TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 3 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Column: Let’s address Ireland’s problems this year, as well as our own

Our towns and cities are hamstrung by budget cuts – but a new initiative could help find solutions and save money, writes Barry Flinn.

Image: Daniel Flower via Flickr

THE NEW YEAR and its resolutions come with a refreshing sense that we can live better. Whether driven by the guilt and expense of Christmas or the simple turn of the calendar, we each resurface with an individual vision of a new way of life.

As a country, we have no shortage of guilty expense behind us, but our vision for a better Ireland has been drowned in crisis management, leaving little time to imagine a new national identity. Though we may be shackled by the budget deficit over the coming years, perhaps nothing could be bolder than trying to achieve necessary savings by improving, rather than curtailing public service delivery – by picturing the future and going after it as early adopters of the world’s most innovative technologies and solutions.

In Sweden, the city of Stockholm is set to save €16million annually by providing 100% mobility to the visually impaired. Collaborating with state agencies, financial institutions and a technology SME, Astando, they have developed ‘e-adept‘ – an innovation that allows citizens to move freely courtesy of a mobile device connected to a digitised pedestrian network.

Full deployment is expected to cost €365,000 per year, but also release €16m in economic benefits through cost savings and employment opportunities for both the visually impaired and their relatives. The quality of life benefit is impossible to determine, but may prove to be the most transformative component of all.

Vast pool

It’s no surprise that such innovations exist around the world – the problem is in mobilising local authorities to find and implement these solutions. Globally, less than 20 per cent of local authorities publish their needs, and know about less than 10 per cent of the solutions available to them. In such a vast marketplace, cities and companies can’t find one another. Typically, cities then re-invent existing services at a far greater cost than that of accessing those which are already proven elsewhere in the world.

Citymart is an online marketplace that helps governments avoid just that, by connecting cities with a global pool of smart technologies and solutions, and making it easier to be bold. By providing both the market intelligence and a structured process to inspire and guide cities towards the right solutions, Citymart aims to improve the impact of the €3.5 trillion that 557,000 local governments spend every year.

Similarly, just as cities struggle to innovate, companies struggle to find customers. Solution providers working with us report travelling to 100 cities to find one customer, a sales process that can cost in excess of 40% of an SME’s revenue.

On November 19th, Citymart launched our fourth annual Cities Pilot The Future programme. This process will take 23 diverse global cities through a ‘Call For Solutions’ – a 12-month cycle from stating a problem, to accessing and shortlisting a trove of global solutions, to handpicking a winner, to then evaluating a completed pilot. At a cost of €7,500, the city not only finds a tailored solution, but the winning company also finds a tailored city, in need of their innovation and rooting for the success of its pilot. This all happens about three times faster than the market usually allows.

Solving a problem

One of this year’s participants was the city of San Francisco. With a $17m budget, San Francisco had spent three years trying to procure an LED lighting upgrade to cut carbon emissions, but failed to find a solution with a wireless control system capable of integrating other urban systems such as parking, traffic lights and waste management. Through Cities Pilot The Future they found Paradox Engineering, a small Swiss company with 22 employees and the exact solution San Francisco required.

In six months, the city and company achieved progress normally seen in two to three years, with San Francisco projected to save $10m of taxpayer money from their allocated $17m budget. They also saved the company €350,000 in acquisition, and Paradox Engineering have since opened a branch in San Francisco to expand their US operations.

This opportunity, to compete internationally at no financial cost, exists for all Irish solution providers. Increasingly, these providers are coming from the non-profit sector, with Barcelona recently publishing an independent ‘Call For Solutions’ including ‘opportunities for single-parent families’ alongside ‘improving the impact of tourism’. The spread of innovation is proving to be in great ideas, rather than just great technologies.

Encouraging public cycling is one area that has gained traction in cities all over the world, with obvious health and environmental benefits. Initiatives such as the Dublin Bikes scheme prove that new ideas are both possible to implement and can have transformative effects. However, not every solution will work in every locality. It has been more than three years since Dublin Bikes launched, but a similar scheme is yet to appear anywhere else in Ireland. Introduced to Dublin through an outdoor advertising deal with French company JCDecaux, it appears that smaller Irish cities can’t match the advertising space to make a similar deal feasible.

