TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Plan for full broadband coverage in Ireland by end of 2012

The Rural Broadband Scheme aims to ensure the remaining parts of the country without broadband coverage get it. Separately an initiative to introduce next-generation broadband to Ireland is underway.

Image: Martin Keene/PA Archive/Press Association Images

BROADBAND ACCESS WILL be extended to cover the whole country by the end of next year under plans being announced today.

The minister for communications is attempting to identify the small percentage of premises remaining in Ireland that are unable to access broadband service.

Starting now, Rabbitte says his department is now accepting applications from these areas where broadband cannot be obtained in order to extend access to all parts of the country by the end of the year.

The scheme is aimed at helping to promote economic and social development in these extremely rural areas that do not have broadband access and ensure that anyone who wants broadband can have it by the end of 2012.

Separately, Rabbitte has also announced plans to to deliver next generation broadband in Ireland.

He is setting up task force of CEOs from major commercial telecoms companies operating in Ireland to ensure that Ireland delivers high speed broadband to all areas of the country in line with EU targets.

The next generation broadband would allow for super-fast internet access that would allow users to download entire movies within minutes and process large amounts of data whilst online.

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • Good man, Pat. Another task force.

    Reply
  • But are they talking only fixed line broadband or any broadband, parts of wexford have absolutely no fixed line access, patchy mobile broadband coverage and only real option is expensive satellite or aerial broadband which can be effected by weather, are areas like this to be included or ignored?

    Reply
    • True Louise, let’s be rid of this ‘National Broadband Scheme’ it was a total waste of time and money. Mobile broadband or ‘midband’ in Wexford is awful, I couldn’t use the internet without fixed line.

      8Mbps isn’t great – but it’s better than 0.02Mbps!

      Reply
  • Only in Ireland would you have people boasting about full broadband coverage by 2012, where most of the other countries we’re competing with have had this for almost a decade.

    Reply
  • Are we still at the bottom of the OECD along with Mexico?

    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/ireland-boasts-europes-worst-broadband-speeds-119423.html

    P.

    Reply
  • Sean 09/05/11 #

    I thought this had to be done by the end of 2010? Ireland is in the 56th place in the world by average internet speed (6.06 Mb), with much poorer countries like Trinidad & Tobago, Ghana or Moldova ahead of Ireland. So where’s all the money going then? Improve the speeds and stop talking that nonsense ‘National Broadband Scheme’. It’s not a big deal, it’s nothing magical here as people would expect to have broadband access all over the country, it’s part of the service that should be provided. They just keep highlighting their failures as this should have been done years ago!

    Reply
  • Shane S 09/05/11 #

    Privacy and access to world media are not mutually exclusive- it is unusual for individuals in most European and I assumed many developed countries to pay national lines solo(phones as well as internet) unless they seek something outside national provision. The only thing that surprises me is that the country is undertaking this well-belated task in the current economic climate-but it CAN be seen as encouraging competition and lowering costs among service providers, and this will benefit most customers in the country…hopefully!

    Reply
  • All the crappy (slow) broadband in the Ireland already and not ONE decent law in this country to stop people being ripped off by service providers.

    “Up to seven megs a second” so the adverts say – and you’d be damn lucky to get it in reality in a lot of cases!
    Listen up politicians – upgrade the consumer laws as regards broadband and actually do something much as needed too in this area!

    P.S. The BIGGEST farce of them all is Wimax broadband but don’t tale my word for it – read the public reviews: http://ratemyisp.ie/ratings/imagine/ or http://www.unitedpeople.ie/buyer.html

    Much new legislating is needed and the Irish people that are being conned – and there is many of them – are crying out for change in this area of consumer law!

    Reply
  • 6 mb? I’d love to have 6mb………mostly I get 1.4 (ish) and it’s patchy at best. We need to have better phone infrastructure to be able to get better broadband speeds. Another example of the failure of. The Eircom privatisation – money that should have been used to upgrade the phone lines etc was siphoned off by the parent company. I believe this is why we’re lagging so far behind our neighbours in this regard.

    Reply
  • A national full broadband coverage policy in Ireland is a mistake.

    People who choose to live in isolated areas, presumably do so because they place a higher value on their personal privacy than others. This is a perfectly valid opinion to have. However, it is unreasonable for those that have chosen to live amongst their neighbours in a village, town or city to have to subsidise the lifestyle choices of those who choose to live apart from their neighbours.

    I would rather the money spent on this wasteful and indulgent government programme be spent on upgrading existing broadband infrastructure so that we can have 100 Mbit/s for both residential and commercial customers.

    Reply
    • @Jim You make it sound like people flocked to isolated areas rather than being indigenous to those areas. What is considered isolated under the terms of the existing NBS and this scheme is actually part of a neighbourhood albeit a low density one. It’s hardly a ‘lifestyle choice’ to remain in such a community when to leave would require uprooting people causing further isolation? Can we even call it a ‘choice’ when many simply can’t afford to move into a more urban environment? Are we to then exclude them from 100% participation in what the drive to a knowledge economy would bring with it?

      Reply
    • Fea Ev 29/05/11 #

      Sorry Jim but I must agree with James on this point. I live a mere ten minutes drive from a major city, yet because I am on a byroad the existing phone lines only serve four houses and we are not entitled to broadband. Eircom refuse to upgrade the lines because there is apparently not enough demand. The other three houses are elderly, of course they don’t want broadband which is understandable but there are five people living in my house that all must get in line to use one single mobile dongle. Wireless apparently is another waste of time, we’ve tried that too so unless you can come up with another suggestion on how to appease 4 teenagers, I would be very interested to hear.

      Reply
  • Yet again my earlier comments deleted.

    Reply

Add New Comment