.

    As this is a bank issue as well, given today’s news, the write offs of these loans will now become Europe’s burden, as opposed to just ours.

    Great piece of progressive legislation and I hope it truly improves a lot of people’s situations.

    Reply
    • Winston, the difference between you and yours and me, i applaud this legislation. Well done Shatter for bringing it in. I may not like the man personally, but at least something is being done for those that need help and are at their wits end…

      I hope you understand my point… if legislation is good, i and others will praise it, if its bad, we will condemn it.
      You have made many many posts against other people and party TD’s. I hope you can understand that when people are tearing your party apart for decisions they make, its not on party political grounds, its because they are wrong. You and your party members slammed Martin McGuiness for meeting the Queen this week as a part political stunt, because of your skewed version of Ireland and Politics. I hope you will see from my comment, and I am sure of thers, when the Government do something right, they will get praise, and when they do something wrong, they will get slammed. You guys are in Government. I hope you guys will try and open your eyes and stop being so defensive when people are angry when you screw us over.

      Reply
    • Still think it makes more sense to go to the UK and do it, even with all the stress that entails.

      Reply
    • …It’s a vast improvement though.

      Reply
    • Paul, i agree, but in order to go to the UK, you must have an address in the North, or the UK. Most regular folk can’t afford that. :(

      Reply
    • What a load of protracted, vague, impractical, theoretical, pompous, useless rubbish.

      Insolvency (but only if the honest bankers say yes)?
      You would be as well to let these dishonest bankers write the legislation themselves.

      3 years bankruptcy?
      Plus a few years (and countless millions of Euro) for our schoolteacher government to roll it out?
      Tell me is that added to the person’s existing 4/5 years (because remember, it was 4 or 5 years ago that most of these unfortunate people went bust, it’s only that our politicians didn’t seem to notice it until now, as they were too busy filling their own pockets and pension pots)?
      So yes, that makes it still approximately 12 years as opposed to one year for our neighbors in the U.K.

      Good luck to all our young Irish entrepreneurs in the U.K, the U.S., Canada and Australia.
      Send us home some money if you can.
      We are going to need it to pay the extortionate salaries of the ”fine scholars” running the country (into the ground).

      Reply
  • Credit cards are the worst scam on the planet !! Hidden charges on top of hidden charges and before all the red thumbs I know what I’m talking about I worked for HBOS in the credit card debt department !! I would not have a credit card ever !!!

    Reply
  • The bank has a veto??? Why?
    Can see that causing problems.

    Reply
    • Ben Gunn 29/06/12 #

      The veto is with secured creditors in respect of their secured debt. The point is that if creditors do not accept a fair and reasonable offer then the debtors can play the bankruptcy card and be free and clear after 3 years.nnThe point of the legisation is to even up the playing field as between the borrower and the lenders.

      Reply
  • This is a bad bad deal. They can pursue you for 5 years for any income over €80 A MONTH!! FG/LAB lowest form of life traitors. Dora would have written better with crayons. Joke government shame oh shame

    Reply
  • Peed OffnnIgnorance is Bliss.

    Reply
  • @shanti I don’t understand if you can buy something this month on your credit card and pay it off in the same month – would you not be better off using your debit card? For example, not having a credit card thus saving on government and bank fees? Just a nice way to save yourself some money!

    Reply
    • Ben Gunn 29/06/12 #

      If you use your cards regularly and, in the case of a credit card, settle the balance each month, it can be cheaper to use the credit card. The reason is that with a credit card only a single transaction appears on your statement, incurring just one transaction charge every month rather a separate charge for each debit.nnThe other advantage of the credit card is that it gives you the protection of the consumer credit act if you have problems with a supplier. The Bank are obliged to refund your money if the supplier goes bust before fulfilling your order.nnThis is not the case with a debit card.

      Reply
  • jrbmc 29/06/12 #

    That’s great but what about credit card debt ???? They were giving themnAway like sweets a couple if years agonand thats another rope around peoples neck. A couple of years ago I was waiting for a flight in Dublin airport when I was offered a Visa card through Ryan air , so I filled the form out of boardom really and though no more off it until 4wks later a new Card arrived in the post with a credit limit of 6,500!!! I didnt even have to give any financial details on the form when i was filling it out.Thankfully I declined it and sent it back.

    Reply
  • Which means anyone living in rented accomodation can get their, credit card, Credit Union loan etc written off, start afresh in 3 years time when they will need a new car, Credit card, etc

    Banks & CU’s must be loving this one….!!!!

    Also regarding Circuit court approval,
    Lawyers 1, the people 0
    Should also clog up the courts for quite a while….Well done to the Clowns on this one…!!!

    Reply
    • Fagan's 29/06/12 #

      That isn’t evenly remotely what this is about. It is as bout as far from what this bill will entail or mean as is possible to get.

      All this bill is doing is bringing up antiquated laws from 150 years ago, that have been a massive restraint on business and entrepreneurship in this state for 90 years.

      This law was one of the conditions of the IMF bailout, they are the driving force behind this. As you cannot have a normal, growing economy or financial sector with the perverse system that is there now.

      Reply
    • Barry 29/06/12 #

      PeeedOff, clueless once again I see.

      You didn’t actually read this story did you?, same as you didn’t read the ulsterbank story were you ranted about them still having IT issues when the actual issue they have is a backlog now.

      Reply
  • Fine Gael and Labour has one more in a year and a half than Fianna Fail did in 14 years.

    Reply
  • So when does the bill come into effect or is it in effect? The establishment day is by order of the minister. When/has this order been made?

    Reply

Add New Comment