Billy Bike

Though alternative sources of funding may be made available, there may also be a different and more appropriate way of encouraging bike transport in Limerick, Cork, and elsewhere. In 2009, Copenhagen launched a ‘Call For Solutions’ on the Future of Biking, and discovered 37 possible solutions, including the ultimate winner, Billy Bike, a mobile route planner incorporating cycle paths, service stations and other navigational information.

The answer to Irish towns and cities could be in Billy Bike, but it could also lie in crowdsourced bike sharing, smart parking to cut traffic congestion, wireless sensors to give real-time traffic information, or any number of other solutions from around the world. When such solutions exist, the goal must to be to find them, at low cost, and implement them for recurring benefits.

The 2013 Cities Pilot The Future programme will aim to impact 130 million citizens in its 23 participating cities. But with participants ranging from Boston to Rio de Janeiro to Fukuoka, this impact will be dispersed and difficult to see in its entirety. Imagine, instead, a local edition of the programme, with 23 Irish cities and towns, each stating a problem, finding a solution targeted at that exact need, and evaluating its success within 12 months of starting.

This is Citymart’s vision for Ireland. Using it as a test case for a similar approach to other, more concentrated markets around the world, as well as the global programme, it will also provide a transparent and cost-effective global export market for Irish providers.

At November’s launch of the 2013 Cities Pilot The Future programme, Bob Parker, mayor of Christchurch, placed his city’s participation in the context of recovery from the earthquake of 2011:

In Christchurch, we are not just responding to disaster but also seizing opportunity. Citymart will help us tap into some of the smartest minds and most innovative technology in the world as we seek to build smarter and more forward-looking than before.

A similar opportunity exists for Ireland; an opportunity to envision the future, and live better.

Barry Flinn is the Irish representative for the non-profit initiative Citymart. To find out more about Citymart and its ambition for Ireland, email bflinn@ashoka.org or visit changenation.org.

Read next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • Some great points here. Imho govt and co council tendering for services is cumbersome, wastefull and inefficient. I hope someone in a position to take note.

    Reply
    • here here, we just need look at the governments tendering process that lead to us paying €244,000 for one website for our EU presidency to prove your point. In a forward thinking country a government might approach the colleges ad get some up and coming bright spark to design the website for the experience and exposure

      Reply
  • Great points and wonderful to see that there are people in this Republic who are seeking true solutions that would benefit us all. However, to actually see such forward thinking take a hold in Ireland a new way of doing business must be embraced by our politicians.

    Our politicians (local and state), must learn to work together and not independently, put the nation before themselves, their friends and alliances and upskill their knowledge.

    Reply
    • Marlon, you have spelt out in 1 paragraph what’s wrong Wuthering this country, the greed and selfishness of or political representatives. This will never change.

      Reply
    • Wuthering? With

      Reply
    • Ciaran you is correct the one point this article does not talk about which has us on our knees and which is not being addressed by this goverment is CORRUPTION, which has me thinking that this goverment has now become part of the problem not a solution to it, the troika promised us reform in our courts which is rampant with corruption and the goverment still appointing their cronies to the bench how are any of them going to get convicted for white collar crime its business as usual along with media turning a blind eye to it.

      Reply
    • Ciaran, I agree whole heartedly. However, I’m trying to stay positive.

      In truth… The only way Ireland can change the culture of greed and corruption of politicians into a culture of altruism is to legal hold politicians accountable by the judicial system. From my experience in the US, greed and corruption does exist with the US politicians. However, their greed and corrupt actions are more covert. The US has system that holds people accountable for their actions regardless of name, wealth or political connections. The actions of a politician found guilty of an act can find themselves in prison or blacklisted from politics. The legal system helps to keep politicians on the straight and narrow. Furthermore, self-policing by the political system is kept to a minimum. This in-turn forces more politicians to scrutinize their colleagues when fairness is ignored. This is not to say that greedy and corrupt politicians don’t exist in the US, this is to say that when they are found to have broken the law, it is quickly resolved with details given to the public.

      How can this be implemented in Ireland? First, separate the political and legal bodies. Both them should be independently policing each other. Secondly, when a law appears to be broken by a politician, investigate without a huge tribunal. Let the legal system do the investigations. Any strong evidence can then be used for prosecution. Thirdly, if an act appears to be questionable, investigate and if no law exists to cover the dishonest act, then a law should be drawn up to insure the act doesn’t happen again. In essence, get rid of the legal loopholes. Fourthly, put politicians in jail and keep them there for the full sentence. Fourthly, modify some of the abandon estates or hotels for minimum security prisons and charge the politician for the incarceration. Fifthly, the country must change their way of thinking as to persons who break the law. A law breaker is a law breaker, Zero tolerance, if it is manslaughter which is determined and life is given, then life is the time spent in jail. Not thirteen to 16 years in prison, with compassion given so the murderer can spend time with their family on Christmas, but 30 to 40 years spent in prison. In this way sentencing of less violent crimes, white collar crimes can be weighted accordingly.

      The Republic of Ireland has been a country for less than 100 years. This should not be a crutch or an excuse to permit what goes on this country as it does. I would suggest that this country put a bit of its pride in its pocket and learn from others in the world, ask for help, guidance and suggestions. Dispel the notion, that only an Irish solution can solve an Irish problem

      Reply
    • Marlon you are right but for this to happen we have to take away the appointment of judges from politicians and stop our judiciary and lawyers from policing themselves , one judge in 400 years guilty of a crime people wake up to whats really going on.

      Reply
    • Dermot
      I know this is wrong but I have never seen a sentence that long since I started using English about sixty years ago!

      Reply
    • Thanks Dermot, your addition to my comment is most welcomed. Maybe we can pick up a bit of momentum so that we as a nation can move from using the 800 years of persecution as an justification for anger, dishonesty, apathy, greed, fear and hatred, but use the knowledge gained during this time to fortify our wisdom to make this nation stronger an wiser. A place that treats all with fairness. A place that rewards honesty.

      Maybe we can take the “Best Practices” from Norway and modify them to fit Ireland. They are far wiser now than they were 40 years ago.

      Reply
  • Great article great ideas great positive thinking.

    Reply
  • We are all responsible for the political system that we continue to support instead of trying to change.

    Reply
  • yes its probably a worth while thing to look into to, but it is a biased article and while we all want to be optimistic about the future we are talking about Ireland here. Now i have plenty of dealings with my own county council and the people elected to it and i for one wouldnt have faith in them finding soloutions to any thing as the only know how to zone land and keep them selves in the news for the next election. Marlon and others hit the nail on the head until we change the system and the mind set of those in authority we are going no where. Sweden was mentioned in the article I can belive the would do some thing that would enhance the enviroment for the blind as it is a well run country as are all the nordic countries while here in Ireland the only just got round to making the footpaths and public buildings accessable for wheelchair users after the were shamed into it. So taking the initiative is not (or very rarley) the irish councilors way unless it involves a brown envelope . But I do look forward to seeing where this goes.

    Reply
  • Lets not be distracted from the elephant in the room, our politicians and the system they’ve created to benefit themselves. Lets start with that, work our way down and then we’ll be making progress!

    Reply
  • I only one see problem doing this in Ireland, we don’t tend to elect people with the intelligence to see the benefits of systems like this. Just because your father was a TD, or you were a county final winning captain 30 years ago does not make you a good public representative.

    I would suspect we will find out how good this system is only after every one of the local authorities spend years & millions of our money commissioning reports.
    However all it not lost as the OPW have already moved to open source software saving the public millions in IT expenditure.

    Is it too much to ask that our elected officials learn from this & implement to same across the country in every local & city authority, how much will the country then save?

    Reply
  • A great many people seem to have adopted a policy of blaming politicians for everything as a means of abdicating personal responsibility for anything.

    Engaging with wider society regardless of politicians seems to be increasingly anathema to people.

    Go out, engage, make a little difference.

    Reply
  • Problem in Ireland the last and present governments is about cutting services that taxpayers have already contributed to.this article shows possible ways to benefit citizens and future growth employment solutions mentioned appears beyond the capability of the so called Irish government are wedded to the Germanic model of penury.

    Reply
  • Interesting that an article which asks people to think positive has just generated the ususal negative comments. I think that sums it up really. I know a few local councillors through different local organisations that I have been involved with over the years and many of them (most I would suggest) are actually quite intelligent people and probably would be interested in a scheme like this.

    But its probably just easier for people to sit back and say nothing will happen because of our politicians and abdicate all responsibility for the issue.

    Reply
  • Well said.

    Reply

Add New Comment